全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
科技导报  2015 

核电厂营运单位应急响应能力评估软件平台

DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.04.017, PP. 97-103

Keywords: 核应急,应急响应能力评估,反应堆监管程序,核电厂

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

核电厂营运单位的应急响应能力是核电厂安全运营的重要保障。在核事故中,核电厂营运单位成功实施应急响应是缓解事故进程、控制事故后果,保护人类健康和环境安全的关键途径。因此,核电厂营运单位应急响应能力建设能否支持其成功应对核事故,已成为业界关注的重点。本文在核电厂营运单位应急响应能力评估方法的基础上,研发了核电厂营运单位应急响应能力评估软件平台,用于辅助核电厂营运单位应急响应能力评估方法的推广应用。结合已经形成的应急响应能力评估准则,分析了应急响应能力评估方法运用中的需求、提出的软件功能共含有7项,包括用户管理、性能指标的计算与数据维护、检查发现的资料管理与评价结果呈现、内部管理流程、综合评价、电厂管理、评估准则和关注点管理,并介绍了功能的软件实现。

References

[1]  Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarter, Government of Japan. Report of the Japanese government to the IAEA ministerial conference on nuclear safety-the accident at TEPCO's fukushima nuclear power stations[R]. Vienna: Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters, Government of Japan, 2011.
[2]  International Atomic Energy Agency Expert Mission. IAEA international fact finding expert mission of the nuclear accident following the great east Japan earthquake and tsunami[EB/OL]. 2011-05-24. http:// www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/meetings/PDFplus/2011/cn200/documentation/ cn200_Final-Fukushima-Mission_Report.pdf.
[3]  薛大知, 张立国. 福岛核事故应急引发的思考[C]. 21世纪初辐射防护论坛第九次会议——日本福岛核事故专题研讨会, 扬州, 09-26-28, 2011. Xue Dazhi, Zhang Liguo. Thinking after Fukushima accident[C]. The 9th Meeting of Radiation Protection Symposium in 21st century, Yangzhou, September 26-28, 2011.
[4]  International Atomic Energy Agency. GS-R-2 Preparedness and Response for a nuclear or radiological emergency[S]. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002.
[5]  International Atomic Energy Agency. Preparation, conduct and evaluation of exercises to test preparedness for a nuclear or radiological emergency[S]. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005.
[6]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. NUREG 0654/FEMAREP-1 Criteria for preparation and evaluation of radiological emergency response plans and preparedness in support of nuclear power plants[S]. Washington DC: Nulcear Regulation Commission, 1980.
[7]  World Association of Nuclear Operators. PRO&C 2013-2 WANO prestartup performance objectives and criteria[R]. London: World Association of Nuclear Opertator, 2013.
[8]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. IMC 0305 Operating reactor assessment program[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2012.
[9]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. IMC 0308 Reactor oversight process (ROP) basis document[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2007.
[10]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Technical basis for performance indicators, IMC 0308 attachment 1[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2007.
[11]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Technical basis for inspection program, IMC 0308 attachment 2[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2006.
[12]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. IMC 0308 attachment 3, significance determination process basis document[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2006
[13]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Technical basis for emergency preparedness significant determination process., IMC 0308 attachment 3 appendix B[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2012.
[14]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. IMC 0608 Performance indicator program[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2012.
[15]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Emergency preparedness significant determination process, IMC 0609 appendix B[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2012.
[16]  US NEI. NEI-99-01 Development of emergency action levels for nonpassive reactors[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Energy Institute, 2012.
[17]  US NEI. NEI 99-02 Regulatory assessment performance indicator guideline[R]. Washington DC: Nuclear Energy Institute, 2009.
[18]  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Reactor oversight process[R]. NUREG 1649, Washington DC: Nuclear Regulation Commission, 2006.
[19]  清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院. 核电厂应急响应能力评估方法研究进展报告. 第I部分: 美国核电厂应急响应能力评估方法研究进展报告[R]. 北京: 清华大学, 2013. Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University. Report of research on evaluation methods for capability of emergency response of NPPs Part I: Evaluation method from nuclear regulation commission,USA[R]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2013.
[20]  国家核安全局. HAF002/01 核电厂营运单位的应急准备和应急响应[S]. 北京: 国家核安全局, 1998. National Nuclear Safety Administration. HAF002/01 Preparedness and response of nuclear power plant[S]. Beijing: National Nuclear Safety Administration, 1998.
[21]  国家核安全局. HAD002/01 核动力厂营运单位的应急准备和应急响应[S]. 北京: 国家核安全局, 2010. National Nuclear Safety Administration. HAD002/01 Preparedness and response of nuclear power plant[S].,Beijing: National Nuclear Safety Administration, 2010.
[22]  国家质量监督检验检疫总局. GB/T 17680 核电厂应急计划与准备准则[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1999. General Administration of Qualify Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, Standardization Administration. GB/T 17680 criteria for emergency planning and preparedness for nuclear power plants[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press 1999.
[23]  中华人民共和国国务院. HAF002 核电厂核事故应急管理条例[S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国国务院, 1993. State Council of China. HAF002 Regulations on emergency management of nuclear power plant[S]. Beijing: State Concil of China, 1993.
[24]  清华大学. 核电厂营运单位应急响应能力评估方法[R]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014. Tsinghua University. Method for evaluation on capability of emergency response of nuclear power plant[R]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014.
[25]  清华大学核研院. 核电厂营运单位应急响应能力评估平台软件设计说明书[R]. 北京: 清华大学, 2014. Tsinghua Universiyt. Design documents of platform for evaluation on capability of emergency response of nuclear power plant[R]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2014.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133