Santanu R. Optimization of exergy and implications of body sizes of phytoplankton and zooplankton in an aquatic ecosystem model. Ecological Modelling, 2001, 140: 219- 234.
[12]
Andrea B, James H B. Oceanes under the macroscope.Natrure, 2002, 419: 128-129.
[13]
Li W K W. Macroecological pattems of phytoplankton in the northwestem North Atlantic Ocean. Nature, 2002, 419:154- 157.
[14]
Sheldon R W, Parsons T R. A continuous size spectnma for particulate matter in the .sea. J Fish Res Board Can, 1967,24:909-915.
[15]
Sheldon R W, Prakash A, Surcliffe W H Jr. The size distribution of particles in the oceans. Limnol Oceanogr, 1972,17: 327- 340.
[16]
Kerr S R. Theory of size distribution in ecological communities. J Fish Res Board Can, 1974, 31 : 1 859 - 1 862.
[17]
Morel A, Antoine D.Small critters - big effects. Science,2002, 296(5 575) : 1 980- 1 982.
[18]
Montagnes D J S, Beiges J A, Harrison P J, et al. Estimating carbon, nitrogen, protein, and chlorophyll a from volume in marine phytoplankton. Limnol Oceanngr, 1994,39 (5): 1 044-1060.
[19]
Garde K, Cailliau C. The impact of UV - B radiation and different PAR intensities on growth, uptake of 14C, excretion of DOC, cell volume, and pigmentation in the marine prymnesiophyte, Emiliania huxleyi. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 2000, 247: 99- 112.
[20]
Edler L. Recommendations on methods for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea. In : Phytoplarlkton and Chlorophyll.Baltic: Marine Biologists Publication, 1979, 5:38 -48.
Rott E. Sane results from phytoplankton counting intercalibrations. Schweis Hydrol, 1981, 43: 34-62.
[25]
Weibel E R. Stero legical principles for morphometry in electron microscopy, Int Rev Cytol, 1969, 26: 235- 302.
[26]
Billones R G. Image analysis as a tool for measuring particulate matter concentrations and gut content, bodysize, and clearance rates of estrarine copepods : validation and application. Journal of Marine Systems, 1999, 22 : 179 - 194.
[27]
Waite A. New measurements of phytoplankton aggregation in a flocculator using videography and image analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1997, 155:77-88.
[28]
Gilek M, Tackx M L M, Flachier A T, et al. Influence of body size on the uptake, depuration, and bioacctmaulation of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners by Baltic Sea blue mussels, Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology, 1996, 125: 499-510.
[29]
Arakawa H, Yaoit T, Koike T, et al. Size of suspended particles caught by Manila clam, Ruditapes philippinarum.Morinaga 12 Mer, 1997, 35(4) : 149 - 156.
[30]
Paau As, Uro J C J R. Applications of flow cytometry to the study of algal cells and isolated chloroplasts. J Exp Bot,1978, 29:1 011- 1 022.
[31]
Wang X L, Ma Y J, Su Y L. Determining the surface area of marine phytoplankton cells by acid - base titration.Chemosphere, 1997, 35:1 131-1 141.
[32]
Wang X L, Zauke G P. Relationship between growth parameters of the amphipod Gammarus zaddachi (Sexton 1912) and the permeable body surface area determined by the acid - base titration method. Hydrobiolgia, 2002,482 ( Iss 1-3): 179-189.
[33]
Gosselin M, Levasseur M, Wheeler P A, et al. New measurements of phytoplankton and ice algal production in the Arctic Ocean. Deep- Sea Research part Ⅱ , 1997, 44(8)1 623- 1 644.
[34]
Wang H L, Huang B Q, Hong H S. Size - frationated productivity and nutrient dynamics of phytoplankton in subtropical coastal environments. Hydrobiologia, 1997, 352:97- 106.
[35]
Slaalapyonok A, Olson R J, Slaalspyonok L S. Arabian Sea phytoplankton during Southwest and Northeast Monsoons 1995: composition, size structure and biomass from individual cell properties measured by flow cytometry. Deep - Sea Research Ⅱ, 2001, 48:1 231-1 261.
[36]
Lee Chen Y L. Ccraparisons of primary productivity and phytoplankton size structure in the marginal regions of southern East China Sea. Continental Shelf Research, 2000, 20:437 - 458.
[37]
Agawin N S R, Duarte C M, Agusti S. Nutriem and temperature control of picoplankton to phytoplankton biomass and production. Limnol Oceancgr, 2000, 45(3): 591-600.
[38]
Agawin N S R, Duarte C M. Agusti S. Response of Mediterranean Synechococcus growth and loss rates to experimental nutrient inputs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 2000, 20697- 106.
[39]
Hein M, Riemann B. Nutriem limitation of phytoplankton biomass or growth rate : an experimental approach using marine enclosures. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 1995, 188: 167-180.
[40]
Herbert E A, Carol B, Thomas D B. An algal assay method for detemaination of copper complexation capacities of natural waters. Bull Environ Contarn Toxiclo, 1983, 30 : 448 - 455.
[41]
Kaladharan P. Inhibition of primary production as induced by heavy metal ions on phytoplankton population of Cochin.Indian J Fish, 1990, 37(1) : 51 - 54.
[42]
Bolanos L. Differential toxicological response to Cd in An absena strain FCC 7119 growth with NO 3 of NH 4 as nitnzgen source. J Plant Playsiol, 1992, 140(3) : 345 - 349.
[43]
Klotz R L. Algal response to copper under riverine conditions. Environ Pollut Series A, 1981, 24(1) : 1 - 19.
[44]
Copelo S. Effect of lead on the uptake of nutrients by unicellular algae. Water Res, 1993, 27(10) : 1 563 - 1 568.
[45]
Suttle C A, Cochlan W P, Stockner J G. Size - dependent ammonium and phosphate uptake, and N: P supply ratios in an Oligotrophic Lake. Can J Fish Aquat Sci, 1991, 48:1 226- 1 234.
[46]
Sunda W G, Huntsman S A. Interrelated influence of iron,light and cell size on marine phytoplankton growth. Nature (C), 1997, 390(6658) : 389- 392.
[47]
Sunda W G, Huntsman S A. lrcm uptake and growth limitation in oceanic and coastal phytoplankton. Marine Chem, 1995, 50:189-206.
[48]
Wang X L, MaY J, Yu W J, et al. Two- compartment thermodynamic model for bioconcentration of hydrophobic organic chemicals by alga: Quantitative relationship between bioconcentration factor and surface area of marine algae or octanol/water partition coefficiem. Chemosphere, 1997, 35(8): 1781-1797.
[49]
Morelli E, Scarano G. Synthesis and stability of phytochelatins induced by cadmitum and lead in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Marine Environmental Research,2001, 52: 383-395.
