全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
科技导报  2015 

美国学术不端行为监管体系的建设及其对中国的启示

, PP. 12-13

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

学者可以定义为一个具有特定专业技能、学识水平、创新思维,并能在相关领域提出引领社会潮流之思想的特殊群体,包括了科学家、社会学家、思想家、哲学家、史学家等等。学者肩负着揭示自然和人类社会发展规律、提供求真辨伪理性科学精神的重大责任,这些特性也决定了学者大多是诚实可信的。学者在开展学术活动过程中的任何不诚实乃至欺骗行为皆被看作是学术不端行为,这样的行为在学者群体内部不可容忍,公众也不会接受,所以学术不端行为一旦出现,必然受到社会的高度关注,也必须受到相应的处罚。

References

[1]  The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Federal policy on research misconduct[J]. Federal Register, 2000, 65 (235).
[2]  Pascal, Chris B. The history and future of the office of research integrity Scientific misconduct and beyond[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1999, 5: 183-198.
[3]  Division of Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services. Responsibility of PHS awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science[Z]. 42 C. F. R. Part 50, 1989.
[4]  National Science Foundation. Misconduct in science and engineering: final rule[J]. Federal Register, 1991, 56: 22286- 22290.
[5]  Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. Responsible science: ensuring the integrity of the research process[M]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
[6]  Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and misconduct in research[R]. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995.
[7]  Fransis, Sybil. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1999, 5: 261- 272.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133