[1] | NIU M. Influence of Protogenetic Sulfate Double Salts on PortlandCement Volume Stability (in Chinese, dissertation). Chongqing:Chongqing University, 2014.
|
[2] | MANDER J, ADAMS L, LARKIN E. A method for the determinationof some minor compounds in Portland cement and clinker by X-raydiffraction[J]. Cem Concr Res, 1974, 4(4): 533–544.
|
[3] | TWOMEY C, BIRKINSHAW C, BREEN S. The identity of thesulfur–containing phases present in cement clinker manufactured usinga high sulfur petroleum coke fuel[J]. J Chem Technol Biot, 2004, 79(5):486–490.
|
[4] | MA Y, QIAN J, YANG S, et al. Measuring the quantitative distributionof sulfate phases in cement[J]. Adv Cem Res, 2015 (Accepted).
|
[5] | GARTNER E M, TANG F J. Formation and properties of high sulfatePortland cement clinkers[J]. Cement, 1987, 84(2): 141–164.
|
[6] | STRUBLE L J. The influence of cement pore solution on alkali-silicareaction[M]. US Department of Commerce: National Bureau ofStandards, 1987.
|
[7] | POLLITT H W, BROWN A W. The distribution of alkalis in Portlandcement clinker [C]//Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 5thInternational Symposium on the Chemistry of Cement, Tokyo, 1968, 1:322–333.
|
[8] | JONS E. Measuring the solubility of sulfate in cement[J]. World CemRes Dev, 1996, 27(6): 65–68.
|
[9] | TAYLOR H. Sulfates in Portland clinker and cement [C]//Proceedingsof the PRO 35: International RILEM Workshop on InternationalSulfate Attack and Delayed Ettringite Formation. RILEM Publications,2002.
|
[10] | JAWED I, SKALNY J. Alkalies in cement: A review: II. Effects ofalkalies on hydration and performance of Portland cement[J]. CemConcr Res, 1978, 8(1): 37–51.
|
[11] | LEE J, CHU Y, KWON C. The Effects of alkali sulfate on thehydration of a C?A-CaSO??2H?O system[J]. J Korean Ceram Soc,2007, 44(9): 471–476.
|
[12] | MANDER J E, SKALNY J P. Calcium alkali sulfates in clinker[J]. AmCeram Soc Bull, 1977, 56(11): 987–990.
|
[13] | SAMET B, SARKAR S L. The influence of calcium sulfate form onthe initial hydration of clinkers containing different alkalicombinations[J]. Cem Concr Res, 1997, 27(3): 369–380.
|
[14] | DENG L. Effect of protogenetic sulfate on physical and chemicalproperties of cement (in Chinese, dissertation). Chongqing: ChongqingUniversity, 2015.
|
[15] | SHEN Y. Production of sulfate-rich belite sulfoaluminate cement withphosphogysum (in Chinese, dissertation) Chongqing: ChongqingUniversity, 2015.
|
[16] | TENNIS P D, BHATTACHARJA S, KLEMM W A, et al. Assessingthe distribution of sulfate in Portland cement and clinker and itsinfluence on expansion in mortar[J]. Cem Concr Aggreg, 1999, 21(2):212–216.
|
[17] | MILLER F, TANG F. The distribution of sulfur in present-day clinkersof variable sulfur content[J]. Cem Concr Res, 1996, 26(12):1821–1829.
|
[18] | HANIC F, GALIKOVA L, HAVLICA J, et al. Kinetics of the thermaldecomposition of CaSO4 in air[J]. Trans J Br Ceram Soc, 1985, 84(1):22–25.
|
[19] | PLIEGO Y, GLASSER F. Role of sulphates in cement clinkering: thecalcium silicosulphate phase[J]. Cem Concr Res, 1978, 8(4): 455–459.
|
[20] | DREIZLER I E, STRUNGE J, KN FEL D. Effect of alkalies and sulfuron the formation of clinker phases and on the cement properties[C]//Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th InternationalConference on Cement Microscopy, 1985.
|
[21] | MICHAUD V, SUDERMAN R. Anhydrite in high sulfur trioxide(SO3)/alkali clinkers: dissolution kinetics and influence on concretedurability[J]. Cem Concr Aggreg, 1999, 21(2): 196–201.
|
[22] | MICHAUD V, SUDERMAN R W. Sulfates in high SO3/alkali clinker.Their dissolution kinetics and their influence on concrete workabilityand durability[C]//PRO 35: International RILEM Workshop onInternational Sulfate Attack and Delayed Ettringite Formation. RILEMPublications, 2002.
|
[23] | HERFORT D, SOERENSEN J, COULTHARD E. Mineralogy ofsulfate rich clinker and the Potential for internal sulfate attack[J].World Cem, 1997, 28(5): 95–96.
|
[24] | KURDOWSKI W. Role of delayed release of sulphates from clinker inDEF[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2002, 32(3): 401–407.
|
[25] | PAPADAKIS V, TSIMAS S. Supplementary cementing materials inconcrete: Part I: Efficiency and design[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2002,32(10): 1525–1532.
|
[26] | ZHANG Z. Roles of protogenetic anhydrite in portland cement (inChinese, dissertation). Chongqing University, 2012.
|
[27] | TSIMAS S, MOUTSATSOU T A. High-calcium fly ash as the fourthconstituent in concrete: problems, solutions and perspectives[J]. CemConcr Compos, 2005, 27(2): 231–237.
|
[28] | TZOUVALAS G, DERMATAS N, TSIMAS S. Alternative calciumsulfate-bearing materials as cement retarders: Part I. Anhydrite[J]. CemConcr Res, 2004, 34(11): 2113–2118.
|
[29] | TZOUVALAS G, RANTIS G, TSIMAS S. Alternativecalcium-sulfate-bearing materials as cement retarders: Part II. FGDgypsum[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2004, 34(11): 2119–2125.
|
[30] | QIAN J, WEI Y, DENG L, et al. Sulfate types and effects in Portlandcement[J]. J Chin Ceram Soc, 2014, 42(2): 169–178.
|
[31] | GLASSER F. The stability of ettringite [C]//Proceedings of the IntRILEM TC 186-ISA Workshop on Internal Sulfate Attack and DelayedEttringite Formation, 2002.
|
[32] | FU Y, BEAUDOIN J J. Mechanisms of delayed ettringite formation inPortland cement systems[J]. ACI Mater J, 1996, 93(4): 327–333.
|
[33] | FU Y, DING J, BEAUDOIN J. Expansion of Portland cement mortardue to internal sulfate attack[J]. Cem Concr Res, 1997, 27(9):1299–1306.
|
[34] | KELHAM S. Effects of cement parameters on expansion associatedwith DEF[C]//PRO 35: International RILEM Workshop onInternational Sulfate Attack and Delayed Ettringite Formation. RILEMPublications, 2002, 35: 197.
|
[35] | SHIMADA Y, YOUNG J F. Thermal stability of ettringite in alkalinesolutions at 80 ℃[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2004, 34(12): 2261–2268.
|
[36] | KELHAM S. The effect of cement composition and fineness onexpansion associated with delayed ettringite formation[J]. Cem ConcrCompos, 1996, 18(3): 171–179.
|
[37] | TAYLOR H, FAMY C, SCRIVENER K. Delayed ettringiteformation[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2001, 31(5): 683–693.
|
[38] | ESCADEILLAS G, AUBERT J E, SEGERER M, et al. Some factorsaffecting delayed ettringite formation in heat-cured mortars[J]. CemConcr Res, 2007, 37(10): 1445–1452.
|
[39] | MICHAUD V, SUDERMAN R. Sulfate solubility in high SO3clinkers[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on theChemistry of Cement. 1997.
|
[40] | ZHANG Z, OLEK J, DIAMOND S. Studies on delayed ettringiteformation in heat-cured mortars: II. Characteristics of cement that maybe susceptible to DEF[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2002, 32(11): 1737–1742.
|
[41] | AGARWAL S, MASOOD I, MALHOTRA S. Compatibility ofsuperplasticizers with different cements[J]. Const Build Mater, 2000,14(5): 253–259.
|
[42] | CHANDRA S, BJ RNSTR M J. Influence of cement andsuperplasticizers type and dosage on the fluidity of cementmortars—Part I[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2002, 32(10): 1605–1611.
|
[43] | PRINCE W, ESPAGNE M, ARTCIN P C. Ettringite formation: Acrucial step in cement superplasticizer compatibility[J]. Cem ConcrRes, 2003, 33(5): 635–641.
|
[44] | HAN S, PLANK J. Mechanistic study on the effect of sulfate ions onpolycarboxylate superplasticisers in cement[J]. Adv Cem Res, 2013,25(4): 200–207.
|
[45] | FLATT R J, HOUST Y F. A simplified view on chemical effectsperturbing the action of superplasticizers[J]. Cem Concr Res, 2001,31(8): 1169–1176.
|
[46] | JIANG S, KIM B G, ARTCIN P C. Importance of adequate solublealkali content to ensure cement/superplasticizer compatibility[J]. CemConcr Res, 1999, 29(1): 71–78.
|
[47] | HAN S. Mechanism of gypsum and alkali sulfate on the compatibilityof cement with superplasticizers (in Chinese, dissertation). Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2012.
|
[48] | HASKELL W. Three factors govern optimum gypsum content ofcement[J]. Rock Prod, 1959, 62: 108–149.
|
[49] | TAYLOR H. Distribution of sulfate between phases in Portland cement clinkers[J]. Cem Concr Res, 1999, 29(8): 1173–1179.
|
[50] | SAOUT L G, KOCABA V, SCRIVENER K. Application of theRietveld method to the analysis of anhydrous cement[J]. Cem ConcrRes, 2011, 41(2): 133–148.
|
[51] | TAYLOR H. Cement Chemistry[M]. London: Thomas Telford, 1997.
|