全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

不同产脂量云南松树脂道解剖学比较研究

Keywords: 云南松 树脂道 产脂力 解剖结构

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为确定高产脂云南松的早期选择指标, 采用石蜡切片法对不同海拔、不同产脂量云南松的针叶、树干韧皮部和木质部的组成性树脂道特征进行解剖观察, 结果表明:高产脂与低产脂云南松的针叶树脂道个数、树干木质部树脂道密度、韧皮部树脂道大小及单位长度树脂道数量存在极显著差异(P<0.01), 但不同海拔之间无显著差异;高、低海拔高产脂云南松针叶树脂道数量分别比低产脂的高38.89%、30.34%, 树干木质部树脂道密度分别高58.06%、48.48%, 韧皮部树脂道大小分别高32.20%、29.73%, 韧皮部单位长度树脂道数量分别高21.95%、38.51%。说明针叶树脂道数量、树干木质部树脂道密度及韧皮部树脂道大小3项指标, 也可作为云南松产脂力评价的部分指标

References

[1]  安宁, 丁贵杰. 广西马尾松松脂的化学组成研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(3):59-62.
[2]  曹逸霞, 张真, 刘随存, 等. 针叶树树脂的抗害功能及抗害机制[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2007, 44(6):804-810.
[3]  李爱民, 王玉荣, 吴鸿. 马尾松主要器官树脂道的发生和发育[J]. 林业科学, 2008, 44(9):36-40.
[4]  李青青, 段焰青, 叶辉, 等. 针叶树对小蠹虫的防御机制[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2007, 26(7):21-24, 44.
[5]  朱秋云, 黄益江. 马尾松树脂道与产脂力的回归分析研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2002, 29(4):15-16, 55.
[6]  Nagy N E, Krokene P, Solheim H. Anatomical-based defense responses of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stems to two fungal pathogens[J]. Tree Physiology, 2006, 26(2):159-167.
[7]  Krokene P, Nagy N E, Solheim H. Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection[J]. Tree Physiology, 2008, 28(1):29-35.
[8]  Martin D. Methyl Jasmonate Induces Traumatic Oleoresin Ducts, Terpenoid Oleoresin Biosynthesis, and Terpenoid Accumulation in Developing Xylem of Norway Spruce Stems[J]. Plant Physiology, 2002, 129(3):1003-1018.
[9]  Rosner S, Hannrup B. Resin canal traits relevant for constitutive resistance of Norway spruce against bark beetles: environmental and genetic variability.[J] Forest Ecology and Management, 2004, 200(1-3):77-78.
[10]  Gerson E A, Kelsey R G, St Clair J B. Genetic variation of piperidine alkaloids in Pinus ponderosa: a common garden study[J]. Annals of Botany, 2009, 3(103), 447-457.
[11]  Roberds J H, Strom B L, Hain F P. Estimates of genetic parameters for oleoresin and growth traits in juvenile loblolly pine[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003, 12(33): 2469-2476.
[12]  Moreira X, Alfaro R I, King J. Constitutive defenses and damage in Sitka spruce progeny obtained from crosses between white pine weevil resistant and susceptible parents[J]. Forestry, 2012, 85(1):87-97.
[13]  Franceschi V R, Krokene P, Christiansen E, et al. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests[J]. New Phytologist, 2005, 167(2):353-376.
[14]  King J N, Alfaro R I. Developing Sitka Spruce Populations for Resistance to the White Pine Weevil: Summary of Research and Breeding Program. BC Ministry of Forests and Range[R], British Columbia: Ministry of Forests and Range Forest Science Program, 2009.
[15]  King J N, Alfaro R I, Grau Lopez M, et al. Resistance of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) to white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi): characterizing the bark defence mechanisms of resistant populations[J]. Forestry, 2011, 84(1):83-91.
[16]  楼浙辉, 舒洪岚. 松树高产脂力遗传改良的研究进展[J]. 江西林业科技, 2002, (5): 40-41.
[17]  吴鸿, 胡正海. 油松树脂道结构及与树脂产生和分泌的关系[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 1995, 25(5):529-532.
[18]  穆茹, 王曙光, 普晓兰. 高、低产脂思茅松树脂道的解剖学比较[J]. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26(02):49-53.
[19]  云南松编委会, 金振洲, 彭鉴主编. 云南松[M]. 云南科技出版社, 2004.
[20]  李正理, 樊拥军, 崔克明. 云南松与地盘松木材结构比较观察[J]. 植物学报, 1994, 36(7):502-505.
[21]  赵昱, 刘占林. 5种松树针叶解剖结构的数量分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(2) :19-24.
[22]  Karanikas C, Walker V, Scaltsoyiannes A, et al. High vs. low yielding oleoresin Pinus halepensis Mill. trees GC terpenoids profiling as diagnostic tool[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2010, 67(4):412p1-412p8.
[23]  毛晓霞. 石蜡切片制作方法的改良[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(08):15-17.
[24]  翁海龙, 陈宏伟, 段安安. 思茅松高产脂优树选择[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(3):71-74, 79.
[25]  祝志勇, 于建云. 生态因子对马尾松产脂的影响初探[J]. 华东森林经理, 2002, 16(3):35-37.
[26]  朱秋云, 黄益江. 马尾松树脂道与产脂力的回归分析研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2002, 29(4):15-16.
[27]  李思广, 蒋云东, 李明. 思茅松树脂道数量与产脂力回归关系研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2007, 34(1):59-62.
[28]  庄伟瑛, 张玉英, 邹元熹. 高产脂湿地松选择和相关因子的分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2007, 29(1):55-60, 65.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133