OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元

投递稿件

查看量	下载量

相关文章
更多...

湖泊科学 2013

曝气充氧对城市污染河道内源铵态氮释放的控制

DOI: 10.18307/2013.0104

凌芬,刘波,王国祥,许宽,周锋,杜旭

Keywords: 城市河道,曝气方式,内源,铵态氮释放

Full-Text Cite this paper Add to My Lib

Abstract:

以城市污染河道沉积物和上覆水为研究对象,利用模拟实验方法,探讨不同曝气充氧方式(水曝气EW、底泥曝气ES)对污染河道內源铵态氮(NH4+-N)释放的影响.研究结果发现:从间隙水和沉积物中NH4+-N的削减效果来看,底泥曝气均要优于水曝气;实验结束后,底泥曝气组沉积物与间隙水中NH4+-N含量分别减少63.39%和43.33%,水曝气组分别减少了7.54%和13.98%;从沉积物-水界面NH4+-N的扩散通量变化来看,水曝气组界面通量高于对照组,其变化规律与对照组相似;底泥曝气组沉积物-水界面NH4+-N扩散通量变化过程完全不同于其它两组,在整个试验周期内(除第5d以外),底泥曝气组的通量低于水曝气组,在第15d最低,为13.73mg/(m2·d),仅为水曝气组和对照组的14.68%和19.93%,表明底泥曝气组沉积物NH4+-N的释放潜力低于水曝气组沉积物.

References

[1]	Alp E,Melching CS. Allocation of supplementary aeration stations in the Chicago waterway system for dissolved oxygen improvement. Journal of Environmental Management,2011,92(6): 1577-1583.
[2]	Lu XM,Huang MS. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal and physiological response in aquatic plants under aeration conditions. International Journal of Environment Science and Technology,2010,7(4): 665-674.
[3]	Baudo R,Giesy JP,Muntau H. Sediments: chemistry and toxicity of inplace pollutants. Michigan: Lewis Publishers, 1990: 130-144.
[4]	蒋小欣,阮晓红,邢雅囡等. 城市重污染河道上覆水氮营养盐浓度及DO 水平对底质氮释放的影响. 环境科学, 2007, 28(1): 89-91.
[5]	尹大强,覃秋荣,阎航. 环境因子对五里湖沉积物磷释放的影响. 湖泊科学,1 994,(3): 240-244.
[6]	Soltero RA,Sexton LM,Ashley KI et al. Partial and full lift hypolimnetic aeration of medical lake,WA to improve water quality. Water Research,1994,28(11): 2297-2308.
[7]	Frank LB. Case study: Automatic reservoir aeration to control manganese in raw water Maryborough town water supply Queensland,Australia. Water Science and Technology,1998,37(2): 301-308.
[8]	Prepas EE,Burke JM. Effects of hypolimnetic oxygenation on water quality in Amisk Lake,Alberta,a deep,eutrophic lake with high internal phosphorus loading rates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,1997,54(9): 2111-2120.
[9]	范成新,张路,王兆德等. 太湖——沉积物污染与修复原理. 北京: 科学出版社,2 009: 360-367.
[10]	Teaskale PR,Batley GE,Apte SC et al. Pore water sampling with sediment peepers. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 1995,14(6): 250-256.
[11]	Ullman WJ,Allerr C. Diffusion coefficients in nearshoremarine sediment. Limnology and Oceanography,1982,27: 552-553.
[12]	更多...
[13]	Borowski WS,Paull CK,Ussler W. Marine pore-water sulfate profiles indicate in situ methane flux from underlying gas hydrate. Geology,1996,24(7): 655-658.
[14]	刘波,王国祥,王风贺等. 不同曝气方式对城市重污染河道水体氮素迁移与转化的影响. 环境科学,2011,32 (10): 2971-2978.
[15]	Munch EV,Lant P,Keller J. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in bench-scale sequencing batch reactors. Water Research,1996,30(2): 277-284.
[16]	Pochana K,Keller J. Study of factors affecting simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND). Water Science and Technology,1999,39(6): 61-68.
[17]	周丹丹,马放,董双石等. 溶解氧和有机碳源对同步硝化反硝化的影响. 环境工程学报, 2007,1 (4): 25-28.
[18]	孙从军,张明旭. 河道曝气技术在河流污染治理中的应用. 环境保护,2 001,4: 11-14.
[19]	Nowlin WH,Evarts JL,Vanni MJ. Release rates and potential fates of nitrogen and phosphorus from sediments in a eutrophic reservoir. Freshwater Biology,2005,50(2): 301-322.
[20]	钟继承,刘国锋,范成新等. 湖泊底泥疏浚环境效应: Ⅱ. 内源氮释放控制作用. 湖泊科学, 2009, 21(3): 335-344.
[21]	Gardne WS,Yang L,Cotner JB. Nitrogen dynamics in sandy freshwater sediments (Saginaw Bay,Lake Huron). Journal of Great Lakes Research,2001,27(1): 84-97.
[22]	Gross A,Boyd CE,Wood CW. Nitrogen transformations and balance in channel catfish ponds. Aquacultural Engineering, 2000,24(1): 1-14.
[23]	柴蓓蓓. 水体沉积物中污染物释放及其多相界面过程研究[学位论文]. 西安: 西安建筑科技大学,2 008.
[24]	林建伟,朱志良,赵建夫. 曝气复氧对富营养化水体底泥氮磷释放的影响. 生态环境,2 005,(6): 812-815.
[25]	Murray LG,Mudge SM,Newton A et al. The effect of benthic sediments on dissolved nutrient concentrations and fluxes. Biogeochemistry,2006,81: 159-178.
[26]	古小治,王强,张雷等. 物理改良对湖泊沉积物和间隙水特征的影响. 中国环境科学, 2010, 30(2): 256-262.
[27]	Mozeto AA,Silverio PF,Soares A. Estimates of benthic fluxes of nutrients across the sediment-water interface (Guarapiranga Reservoir,Sao Paulo,Brazil). Kidlington,ROYAUME-UNI: Elsevier,2001: 135-142.
[28]	白晓慧,钟卫国,陈群燕等. 城市内河水体污染修复中沉积物的影响与控制. 环境科学,2 002,2 3(S1): 89-92.
[29]	郭建宁,卢少勇,金相灿等. 低溶解氧状态下河网区不同类型沉积物的氮释放规律. 环境科学学报,2 010,3 0(3): 614-620.
[30]	王建军,沈吉,张路等. 云南滇池和抚仙湖沉积物-水界面营养盐通量及氧气对其的影响. 湖泊科学,2 010,2 2 (5): 640-648.
[31]	孙小静,秦伯强,朱广伟等. 持续水动力作用下湖泊底泥胶体态氮、磷的释放. 环境科学,2 007, 28(6): 1223-1229.
[32]	Morin J,Morse JW. Ammonium release from resuspended sediments in the Laguna Madre estuary. Marine Chemistry, 1999,65(1/2): 97-110.
[33]	范成新,张路,秦伯强等. 太湖沉积物-水界面生源要素迁移机制及定量化——1. 铵态氮释放速率的空间差异及源-汇通量. 湖泊科学,2 004, 16(1): 10-20.
[34]	Eddy KR,Fisher MM,Ivanoff D. Resuspension and diffusive flux of nitrogen and phosphorus in a hypereutrophic lake. Journal of Environmental Quality,1996,25(2): 363-371.
[35]	龚春生,姚琪,范成新等. 城市浅水型湖泊底泥释磷的通量估算——以南京玄武湖为例. 湖泊科学, 2006,1 8(2): 179-183.
[36]	袁文权,张锡辉,张丽萍. 不同供氧方式对水库底泥氮磷释放的影响. 湖泊科学,2 004,1 6(1): 28-34.
[37]	朱广伟,秦伯强,张路等. 太湖底泥悬浮中营养盐释放的波浪水槽试验. 湖泊科学,2 005, 17(1): 61-68.
[38]	李大鹏,黄勇,李伟光. 底泥曝气改善城市河流水质的研究. 中国给水排水,2 007,2 3(5): 22-25.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133