OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元

投递稿件

查看量	下载量

相关文章
更多...

农业环境科学学报 2009

建三江地区不同土地利用类型的反硝化潜力

Keywords: 反硝化,建三江,硝酸盐

Full-Text Cite this paper Add to My Lib

Abstract:

建三江地区农业用地的扩张和大量氮素化肥的使用，导致农田外环境中硝酸盐含量的增加，而减少硝酸盐含量的一种重要方式是在农田与接收水体间合适的地方恢复自然湿地，以通过反硝化作用去除径流中的硝酸盐含量。本文应用硝态氮剩余量法，测定建三江地区不同土地利用类型的反硝化潜力。结果表明，湿草甸反硝化潜力最高，其次是水田、旱地、林地及各级渠道，荒草地的反硝化潜力最小。在有机质、总氮、硝酸盐这几个影响因子中，有机质含量对与土壤的反硝化潜力影响较大，在P<0.05下的相关系数为0.80，土壤中添加硝酸盐对土壤的反硝化潜力有一定的促进作用，总N的含量对其有一定影响。从结果中可以看出建三江地区湿草甸是恢复自然湿地较合适的位置。

References

[1]	左玉辉.环境学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2002.34-35.
[2]	USEPA. Report to congress on the National Water Quality Inventory[M]. Washington, DC :US Government Print Office,1996.
[3]	Smith R A, Alexander R B, Wolman M G. Water quality trends in the nation\\'s rivers[J]. Science, 1987, 235 : 1608-1615.
[4]	吴彦东.三江平原湿地的开发对生态环境影响[J].林业科技情报,2006,38(4):6-8.
[5]	张鑫史奕赵天宏等.我国农业非点源污染研究现状及控制措施[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(20):5303-5305.
[6]	Mander U, Mauring T. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Estonia[J]. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35 (5): 323-330.
[7]	Mitsch W J, Day Jr J W. Restoration of the Mississippi-Ohio-Missouri (MOM) River basin: experience and needed research [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2006, 26 : 55-69.
[8]	Comin A F, Romero J A, Asorga V, et al. Nitrogen removal and cycling in restored wetlands used as filters of nutrients for agricultural run-off[J]. Water Science Technology, 1997, 35 : 255-261.
[9]	邹国元张福锁李新慧.夏玉米生长期土壤氮素的硝化-反硝化作用研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2002,20(1):30-34.
[10]	徐玉裕曹文志黄一山等.五川流域农业土壤反硝化作用测定及其调控措施[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(3):1126-1131.
[11]	李先宁吕锡武宋海亮西村修稻森悠平.水耕植物过滤法净水系统底泥硝化反硝化潜力[J].环境科学,2005,26(2):93-97.
[12]	SunZ-G(孙志高) LiuJ-S(刘景双) YangJ-S(杨继松) etal.Nitrification-denitrification and N2O emission of typical Calamagrostis angustifolia wetland soils in Sanjiang Plain[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(1):185-192.
[13]	徐继荣王友绍殷建平王清吉张凤琴何磊孙翠慈.珠江口入海河段DIN形态转化与硝化和反硝化作用[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(5):686-692.
[14]	王东启陈振楼王军许世远杨红霞陈华杨龙远胡玲珍.夏季长江河口潮间带反硝化作用和N2O的排放与吸收[J].地球化学,2006,35(3):271-279.
[15]	Robertson K L Klemedtsson. Assessment of denitrification in organogenic forest soil by regulating factors[J]. Plant and Soil, 1996, 178 : 49- 57.
[16]	Florinsky I V, McMahon S, Burton D L. Topographic control of soil microbial activity : a case study of denitrifiers[J]. Geoderma, 2004, 119 : 33-53.
[17]	White D, Fennessy S. Modeling the suitability of wetland restoration potential at watershed scale[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2005, 24: 359- 377.
[18]	和文祥魏燕燕蔡少华.土壤反硝化酶活性测定方法及影响因素研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2006,34(1):121-124.
[19]	Hunter R G, Faulkner S P. Denitrification potential in restored and natural hardwood wetlands[J]. Soil Science Society of A merica Journal, 2001, 65 : 1865-1872.
[20]	鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M],(第3版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.39-264.
[21]	Groffman P M, Tiedje J M. Denitrification in north temperate forests: spatial and temporal patterns at the landscape and seasonal scales[J].Soil Biology Biochemistry, 1989, 21 : 613-620.
[22]	Mohn J, Schu rmann A, Hagedorn F, et al. Increased rate of denitrification in nitrogen-treated forest soil[J]. Forest Ecology Monagement, 2000, 137: 113-119.
[23]	万晓红周怀东刘玲花.湿地反硝化作用研究进展[J].中国水利,2007(9):38-40.
[24]	Weier K L, Doran J W, Power J F, et al. Denitrifieation and the dinitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon and nitrate[J]. Soil Science Society of A merica Journal, 1993, 57 : 66-72.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133