全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
科技导报  2015 

高海拔矿山掘进通风方式优选

DOI: 10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2015.04.009, PP. 56-60

Keywords: 掘进通风,层次分析法,逼近理想解排序法,高海拔矿山

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

为解决高原矿井掘进面通风难题,以西藏自治区某多金属矿为工程背景,依据层次分析法(AHP)与逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS),建立通风评判模型,对3种拟定的混合式掘进通风方式进行优选。根据高原矿井负压低氧的特殊环境,从技术、经济、安全3个方面选取通风系统的评判指标,运用AHP法客观确定各评判指标的权重向量,结合TOPSIS法分析贴近度并计算得出各通风方式的综合优越度。计算结果表明,第2种通风方式(长压短抽)优越度最高。通过AHP-TOPSIS优选的结果科学合理且符合生产实际,可为高原矿井掘进通风方式选择提供理论依据。

References

[1]  谢贤平, 冯长根, 赵梓成. 矿井通风系统模糊优化研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 1999, 24(4): 379-382. Xie Xianping, Feng Changgen, Zhao Zicheng. Research on fuzzy optimization for mine ventilation systems[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 1999, 24(4): 379-382.
[2]  周福宝, 王德明, 李正军. 矿井通风系统优化评判的模糊优选分析法[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2002, 31(3): 262-266. Zhou Fubao, Wang Deming, Li Zhengjun. Fuzzy optimum selection and analysis for optimization and evaluation of mine ventilation systems[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2002, 31(3): 262-266.
[3]  蔡卫. 矿井通风系统安全性评价及其应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2004, 29(2): 195-198. Cai Wei. Safety evaluation and its application on coal mine ventilation system[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2004, 29(2): 195-198.
[4]  程磊, 杨运良, 熊亚选. 基于人工神经网络的矿井通风系统评价研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(5): 88-91. Cheng Lei, Yang Yunliang, Xiong Yaxuan. Study of mine ventilation system assessment based on artificial neural network[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15(5): 88-91.
[5]  Lin Mingyuan, Wang Chencheng, Chen Mingshi, et al. Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process[J]. Computers in Industry, 2008, 59: 17-31.
[6]  陈婷婷, 宋永发. 基于AHP-TOPSIS的地铁车站施工方案比选[J]. 工程管理学报, 2012(4): 33-36. Chen Tingting, Song Yongfa. Construction planning decision of subway stations based on AHP-TOPSIS method[J]. Journal of Engineering Management, 2012(4): 33-36.
[7]  黄贯虹, 方刚. 系统工程方法与应用[M]. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2005: 45-48. Huang Guanhong, Fang Gang. System engineering method and application[M]. Guangzhou: Jinan University Press, 2005: 45-48.
[8]  龚剑, 胡乃联, 张延凯, 等. 基于AHP-FCE法的高海拔地区采矿方法优选[J]. 金属矿山, 2013(9): 1-5. Gong Jian, Hu Nailian, Zhang Yankai, et al. Optimization of mining methods in high-altitude areas based on AHP-FCE[J]. Metal Mine, 2013 (9): 1-5.
[9]  许宝田, 阎长虹, 许宏发, 等. 基于模糊理论的软岩弹性模型识别及参数反分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(11): 2280-2286. Xu Baotian, Yan Changhong, Xu Hongfa, et al. Viscidity-elastic model identification and back analysis of parameters of soft rock on FUZZY theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(11): 2280-2286.
[10]  徐玖平, 吴巍. 多属性决策的理论与方法[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006: 66-73. Xu Jiuping, Wu Wei. Multiple attribute decision making theory and methods[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006: 66-73.
[11]  谢本贤, 陈沅江, 史秀志. 深部岩体工程围岩质量评价的IRMR法研究[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 38(5): 987-992. Xie Benxian, Chen Yuanjiang, Shi Xiuzhi. IRMR method for evaluation of surrounding rock quality in deep rock mass engineering[J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2007, 38(5): 987-992.
[12]  李俊芳, 吴小萍. 基于AHP-FUZZY多层次评判的城市轨道交通线网规划方案综合评价[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2007, 4(2): 205-208. Li Junfang, Wu Xiaoping. Synthetic evaluation for urban rail transit line network planning scheme based on AHP-FUZZY method[J]. Journal of Wuhan Engineering University, 2007, 4(2): 205-208.
[13]  吴立云, 杨玉中, 张强. 矿井通风系统评价的TOPSIS方法[J]. 煤炭学报, 2007, 32(4): 407-410. Wu Liyun, Yang Yuzhong, Zhang Qiang. TOPSIS method for evaluation on mine ventilation system[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2007, 32(4): 407-410.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133