全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
海洋科学  2012 

藤壶科DNA 分类研究

, PP. 82-88

Keywords: 藤壶科,条形码,DNA,亚科,系统发育

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

围胸总目藤壶科的分类系统经历了二亚科系统(小藤壶亚科Chthamalinae,藤壶亚科Balaninae)、三亚科系统藤壶亚科(Balaninae),巨藤壶亚科(Megabalaninae),凹藤壶亚科(Concavinae),现在采用的是四亚科系统藤壶亚科(Balaniae)、纹藤壶亚科(Amphibalanus)、巨藤壶亚科(Megabalaninae)和凹藤壶亚科(Concavinae),但各亚科之间的系统演化关系尚未进行过分子系统学方面的研究。许多藤壶科物种存在趋同进化的趋势,致使传统的形态分类存在困难,不能正确地进行鉴别。本文测定了藤壶科3个亚科里个代表种的线粒体COI,16S和12S基因的部分序列,结合GenBank中藤壶科其他物种的12S,28S和18S等基因序列,比较了不同基因片段作为鉴别藤壶科物种的条形码的可行性和有效性,并联合16S和12S序列初步分析了藤壶科各亚科之间的一些亲缘关系。研究结果表明:COI基因的种间和种内遗传距离有明显的间隔区,COI最小种间距离为0.122,远大于最大种内距离0.023,而16S基因的种间与种内距离存在覆盖,最小种间距离为0.018,小于最大种内距离0.023,因此表明,线粒体基因COI能更准确地鉴定藤壶科种间以及种内关系,并得出阈值为种内差异小于0.023,种间差异大于0.1。ML和BI系统发育分析结果基本一致,支持4亚科的分类系统;巨藤壶亚科形成明显单系群,支持率很高,而两种纹藤壶和管藤壶聚成一支,形成一个单系,本结果支持Newman&Ross的假说,即纹藤壶属和管藤壶属应合并。

References

[1]  Bucklin A,Wiebe P H,Smolenack S B,DNA barcodes for species identification of euphausiids(Euphausiacea,Crustacea),Plankton Research,2007.
[2]  Elias-Gutierrez M,Jeronimo F M,Ivanova N V,DNA barcodes for Cladocera and Copepoda from Mexico and Guatemala,highlights and new discover-ies,Zootaxa,2008.
[3]  Pitombo F B,Phylogenetic analysis of the Balanidae(Cirripedia,Balanomorpha),Zoologica Scripta,2004.
[4]  Zullo V A,New genera and species of balanoid barna-cles from the Oligocene and Miocene of North Caro-lina,Palaeontology,1984(5).
[5]  Newman W A,Ross A,Revision of the Balanomorph barnacles including a catalogue of the species,San Diego Society of Natural History Memoirs,1976.
[6]  Hebert P D N,Ratnasingham S,de Waard J R,Barcod-ing animal Life:cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 diver-gences among closely related species,Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2003(Suppl 1).
[7]  Bucklin A,Frost B W,Allen L D,Molecular sys-tematic and phylogenetic assessment of 34 calanoid copepod species of the Calanidae and Clausocalani-dae,Marine Biology,2003.
[8]  Costa F O,deWaard J R,Boutillier J,Biological identifications through DNA barcodes:the case of the Crustacea,Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,2007.
[9]  刘瑞玉,任先秋,中国动物志甲壳动物亚门蔓足下纲,北京:科学出版社,1997.
[10]  Meyer C P,Paulay G,DNA Barcoding:error rates based on comprehensivesampling,Plos Biology,2005.
[11]  VanSyoc R J,Fernandes J N,Carrison D A,Mo-lecular phylogenetics and biogeography of Pollicipes(Crustacea:Cirripedia),a Tethyan relict,Elsevier,2010.
[12]  Crandall K A,Fitzpatrick J J R,Crayfish molecular systematics:inferences using a combination of proce-dures to estimate phylogeny,Systematic Biology,1996(1).
[13]  Mokady O Y,Loya Y,Achituv E,Speciation ver-sus phenotipic plasticity in coral inhabiting barnacles:Darwin\'s observation in a phylogenetic context,Molecular Evolution,1999.
[14]  Tamura K,Dudley J,Nei M,MEGA4:Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis(MEGA) software ver-sion 4 0 Molecular Biology and Evolution,2007.
[15]  Posada D,Crandall K A,Modeltest:testing the model of DNA substitution,Bioinformatics,1998.
[16]  Ronquist F,Huelsenbeck J P,MrBAYES 3:Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models,Bioin-formatics,2003.
[17]  Hebert P D N,Ratnasingham S,DeWaard J R,Barcod-ing animal life:Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 diver-gences among closely related species,Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2003.
[18]  Hebert P D N,Cywinska A,Ball S L,Biological identification through DNA barcodes,Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,2003.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133