全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2007 

SWAT模型对高精度土壤信息的敏感性研究

Keywords: SWAT,SoLIM,土壤图,敏感性,CN值

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要: 土壤信息是SWAT模型的重要输入数据,通常认为,土壤信息的精度直接影响着模拟结果的准确性。本文以美国Brewery Creek流域(19.5km2)为例,在其他输入不变的情况下,通过比较不同精度土壤数据(美国农业部SSURGO土壤图与SoLIM方法获得的土壤图)的模拟径流,分析SWAT模型对高精度土壤信息的敏感性。应用结果显示,在模型的校正前后,两种土壤数据的径流模拟结果均近似,差别并不显著。这表明在小流域水文模拟中,SWAT模型的径流模拟对高精度土壤信息的敏感性较弱,模拟径流不能很好的体现一定精度基础上土壤信息的差别。本文将此现象主要归因于:SWAT模型所采用的SCS-CN径流计算方法,在计算CN值(Curve Number)时将不同土壤类型综合到四个土壤水文组的做法,概括了土壤信息,模糊了土壤之间的属性差别,损失了土壤精度信息。本研究发现了SCS-CN径流计算方法在利用高精度土壤数据时存在的问题,并进行了分析,为水文模拟中参数的确定和数据的准备提供了参考。

References

[1]  J G Arnold,J R Williams,A D Nicks et al.SWRRB:Abasin scale simulation model for soil and water resourcesmanagement.Texas A&M Univ.Press,College Station,TX,1990.
[2]  R Srinivasan,J G Arnold.Integration of a basin-scale wa-ter quality model with GIS.Water Resources Bulletin,1994,30(3):453~462.
[3]  T Lenhart,K Eckhardt,N Fohrer et al.Comparison of twodifferent approaches of sensitivity analysis.Physics andChemistry of the Earth,2002,27(9-10):645~654.
[4]  A A Romanowicz,M Vanclooster,M Rounsevell et al.Sen-sitivity of the SWAT model to the soil and land use dataparameterisation:a case study in the Thyle catchment,Belgium.Ecological Modelling,2005,187:27~39.
[5]  R S Muttiah,R A Wurbs.Scale-dependent soil and cli-mate variability effects on watershed water balance of theSWAT model.Journal of Hydrology,2002,256(3-4):264~285.
[6]  J M Peschel,K P Haan,R E Lacey.A SSURGO pre-pro-cessing extension for the ArcView Soil and Water Assess-ment Tool.ASAE Meeting Presentation,Paper No.032123,Las Vegas,NV,July 27~30,2003.
[7]  A X Zhu.A similarity model for representing soil spatialinformation.Geoderma,1997,77:217~242.
[8]  詹道江,叶守泽.工程水文学.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2000,163~168.
[9]  Trevor Quinn,A Xing Zhu,James E.Burt.Effects of de-tailed soil spatial information on watershed modelingacross different model scales.International Journal of Ap-plied Earth Observation and Geoinformation,2005,7:324~338.
[10]  J G Arnold,J R Williams,D R Maidment.Continuous-time water and sediment-routing model for large basins.Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,1995,121(2):171~183.
[11]  Texas,Grassland,Soil and Water Research Laboratory,A-gricultural Research Service.EB/OL.2001,http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/swat2000doc.html
[12]  K Eckhardt,N Fohrer,H G Frede.Automatic model cali-bration.Hydrological Processes,2005,19(3):651~658.
[13]  M Govender,C S Everson.Modelling streamflow from twosmall South African experimental catchments using theSWAT model.Hydrological Processes,2005,19(3):683~692.
[14]  张银辉.SWAT模型及其应用研究进展.地理科学进展,2005,24(5):121~130.
[15]  张东,张万昌,朱利等.SWAT分布式流域水文物理模型的改进及应用研究.地理科学,2005,25(4):434~440.
[16]  张东,张万昌.SWAT2000气象模拟器的随机原理、验证及改进.资源科学,2004,26(4):28~36.
[17]  张雪松,郝芳华,程红光等.亚流域划分对分布式水文模型模拟结果的影响.水利学报,2004,(7):119~128.
[18]  郝芳华,陈利群,刘昌明等.降雨的空间不均性对模拟产流量和产沙量不确定的影响.地理科学进展,2003,22(5):446~453.
[19]  A X Zhu,D S Mackay.Effects of spatial detail of soil in-formation on watershed modeling.Journal of Hydrology,2001,248(1-4):54~77.
[20]  A X Zhu,B Hudson,J Burt et al.Soil mapping usingGIS,expert knowledge,and fuzzy logic.Soil Science Soci-ety of America Journal,2001,65(5):1463~1472.
[21]  D J Graczyk,J F Walker,J A Horwatich et al.Effects ofBest-Management Practices in the Black Earth CreekPriority Watershed,Wisconsin,1984-98.Water-ResourcesInvestigations Report 03-4163,2003.
[22]  C L Glocker,R A Patzer.Soil Survey of Dane County:U.S.Dept.of Agriculture,Soil Conservation Service.1978,193.
[23]  M DiLuzio,R Srinivasan,S L Neitsch.SWAT Arcview In-terface User’s Guide For SWAT,98.1∶1998 Beta Release.Blackland Research Center,Texas Agricultural ExperimentStation,Temple,TX,USA,1998.
[24]  J G Arnold,P M Allen.Estimating hydrologic budgets forthree Illinois watersheds.Journal of Hydrology,1996,(176):57~77.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133