全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
华西医学  2011 

交叉抗原表达的急性白血病的临床生物学特征分析

, PP. 1687-1689

Keywords: 急性白血病,交叉抗原表达,免疫分型,缓解率

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

【】 目的 分析交叉抗原表达的急性白血病的临床特征及缓解率。 方法 对2009年10月-2010年11月血液内科的210例交叉表达髓系和淋巴细胞系相关抗原的初治急性白血病患者的标本,采用流式细胞术检测白血病细胞的免疫表型,根据免疫标记和FAB(French、American、Britain)分型进行分组,分析其异质性的生物学特征和影响缓解率的相关因素。 结果 210例急性白血病的FAB分型以AML-M1/M2(82例)和ALL(78例)为主;免疫分型以B淋巴细胞系和髓系混合表达多见(116例),其中CD34表达率高达91.4%(192例),CD7表达率为50.5%(106例),且与CD34相关(P=0.04);出现CD34、CD7、CD19三者共表达的患者缓解率较低(9.09%)。 结论 交叉抗原表达的急性白血病的诊断有赖于免疫分型的判断,其分化抗原的表达类型是影响其缓解率的重要因素。【Abstract】 Objective Toobservetheclinicalcharactersofacuteleukemiawithcross-lineageantigenexpressionandanalyzetheremissionrate. Methods BetweenOctober2009andNovember2010,210patientswerediagnosedandclassifiedbymorphology.Cytochemistryandimmunologywereusedtoanalyzetheimmunophenotype.AccordingtotheimmunostainingrelativefactorsandFAB(French,American,andBritain)phenotypestandard,thesamplesweredividedintoseveralgroups.Theconicalcharactersandrelativefactorsofremissionratewereanalyzed. Results In210patientswithcross-lineageantigenexpression,AL,AML-M1/M2(82cases)andALL(78cases)werecommoninFABphenotype,andcross-lineageofBlineageandmyelolineagewerecommoninimmunotype(116cases).CD34gotthehighestexpressionfrequencyofall(192cases),andhadthemostimportanteffectonpatients′prognosis.CD7wasalsopositivecommonly(106cases)andrelatedwithCD34(P=0.04).Soit′ssignificantfortheoutcome.Thepatientswhogotco-expressionofCD34,CD7andCD19hadworseprognoses. Conclusions Acuteleukemiawithcross-lineageantigenexpressionisaspecialtypeandisconfirmedbyimmunotype.Furthermore,expressiontypesofdifferentiationantigenarecriticalfortheprognosis.

References

[1]   Xu XQ, Wang JM, Lü SQ, et al. Clinical and biological characteristics of adult biphenotypic acute leukemia in comparison with that of acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case series of a Chinese population[J]. Haematologica, 2009, 94(7): 919-927.
[2]   Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knappe W, et al. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL)[J]. Leukemia, 1995, 9(10): 1783-1786.
[3]   Mejstrikova E, Volejnikova J, Fronkova E, et al. Prognosis of children with mixed phenotype acute leukemia treated on the basis of consistent immunophenotypic criteria[J]. Haemotologica, 2010, 95(6): 928-935.
[4]   Drexler HG, Thiel E, Ludwig WD. Acute myeloid leukemias expressing lymphoid-associated antigens: diagnostic incidence and prognostic significance[J]. Leukemia, 1993, 7(4): 489-498.
[5]   肖志坚, 郝玉书. 免疫表型与急性白血病的诊断[J]. 中华血液学杂志, 1997, 18(3): 53-55.
[6]   Kita K, Miwa H, Nakase K, et al. Clinical importance of CD7 expression in acute myelocytic leukemia[J]. Blood, 1993, 81(9): 2399-2405.
[7]   李耀华, 徐娟. CD7在成人急性髓细胞白血病的表达及在微小残留病检测中的应用[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2006, 27(2): 233-234.
[8]   Legrand O, Perrot JY, Simonin G, et al. Adult biphenotypic acute leukemia: an entity with poor prognosis which is related to unfavourable cytogenetics and P-glycoprotein over-expression[J]. Br J Haematol, 1998, 100(1): 147-155.
[9]   Suzuki R, Nakamura S. Malignancies of natural killer (NK) cell precursor: myeloid/NK cell precursor acute leukemia and blastic NK celllymphoma/leukemia[J]. Leuk Res, 1999, 23(7): 615-624.
[10]   Daniels JT, Davis BJ, Houde-McGrail L, et al. Clonal selection of CD56+ t(8;21) AML blasts: further suggestion of the adverse clinical significance of this biological marker[J]. Br J Haematol, 1999, 107(2): 381-383.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133