全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2015 

合意型行政争议解决机制刍议

Keywords: 行政争议解决, 合意, 自行协商, 调解, 合作治理

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

转型期社会的秩序需求,要求创新现有的行政争议解决机制,寻求拓展纠纷解决的可能空间。而包括自行协商、调解等制度在内的合意型行政争议解决机制,既契合于纠纷当事人的内在需求,又因应了现代行政法上的合作治理趋势,是一种可行的制度选择。合意型纠纷解决机制虽起源于民事纠纷解决领域之中,但它并非难以与行政争议解决活动相兼容。从参与主体、合意形成程序、协议效力等方面展开制度设计,可以确保合意型行政争议解决运行的合法性与实效性。合意型行政争议解决机制与决定型行政争议解决机制呈现出交织共生的关系,它们之间的相互竞争,有助于提升行政争议解决的整体品质。

References

[1]  章剑生. 《行政诉讼法》修改的基本方向――以《行政诉讼法》第1条为中心 [J]. 苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,(1).
[2]  王锡锌. 规则、合意与治理――行政过程中ADR适用的可能性与妥当性研究 [J]. 法商研究,2003,(5).
[3]  余军. 私法纠纷解决模式在行政法上的运用――替代性纠纷解决(ADR)之理论原型、妥当性及其影响 [J]. 法治研究,2007,(4).
[4]  [日]棚濑孝雄. 纠纷的解决与审判制度 [M]. 王亚新,译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社,1994.
[5]  Genevra Richardson,Hazel Genn. Tribunals in Transition: Resolution or Adjudication? [J]. Public Law,2007.
[6]  Patricia M. Wald et al.. Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution: Better Ways to Resolve Some Public Sector Controversies [J]. Administrative Law Journal,1987,(1).
[7]  Carolyn Hay,Katharine Mckenna,Trevor Buck. Evaluation of Early Neutral Evaluation Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Social Security and Child Support Tribunal [R]. MOJ Research Series 2/10,2010.
[8]  John Hardin Young. Private Perspective on ADR in Federal Contract Disputes [C] // Marshall J. Breger (ed.),Federal Administrative Dispute Resolution Deskbook. Chicago: American Bar Association,2001.
[9]  Cynthia B. Dauber. The Ties that Do Not Bind: Nonbinding Arbitration in Federal Administrative Agencies [J]. Administrative Law Journal of American University,1995,(9).
[10]  王胜俊. 最高人民法院工作报告――2010年3月11日在第十一届全国人民代表大会第三次会议上 [R]. 最高人民法院公报,2010,(4).
[11]  王胜俊. 最高人民法院工作报告――2012年3月11日在第十一届全国人民代表大会第五次会议上 [R]. 最高人民法院公报,2012,(4).
[12]  William F. Smith. Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution: Practices and Possibilities in the Federal Government [J]. Missouri Journal of Dispute Resolution,1984.
[13]  Lawrence E. Susskind,Sarah McKearnan. The Evolution of Public Policy Dispute Resolution [J]. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research,2007,(16).
[14]  Maurice Sunkin. Withdrawing: A Problem in Judicial Review? [C] // Peter Leyland and Terry Woods (eds.). Administrative Law Facing the Future: Old Constrains & New Horizons. London: Blackstone Press Limited,1997.
[15]  R. (on the application of Cowl) v Plymouth City Council,1 W. L. R. 803 (2002).
[16]  [德]Thomas Würtenberger. 德国行政诉讼法之新发展 [J]. 刘建宏,译. 国立中正大学法学集刊,2009,(1).
[17]  陈新民. 和为贵――论行政协调的法制改革 [J]. 行政法学研究,2007,(3).
[18]  [日]小早川光郎. 行政诉讼的构造分析 [M]. 王天华,译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社,2014.
[19]  [美]朱迪?弗里曼. 合作治理与新行政法 [M]. 毕洪海,陈标冲,译. 北京: 商务印书馆,2010.
[20]  Sophie Boyron. Mediation in Administrative Law: the Identification of Conflicting Paradigms [J]. European Public Law 2007,(13).
[21]  Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem,Irene Lamb. Negotiation and Mediation in the Public Sector: the German Experience [J]. Public Administration,1994,(72).
[22]  [比]马克?范?胡克. 法律的沟通之维 [M]. 孙国东,译. 北京: 法律出版社,2008.
[23]  Sophie Boyon. The Rise of Mediation in Administrative Law Disputes: Experiences from England,France and Germany [J]. Public Law,2006.
[24]  张旭勇. 论行政诉讼和解的正当性困境及其化解 [J]. 法商研究,2010,(5).
[25]  Susan L. Carpenter,W.J.D. Kennedy. Managing Public Disputes: A Practical Guide for Government,Business,and Citizen’s Group [M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,2001.
[26]  The Law Commission. Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the Citizen: A Consultation Paper [R]. The Law Commission Consultation Paper No. 187,2008.
[27]  The Office of the Chairman of Administrative Conference of the United States. An Overview of Federal Agency Use of Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution [J]. Administrative Law Journal,1987,(1).
[28]  Philip J. Harter. Neither Cop nor Collection Agent: Encouraging Administrative Settlements by Ensuring Mediator Confidentiality [J]. Administrative Law Review,1989,(41).
[29]  Brett A. Williams. Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Policy Disputes [J]. Journal of Dispute Resolution,2000.
[30]  季卫东. 法治秩序的建构 [M]. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社,1999.
[31]  Harry T. Edwards. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Panacea or Anathema? [J]. Harvard Law Review,1986,(99).
[32]  [美]陆诗礼. 邓小平之后的中国纠纷解决:再谈“毛泽东和调解”[C]. 矫波,译 // 强世功,编. 调解、法制与现代化:中国调解制度研究. 北京: 中国法制出版社,2001.
[33]  [德]鲁道夫?冯?耶林. 为权利而斗争[M]. 胡宝海,译. 北京: 中国法制出版社,2004.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133