| [1] | 陈午楼.从长篇小说发展到长篇评话——扬州评话话本发展规律探索\[J\].扬州师院学报, 1985(4):107-115.
|
| [2] | FAUCONNIER G,TURNER M. Conceptual integration networks\[J\]. Cognitive Science, 1998(2):133-187.
|
| [3] | 董国炎.扬州评话论纲\[J\]. 扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2004(4): 39-45.
|
| [4] | 董国炎.扬州评话研究\[M\].北京：社会科学文献出版社, 2009.
|
| [5] | FILLMORE C. The case for case reopened\[C\]//Cole P, SADOCK J. Syntax and semantics: grammatical relations. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press, 1977.
|
| [6] | SCHANK R, ABELSON R. Script, plans, goals and understanding\[M\]. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1977.
|
| [7] | 祁淑惠.论扬州评话的兴衰及艺术探源\[J\].艺术百家, 2002(3): 13-15.
|
| [8] | 董国炎.扬州评话研究\[M\].北京：社会科学文献出版社, 2009.
|
| [9] | 欧阳健. 武松形象的衍变——兼谈扬州评话对《水浒》的继承和发展\[J\].扬州师院学报, 1981(2):48-53.
|
| [10] | 汪花荣.扬州评话王派《水浒》与小说《水浒传》比较研究\[J\]. 明清小说研究, 2012 (4): 96-108.
|
| [11] | BARLETT.Remembering\[M\]. London:CUP,1932.
|
| [12] | HALLIDAY M, HASAN R. Cohesion in English\[M\]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社, 2007.
|
| [13] | 祁淑惠.论扬州评话的兴衰及艺术探源\[J\].艺术百家, 2002(3): 13-15.
|
| [14] | 易德波.扬州评话探讨\[M\].北京:人民文学出版社, 2006.
|
| [15] | 陈午楼.扬州评话与民俗学——兼谈民族审美心理\[J\]. 扬州师院学报, 1985(12):95-103.
|
| [16] | 陈午楼.默契—扬州评话审美功能之探索\[J\]. 扬州师院学报, 1987(7): 159-166.
|
| [17] | 易德波.扬州评话探讨\[M\].北京:人民文学出版社, 2006.
|
| [18] | 陈午楼.扬州评话与民俗学——兼谈民族审美心理\[J\]. 扬州师院学报, 1985(12):95-103.
|
| [19] | 陈午楼.默契—扬州评话审美功能之探索\[J\]. 扬州师院学报, 1987(7): 159-166.
|
| [20] | 王资鑫.谈王少堂说《武松》的武打特色——兼谈武打在文艺作品中的意义和地位\[J\].文艺研究, 1981(5): 22-30.
|
| [21] | 徐德明，李真. 从“王派《水浒》”看扬州评话的艺术形态特征\[J\]. 扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版），2006（2）：39-43.
|
| [22] | 欧阳健. 武松形象的衍变——兼谈扬州评话对《水浒》的继承和发展\[J\].扬州师院学报, 1981(2):48-53.
|
| [23] | 王资鑫.谈王少堂说《武松》的武打特色——兼谈武打在文艺作品中的意义和地位\[J\].文艺研究, 1981(5): 22-30.
|
| [24] | 徐德明，李真. 从“王派《水浒》”看扬州评话的艺术形态特征\[J\]. 扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版），2006（2）：39-43.
|
| [25] | PIAGE J. The Mechanisms of perception\[M\]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.
|
| [26] | 汪花荣.扬州评话王派《水浒》与小说《水浒传》比较研究\[J\]. 明清小说研究, 2012 (4): 96-108.
|
| [27] | BARLETT.Remembering\[M\]. London:CUP,1932.
|
| [28] | PIAGE J. The Mechanisms of perception\[M\]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.
|
| [29] | RUMEHART D. Note on a schema for stories\[C\]//BOBROW D, COLLINS A. Representation and understanding:studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
|
| [30] | RUMEHART D. Note on a schema for stories\[C\]//BOBROW D, COLLINS A. Representation and understanding:studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
|
| [31] | TURNER M. The literary mind\[M\]. London: CUP, 1996.
|
| [32] | UNGERER F, SCHEMID H. An introduction to cognitive linguistics\[M\]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社,2001.
|
| [33] | LAKOFF G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind\[M\]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1987.
|
| [34] | LANGACKER R. Essentials of cognitive grammar\[M\]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
|
| [35] | STOCKWELL P. Cognitive poetics, an introduction\[M\]. London: Routledge, 2002
|
| [36] | TURNER M. The literary mind\[M\]. London: CUP, 1996.
|
| [37] | UNGERER F, SCHEMID H. An introduction to cognitive linguistics\[M\]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社,2001.
|
| [38] | LAKOFF G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind\[M\]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,1987.
|
| [39] | FAUCONNIER G,TURNER M. The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind′s hidden complexities\[M\]. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
|
| [40] | CROFT W, CRUSE D. Cognitive linguistics\[M\]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2006.
|
