全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

长江口崇明东滩水域悬沙粒径组成和再悬浮作用特征

, PP. 154-163

Keywords: 悬沙粒径组成,时空变化,再悬浮作用,底质空间分布,崇明东滩

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

根据2006年10月在崇明东滩潮间带和潮下带两个站位的大小潮水文泥沙观测资料和悬沙水样的室内粒度分析资料,对悬沙粒径的时空分布特征及其与流速等的关系进行了分析,并对再悬浮特点进行了探讨,结果表明,大小潮期间的悬沙颗粒组成较细,平均粒径的均值仅为6μm;大潮时的悬沙粒径略粗于小潮的,潮间带的略粗于潮下带的;由底床向上悬沙粒径趋于减小。悬沙粒径与流速、悬沙含量无明显的统计学关系,底质粒径、再悬浮强度和再悬浮泥沙粒径的空间变化以及浮泥的悬浮作用等是主要的影响因素。由于底质粒径的空间分布复杂,在东滩水域再悬浮具有明显的空间变化。在底质平均粒径大于60μm的粗颗粒沉积区,大小潮的再悬浮作用微小,底质以推移质运动为主。在底质平均粒径介于5~11μm的细颗粒沉积区上,悬沙级配与底质级配基本相同,该区域是再悬浮的主要发生源地;悬沙级配的变化过程揭示,再悬浮对底层悬沙的贡献率平均为8%~20%,大潮时的再悬浮强度是小潮的5~10倍,由底质再悬浮产生的悬沙在底部水层中的平均含量约为0.03~0.47kg/m3。

References

[1]  MEHTA A J. On estuarine cohesive sediment suspension behavior[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 1989, 94:14303- 14314.
[2]  KUIJPER C, CORNELISSE J M, WINERWERP J C. Research on erosive properties of cohesive sediments[J]. Journal Geophysical Research,1989, 94(C10):14341 -14350.
[3]  AMOS C L, DARBORN G R, CHRISTIAN H A, et al. In-situ erosion measurements on fine-grained sediments from the Bay of Fundy [J].Marine Geology, 1992, 108: 175-196.
[4]  MCNEIL J, TAYLOR C, LICK W. Measurements of erosion of undisturbed bottom sediments with depth[J].Journal Hydraulic Engineering, 1996,122(6):316-324.
[5]  MAA J P Y, SANFORD L, HALKA J P. Sediment resuspension characteristics in Baltimore Harbor, Maryland[J]. Marine Geology, 1998,146:137-145.
[6]  SANFORD L P, PANAGEOTOU W, HALKA J P. Tidal resuspension of sediments in northern Chesapeake Bay[J].Marine Geology, 1991,97:87-103.
[7]  WIBERG P L,DRAKE D, CACCHIONE D A. Sediment resuspension and bed armoring during high bottom stress events on the northern California inner continental shelf: measurements and predictions[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 1994,14(10/11): 1192- 1219.
[8]  TOLHURST T J, BLACK K S, PATERSON D M, et al. A comparison and measurement standardization of four in situ devices for determining the erosion shear stress of intertidal sediments[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2000, 20: 1397-1418.
[9]  REED C W, NIEDORODA A W, SWIFT D J P. Modeling sediment transport entrainment and transport process limited by bed armoring [J]. Marine Geology, 1999, 154:143-154.
[10]  WHITEHOUSE R J S, BASSOULLET P, DYER K R, et al. The influence of bedforms on flow and sediment transport over intertidal mudflats[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2000, 20: 1099-1124.
[11]  李伯根 Eisma,D.椒江河口最大浑浊带悬沙粒径分布及其对潮动力的响应[J].泥沙研究,:.
[12]  李占海 高抒 沈焕庭.江苏大丰潮滩悬沙级配特征及其动力响应[J].海洋学报,2006,28(4):87-95.
[13]  FAN D D,GUO Y X, WANG P, et al. Cross shore variations in morphodynamic processes of an open-coast mudflat in the Changjiang Delta: with an emphasis on storm impacts[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2006, 26:517 -538.
[14]  陈吉余.上海市海岸带和海涂资源综合调查报告[R].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1988.74-92.
[15]  贾建军 薛允传 等.图解法与矩法沉积物粒度参数的对比[J].海洋与湖沼,2002,33(6):57-58.
[16]  LINK A G. Textural classification of sediments[J]. Sedimentology, 1966, 7:249-254.
[17]  张文祥.[D].上海:华东师范大学,2006,65-77.
[18]  李九发 何青 徐海根.长江口浮泥形成机理及变化过程[J].海洋与湖沼,2000,32(3):302-310.
[19]  李九发 何青.长江河口拦门沙河床淤积和泥沙再悬浮过程[J].海洋与湖沼,:.
[20]  ADAMS C E, WEATHERLY G L. Some effects of suspended sediment stratification on an oceanic bottom boundary layer[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1981, 86: 4161-4172.
[21]  LI M Z, GUST G. Boundary layer dynamics and drag reduction in flows of high cohesive sediment suspension[J]. Sedimentology, 2000, 47:71-86.
[22]  李占海 高抒 陈沈良.江苏大丰潮滩潮流边界层特征研究[J].海洋工程,2007,25(3):53-60.
[23]  陈沈良 张国安 杨世伦 虞志英.长江口水域悬沙浓度时空变化与泥沙再悬浮[J].地理学报,2004,59(2):.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133