US EPA ( United States Environmental Protection Agency). The incidence and severity of sediment contamination in surface waters of the United States. Vol. 1: National sediment quality survey. Office of Science and Technology, Washington DC,2004, EPA -823 -R-04 -007, 3.1 -3.60.
[2]
Canfield T J, Dwyer F J, Fairchild J F, et al. Assessing contamination in Great Lakes sediments using benthic invertebrate communities and the sediment quality triad approach. J Great Lakes Res, 1996, 22:565 -583.
[3]
McCarty J P, Secord AL. Reproductive ecology of tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) with high levels of polychlorinated bipheny contamination. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1999, 18:1433 - 1439.
[4]
US EPA. A Guidance Manual to Support the Assessment of Contaminated Sediments in Freshwater Ecosystem Great Lakes National Program Office. Chicago, Illinois. 2002, EPA -905 - 702 -001 - B.
[5]
US EPA, An overview of sediment quality in the United States. Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington DC,and EPA Region 5, Chicago, 1987, EPA -905 -88 -002.
[6]
US EPA. Review of the Agency\'s approach for developing sediment criteria for five metals. Washington DC, 1995, EPASAB - EPEC - 90 - 020.
[7]
Chapman P M, Mann G S. Sediment quality values (SQVs) and ecological risk assessment (ERA). Mar Pollut Bull,1999, 38(5) :339 -344.
[8]
Lee G F, Jones - Lee A. Can chemically-based sediment quality criteria be used as reliable screening tools for water quality impacts? Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry News, 1996, 16(3) :14 - 15.
[9]
Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources. Consensus - Based Sediment Quality Guidelines. Recommendations for Use and Application Interim Guidance. Madison Wisconsin, 2003, WT - 732 - 2003.
[10]
Persaud D, Jaagumagi R, Hayton A. Guidelines for the protections and management of aquatic sediment quality in ontario,Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, Toronto, Ontario, 1993, 0 -7729 -9248 -7.
[11]
Long E R, Morgan LG. The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program. NOAA Technical Memorandum, Seattle, Washington, 1991, NOS OMA 52, Appendices ( 1 ) :175.
[12]
更多...
[13]
CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment) Protocol for the derivation of Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. CCME, 1999, EPC -98E.
[14]
Smith S L, MacDonald DD, Keenleyside K A et al. A preliminary evaluation of sediment quality assessment values for freshwater ecosystems. J Great Lakes Res, 1996, 22:624 - 638.
[15]
US EPA. Calculation and evaluation of sediment effect concentrations for the amphipod Hyalella azteca and the midge Chironomus riparius. Great Lakes National Program Office, Region V, Chicago, IL. 1996, EPA 905 - R96 -008.
[16]
MacDonald D D, Ingersoll CG, Berger T A. Development and evaluation of consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Arch. Environ Toxicol , 2000, 39: 20 - 31.
[17]
EC, MENVIQ (Environment Canada and Ministere de 1Envionnement du Quebec) Interim criteria for quality assessment of St. Lawrence River sediment. Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1992.
[18]
Long ER, MacDonald DD. Recommended uses of empirically derived sediment quality guidelines for marine and estuarine ecosystems. Human Ecolog Risk Assess, 1998, 4:1019 - 1039.
[19]
Kane Driscoll S, Landrum P F, Tigue E. Accumulation and toxicokinetics of fluoranthene in water-only exposures with freshwater amphipods. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1997, 16 (4) :754 - 761.
[20]
US EPA. Sediment classification methods compendium. Office of Water. Washington DC, 1992, EPA 823 - R -92 -006.
[21]
Ankley G T, Katko A, Arthur J W. Identification of ammonia as an important sediment-associated toxicant in the lower Fox River and Green Bay, Wisconsin. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1990, 9: 313 - 322.
[22]
Swartz R C, Cole F A, Lamberson J O, et al. Sediment toxicity, contamination and amphipod abundance at a DDT- and dieldrin-contaminated site in San Francisco Bay. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1994, 13:949 -962.
Ludwig J P, Auman H J, Kurita H, et al. Caspian tern reproduction in the Saginaw bay ecosystem following a 100-year flood event. J Great Lakes Res, 1993: 96 - 108.
[25]
Burton G A. Sediment quality criteria in use around the world. The Japanese Journal of Limnology, 2002, (3) :65 -75.
[26]
Chapman P M, Wang F, Adams W J, et al. Appropriate applications of sediment quality values for metals and metalloids.Environ Sci Tech, 1999, 33(22) :3937 -3941.
[27]
Johnson A, Plotnikoff R. Review of sediment quality data for the Similkameen River. Washington State Department of Ecology, Environmental Assessment Program, Olympia, Washington, 2000, 98504 - 7710.
[28]
NOAA. The Utility of AVS/EqP in hazardous waste site evaluations. NOAA Technical Memorandum Seattle, Washington.1995, NOS ORCA 87, 11-18.
ANZECC (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council). ANZECC interim sediment quality guidelines. Report for the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist. Sydney, Australia, 1997.
[31]
Zarba C S. Equilibrium partitioning approach. In: Sediment classification methods compendium. Office of Water, US EPA,Washington DC, 1992, EPA 823 - R - 92 -006.
[32]
Chapman P M, Allard P J, Vigers G A. Development of sediment quality values for Hong Kong special administrative region:a possible model for other jurisdictions. Mar Pollut Bull, 1999, 38(3 ): 161 - 169.
[33]
Jeremiason J D, Eisenreich S J, Baker JE et al. PCB decline in settling particles and benthic recycling of PCBs and PAHs in Lake Superior. Environmental Science and Technology, 1998, 32:3249 -3256.
[34]
UNEP( the United Nations Environment Programme), IOC (the International Oceanographic Commission) and IMO (the International Maritime Organization), Guidance on Assessment of Sediment Quality. Global Investigation of Pollution in the Marine Environment (GIPME) , IMO, London, 1999: 9- 15.
[35]
Di Toro D. Sediment Toxicity Prediction - What is Known and Unknown, Proceedings of Sediment Quality Assessment, Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management Society, Chicago, IL 2002.
[36]
Landrum PF, Gossiaux DC, Kukkonen J. Sediment characteristics influencing the bioavailability of nonpolar organic contaminants to Diporeia spp. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 1997, 9:43 -55.
[37]
Horowitz AJ and Elrick KA. The relation of stream sediment surface area, grain size, and composition to trace element chemistry. Applied Geochemistry, 1987, 2:437 -451.
[38]
Di Toro D M, Mahony J D, Hansen D J, et al. Toxicity of cadmium in sediments: the role of acid volatile sulfide. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1990, 9:1487 - 1502.
[39]
Meador J P. The interaction of pH, dissolved organic carbon, and total copper in the determination of ionic copper and toxicity. Aquatic Toxicology, 1991, 19:13 -32.
[40]
Lacey R, Watzin M C, McIntosh A W. Sediment organic matter content as a confounding factor in toxicity tests with Chironomustentans. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1998, 18 ( 2 ) :231 - 236.
[41]
Mahony J D, Di Toro D M, Gonzalez A M, et al. A sediment component in addition to acid volatile sulfide that may further control toxicity to metals. Abstracts. 12th Annual Meeting, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Cincinnati,Ohio, 1991, 3 -7-91.
[42]
Peterson G S, Ankley G T, Leonard E N. Effect of bioturbation of metal-sulfide oxidation in surficial freshwater sediments.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1996, 15:2147 - 2155.
[43]
ASTM ( American Society for Testing and Materials). Standard test methods for measuring the toxicity of sediment-associated contaminants with fresh water invertebrates In: Annual book of ASTM standards, water and environmental technology. Philadelphia, 2000, Volume 11.05 (E1706-95).
[44]
MacDonald D D. Approach to the Assessment of Sediment Quality in Florida Coastal Waters. Vol. 1 - Development and Evaluation of Sediment Quality Assessment Guidelines Chapter 3 - An Evaluation of Existing Approaches to Developing Numerical Sediment Quality Guidelines. British Columbia, VOR 2E0, 1994: 15 - 62.
