Arn H, Stadler E, Rauscher S. The electroantennographic detector-a selective and sensitive tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones[J]. Zeitschrift fitr Naturforschung, 1975, 30c:722-725
[2]
Schroder L M. Olfactory recognition of nonhost aspen and birch by conifer bark beetle Tomicus pinipenta and Hylurgops palliates[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1992,18:1583-1593
[3]
Ross D W, Datermen G E. Efficacy of antiaggregation pheromone for reducing douglas-fir beetle infestation in high risk stands[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1995, 127:805-811
[4]
Leather S R, Watt A F. Insest-induced chemical changes in yang lodgpole pine(Pinus contorta); the effect of previous defoliation on oviposition, growth and survival of the pine beauty moth,Panolis flammea[J]. Ecological Entomology, 1987, 12: 275-281
[5]
Byers J A. Effect of mating on terminating aggregation during host colonization in the bark beetle, Ips paraconfusus[J] Journal of Chemical Ecology,1981a,7(1): 1135-1146
Ting D T, Turner D P, Weber J A. Factors controlling the emissions of monoterpenes and other volatile organic compounds [M]// Sharkey T D, Holland E A, Mooney H A. Trace Gas Emissions by Plants. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego,1991:93-119
[10]
Charron C S, Cantiliffe D J, Heath R R. Volatile emissions from plants[J]. Horticultural Review, 1995, 17:43-72
[11]
Guenther A B, Monson R K, Fall R. Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: observations with eucalyptus and emission rate algorithm development[J]. Journal of Guophysical Research, 1991, 96: 10799-10808
[12]
Dement W A, Tyson B J, Mooney H A. Mechanism of monoterpene volatilization in Salvia mellifera[J]. Phytochemistry, 1975, 14:2555-2557
[13]
Kamiysma K, Takai T, Yamanaka Y. Correlation between volatile substances released from plants and meteorological conditions . White E T, Hetherington P, Thiele B R. Proceedings from the International Clean Air Conferece, Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan,1978:365-372
[14]
Tingey D T, Manning M, Ratsch H C, et al. Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine[J]. Plant Physiology, 1980, 65:797-801
[15]
Yukouchi Y, Ambe Y. Factors affecting the emission of monoterpenes from red pine (Pinus densiflora)[J]. Plant Physiology, 1984, 75:1009-1012
[16]
Staudt M, Seufert G. Light-dependent emission of monoterpenes by holm oak (Quercus ilex L.)[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1995, 82:89-92
[17]
Gleizes M, Pauly G, Bernard-Dagan C, et al.. Effects of light on terpene hydrocarbon synthesis in pinus pinaster[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1980, 50:16-20
[18]
Hall G D, Langenheim J H. Temporal changes in the leaf monoterpenes of Sequoia sempervirens[J]. Biochemical systematics and Ecology, 1986, 14:61-69
[19]
Jakus R. A method for the protection of spruce stands against Ips typographus by the use of barriers of pheromone traps in north-eastern Slovakia[J]. Anzeiger fur schadlingskunde pflanzenschutz umweltschutz, 1998, 71: 152-158
[20]
Shea P J, Neustein M. Protection of a rare stand of Torrey pine from Ips paraconfusus. Application of Semiochemicals for Management of Bark Beetle Infestations // Salom S M,Hobson K R. Proceedings of an Informal Conference, USDA, Forest Service. General Technical Report INT: GTR-318, 1995:123-456
[21]
Harley P, Fridd-Stroud V, Greenberg J, et al.. Emission of 2-methyl-3-buten-2-ol by pines:a potentially large natural source of reactive carbon to the atmosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1998, 103(25):479-486
[22]
Strom B L, Roton L M, Goyer R A, et al.. Visual and semiochemical disruption of host finding in the southern pine beetle[J]. Ecological Applications, 1999, 9: 1028-1038
[23]
Campbell S A,Borden J H. Integration of visual and olfactory cues of hosts and non-hosts by three bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) [J]. Ecological Entomology, 2006, 31(5): 437-449
[24]
Campbell S A,Borden J H. Close-range, in-flight integration of olfactory and visual information by a host- seeking bark beetle[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2006, 120(2): 91-98
[25]
Campbell S A, Borden J H. Additive and synergistic integration of multimodal cues of both hosts and non-hosts during host selection by woodboring insects[J]. Oikos, 2009, 118(4): 553-563
[26]
Wood S L. The Bark and Ambrosia Beetles (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) of North and Central America: A Taxonomic Monograph .Great Basin Natural Memograph, Brigham Young University Provo, Utah, 1982, no 6
[27]
Kelley S T, Farrel B D. Is specialization a dead end? The phylogeny of host use in Dendroctonus bark beetles (Scolytidae) [J]. Evolution, 1998, 52:1731-1743
[28]
Sequeira A S, Normark B B, Farrell B D. Evolutionary assembly of the conifer fauna: distinguishing ancient from recent associations in bark beetles . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (B), 2000, 267:2359-2366
[29]
Dethier V G. Mechanism of host-plant recognition [J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 1982, 31:49-56
[30]
Visser J H. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects [J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1986, 31:121-144
[31]
Dobson H E M. Floral volatiles in insect biology. Insect Plant Interactions[M], vol. 5.Bernays E A. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida, USA,1994: 47-81
[32]
Bernays E A. Plant-insect interactions-a synthesis . Abstract Book I. XXI-International Congress of Entomology. August. International Congress of Entomology, Brazil, 2000: Vlll-Xlll.20-26
[33]
Atkins M D. Behavioral variation among scolytids in relation to their habitat [J]. Canadian Entomologist, 1966, 98:285-288
[34]
Raffa K F, Benyman A A. Interacting selective pressures in conifer bark beetle systems: a basis for reciprocal adaptations[J] American Naturalist, 1987, 129: 234-262
[35]
Byers J A. Host tree chemistry affecting colonization in bark beetles[M]// Carde R T, Bell W J. Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. Chapman and Hall, New Yark, 1995:154-213
[36]
Borden J H. Disruption of semiochemical-mediated aggregation in bark beetles [M]// Carde R T, Minks A K. Pheromone Research:New Directions,1997:421-438
[37]
Schlyter F, Birgersson Cz. Forest Beetles[M]// Hardic R J,Minks A. Pheromones of Non-Lepidopteran Insects Associated with Agricultural Plants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK,1999: 113-148
[38]
Petersonnjk H E. Squash legal and ulartrichome volatile: identification and influence on behavior of female pickleworm moth Diaphania nitidalis[J]. Chemical Ecology, 1994, 20:2099-2109.
[39]
Paulwp J. Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores[J]. Plant Physiology, 1999,121:325-331
[40]
Muller T L. Volatile organic compounds emitted from beech leaves[J]. Phytochemistry, 1996,43:759-762
Boren J H, Bennett R B, Acontinuously recording flight mile for investigating the effects of volatile substance on the flight of the red insect[J]. Ecolentomol,1969, 62(4):782-785
[43]
Byers J A. An encounter rate model of bark beetle populations searching at random for susceptible host trees[J]. Ecological Model,1996, 91:57-66
[44]
Zhang Q H. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer bark beetles . Ph.D. Thesis (Agraria 264). Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Alnarp, Sweden, 2001
Zhang Q H, Birgerss G., Zhu J W, et al.. Leaf volatiles from nonhost deciduous trees:variation by tree species, season,and temperature and electrophysiological activity in Ips typographus[J].Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1999a, 25(8):1923-1943
[47]
Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Anderson P. Green leaf volatiles interrupt pheromone response of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1999b, 25(12):2847-2861
[48]
Wilson L M, Borden J H, Gries R, et al.. Green leaf volatiles as antiaggregants for the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) [J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1996, 22: 1861-1875
[49]
Schlyter F, Zhang Q H, Anderson P, et al.. Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of pine shoot beetles, Tomicus piniperda and T. minor (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), to non-host leaf and bark volatiles[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 2000, 132: 965-98
[50]
Wood D L.The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles[J]. Annual Review of Entomology,1982, 27: 411-446
[51]
Jactel H, van Halder I, Menassieu P, et al.. Non-host volatiles disrupt the response of the stenographer bark beetle Ips sexdentatus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromone baited traps and maritime pine log[J].Integrated Pest Management Reviews, 2001, 6:197-207
[52]
Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, Birgersson G. Bark volatiles from non-host deciduous trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus(L.) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis[J]. Chemoecology, 2000, 10: 69-80
[53]
ZHANG Long-wa, Nancy E G, SUN Jiang-hua. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Dendroctonus valens to non-host volatiles[J]. Annual Forest Science, 2007, 64: 267-273
[54]
Guerrero A, Feixas J, Pajares J, et al.. Semiochemically induced inhibition of behaviour of Tomicus destruens(Woll) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1997, 84: 155-157
[55]
Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, et al. Two pheromones of coniferophagous bark beetles found in the bark of nonhost angiosperms[J]. Journal of chemical ecology, 1999, 25: 805-816
[56]
Huber D P W, Gries R, Borden J H, et al.. A survey of antennal responses by five species of conniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees[J]. Chemoecology, 2000a, 10: 103-113
[57]
Morewood W D, Simmonds K E, Gries R, et al.. Disruption by conophthotin of the kairomone response of sawyer beetles to bark beetle pheromones[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2003, 29(9): 2115-2129
[58]
Byers J A. Attraction of bark beetles,Tomicus piniperda,Hylurgops palliates,and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1992, 18(12): 2385-2402
[59]
Zhang Q H, Liu G T, Schlyter F, et al.. Olfactory response of Ips duplicatus to nonhost leaf and bark volatiles in Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2001, 27: 955-1009
[60]
Ross D W, Datermen G E. Efficacy of antiaggregation pheromone for reducing douglas-fir beetle infestation in high risk stands[J]. The Canadian Entomologist, 1995,127:805-811
[61]
Wood D L. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and and allomones in the host selection and colonization of bark beetles[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1982, 27:411-446
Gries G. Prospects of new semiochemicals and technologies. Application of Semiochemical for Management of Bark Beetle infestations //Salom S M,Hobson K R. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report. INT-GTR-318,1995:44-47
[64]
Kohnle U. Host and non-host odour signals governing host selection by the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda and the spruce bark beetle, Hylurgops palliatus (Col., Scolytidae) [J]. Journal of Applied Entomology, 2004, 128(9-10):588-592
[65]
Dickens J C, Billings R F, Payne T L. Green leaf volatiles interrupt aggregation pheromone response in bark beetles infecting pines[J]. Experientia, 1992, 48: 523-524
[66]
Byers J A, Zhang Q H, Schlyter F, et al.. Volatiles from non-host birch tree inhabit pheromone response in spruce bark beetles[J]. Naturwissenschaften, 1998, 85: 557-561
[67]
Groot P D E. Green leaf volatiles inhabit response of red pine cone beetle Conophthorus resinosae(Coleopter, Scolytide) to a sex pheromone[J]. Natutwissenschaften,1999, 86(2): 81-85
[68]
Zhang Q H.Interruption of aggregation pheromones in Ips typographus (L.) (Col. Scolytidae) by non-host bark volatiles[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entommology, 2003, 5(2): 142-152.
[69]
Fettig C J, Borys R R, Dabney C P, et al.. Disruption of red turpentine attraction to baited traps by the addition of California five spined ips pheromone components[J]. Canadian Entomology, 2005, 137:748-752
[70]
Teranishi R, Kint S. Bioactive volatile compounds from plants: an overview [M]//Teranishi R. Buttery R G ,Sugisawa H. Bioactive Volatile Compounds from Plants. American Chemical Society, Washington,D.C., 1993: 1-5
[71]
Robinson T. The organic Constituents of Higher Plants[M], Cordus Press, North Amherst, MA, 1983
[72]
Metcalf R L, Metcalf E R. Plant Kairomones in Insect Ecology and Control[M]. Chapman &Hall, Academic Press, New York, 1992
[73]
Francke W, Bartels J, Meyer H, et al.. Semiochemicals from bark beetles:new results,remarks,and reflections[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1995, 21:1043-1063
[74]
Borden J H, Wilson I M, Gries R, et al.. Volatiles from the bark of trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx.(Salicaceae) disrupt secondary attraction by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera:Scolytide)[J]. Chemoecology, 1998, 8: 69-75
[75]
Zhang Q H, Tollasch T, Schlyter F, et al.. Enantiospecific antennal response by bark beetle (Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to the spiroacetal E-conophthorin[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2002, 28:1839-1852
[76]
Tollsten L, Knudsen J T. Floral scent in deciduous Salix (Salicaceae)-acue determining the pollination system? [J] Plant Systematics and Evolution, 1992, 82: 229-237
[77]
Millar J G,Haynes K F. Methods in Chemical Ecology:Chemical Methods[M]. Kluwer. Norwel, 1998
[78]
Huber D P W, Borden, J H, Stastny M. Response of the pine engraver, Ips pini(Say) (Coleoptera:Scolytidae), to conophthorin and other angiosperm, bark volatiles in the avoidance of non-hosts[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2001, 3:225-232
[79]
Payne T L. Pheromone perception. [M] // Birch M C. Pheromones. Elsevier-North Holland Publishers Amsterdam,1974: 31-61
[80]
Isidorov V A, Zenkevich I G, Ioffe B V. Volatile organic compounds in the Atmosphere of forests[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1985, 19:1-8
[81]
Kimmerer T W, Kozlowski T T. Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde, and ethanol production by plants under stress[J]. Plant Physiology, 1982, 69:840-847
[82]
Pare P W, Tumlinson J H. Plant volatile signals in response to herbivore feeding[J]. Florida Entomologist, 1996, 79:93-103
[83]
Winer A M, Arey J, Atkinson R, et al.. Emission rates of organics from vegetation in California？s central valley[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1992, 26A:2647-2659
[84]
Zhang Q H, Schlyter F. Olfactory recognition and behavioural avoidance of angiosperm nonhost volatiles by conifer-inhabiting bark beetles[J]. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2004, 6:1-19
[85]
Vite J P, Baader E. Present and future use of semiochemical in pest management of bark beetle[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1990, 16: 3031-3041
[86]
Byers J A, Zhang Q H, Birgersson G. Strategies of a bark beetle, Pityogenes bidentatus, in an olfactory landscape[J]. Natururwissenscenschaften, 2000, 87:503-507
[87]
Erbilgin N, Raffa K F. Opposing effects of host monoterpenes on responses by two sympatric species of bark beetle to their aggregation pheromones[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2000, 26:2527-2548
[88]
Huber D P W, Borden J H. Protection of lodgepole pines from mass attack by mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae, with nonhost angiosperm volatiles and verbenone[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2001b, 99:131-141
[89]
Borden J H, Chong L J, Earle T J, et al.. Protection of logepole pine from attack by the mountain pine beetle Dendroctonus ponderosae(Coleoptera:Scolytide) using high dose of verbenone in combination with nonhost bark volatiles[J]. The forestry Chronicle, 2003, 79:685-691
