全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于性能的地震工程研究的新进展及对结构非线性分析的要求

, PP. 15-23

Keywords: 基于性能的地震工程,非线性,概率,静力非线性分析,动力非线性分析,增量动力分析,倒塌

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

结合国际地震工程界提出的新一代基于性能的地震工程的框架方法,重点阐述了性能评估中涉及的主要问题.对性能评估使用的静力非线性分析、动力非线性分析方法进行了总结,在此基础上详细阐述了在基于概率的性能评估中有应用前景的增量动力分析方法的概念、相关问题及其应用,并简要介绍了基于增量动力分析思想提出的一些简化方法.最后提出了今后研究的建议,特别是结构非线性分析方面的研究重点.

References

[1]  王亚勇.我国 2000年工程抗震设计模式规范基本问题研究综述[J].建筑结构学报,2000,21(1):2-3.
[2]  谢礼立.关于抗震设计样板规范[J].国际地震动态,2000(7):4-9.
[3]  Park R,Paulay T.Rein forced concrete structures[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons,1975.
[4]  SEAO C.Vision 2000,Conceptual framework for performance-based seismic design[R].Sacramento,1995.
[5]  FEMA.FEMA 273,NEHR Pguidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[R].Washington,D.C.,1997.
[6]  FEMA.FEMA 274,NEHR Pcommentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[R].Washington,D.C.,1997.
[7]  ASCE.FEM A 356,Prestand ard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[R].Washington,D.C.,2000.
[8]  ATC.ATC-40,Seismicevaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings[R].Redwood City,CA,1996.
[9]  Krawink ler H,Miranda E.Performance based earthquake engineering[M]//Earthquake Engineering:From Engineering Seismology to Perfomrance Based Engineering Chapter 9:Boca Raton:CRC Press LLC,2004.
[10]  Wen Y K.Reliability and performance based design[C]//Proc.of the 8th A SCE Specialty Conference on Prob abilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability.Notre Dame:2000.
[11]  Cornell C A,Krawinkler H.Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment[R].PEER Center News,2000,3(2):1-3.
[12]  Cornell C A,Jalayer F,et al.Probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Managemen t Agency steel moment frame guidelines[J].ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering,2002,128(4):526-533.
[13]  Ellingwood B R.Performance based design:structural reliability considerations[C]//Proc.of Structures Congress 2000,Philadelphia,PA:SEI/A SCE,2000.
[14]  Hamburger R O,Foutch D A,Cornell C A.Trans ating research to practice:FEMA/SAC perform an cebased design procedures[J].Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(2):255-267.
[15]  FEMA.FEMA 350,Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings[R].Washington,D.C.,2000.
[16]  Deierlein G G.Overview of acomp rehensive framework for earthquake performance assessment[C]//Proc.of the International Worksho Pon Performance Based Seismic Design Concepts and Implem entation.Bled,Slovenia,2004.
[17]  Moehle J P.and Deierlein,G G.Aframework methodology for perform ancebased earthquake engineering[C]//Proc.of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Vancouver.2004:679.
[18]  ATC.FEMA 440,Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedu res[R].R edw ood C ity,2005.
[19]  ATC.FEMA 445,Next-generation performance based seismic design guidelines program plan for new and existing buildings[R].Redwood City,2006.
[20]  ATC.ATC-58 25% Complete Draft,Guidelines for seismic performance assessment of buildings[S].Redwood City,2005.
[21]  KrawinklerH,Zareian F,et al.Decision support for conceptual perfomrance based design[J].Earthquake Engng Struct.Dyn.,2006,35(1):115-133.
[22]  Vamvatsikos D,Cornell C A.In cremental dynamic analysis[J].Earthquake Engng Struct.Dyn.,2002,31(3):491-514.
[23]  Comartin C D,A schhemi M,et al.A Summary of FEM A 440:miprovement of non linear staticseismic analysis procedures[C]//Proc.of 13th World Con ference on Earthquake Engineering.Vancouver,2004:1476.
[24]  Sasaki K K,Freeman S A,et al.Multmiode pushover procedure(MMP) amethod to identify the effects of higherm odes in a pushover analysis[C]//P roc.of the 6th U.S.N ational Con ference on Earthquake Engineering.Seatt le,1998.
[25]  Chopra A K,Goel R K.A modal pushover analysis procedure forest miating seismic demands for buildings[J].Earthquake Engng Struct.Dyn.,2002,31(3):561-582.
[26]  卢文生,吕西林.模态静力非线性分析中模态选择的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(6):32-38.
[27]  卢文生,吕西林.框架-剪力墙结构模态静力非线性抗震分析方法研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(1):58-66.
[28]  吕西林,朱杰江.高层建筑结构推覆分析及对设计的启示[J].建筑结构学报,2005,26(6):100-107.
[29]  Elnashai A S.Do we really need inelastic dynamic analysis?[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2002,6(S1):123-130.
[30]  Moehle J P.Nonlinear analysis for performance based earthquake engineering[J].Struct.Design Tall Spec.Build,2005,14(5):385-400.
[31]  G B 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
[32]  ASCE 7,Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures[S].R eston,VA:A SCE,2002.
[33]  翟长海,谢礼立.估计和比较地震动潜在破坏势的综合评述[J].地震工程与工程振动,2002,22(5):1-7.
[34]  Aschheim M A,Tjhin T,et al.The scaled nonlinear dynamic procedure:apractical technique for overcoming lmiitations of the nonlinear static procedure[J].ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology,2004,41(1):127-140.
[35]  Mwafy A M,Elnashai A S.Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings[J].Engineering Structures,2001,23(5):407-424.
[36]  Lu co N.Probabilistic seismic demand analysis,SM R Fconnection fractures,and nearsource effects[D].CA.:Stanford Univ.,2001.
[37]  Shome N.Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of non linear structures[D].CA.:Stan ford Univ.,1999.
[38]  Cordova PP,Deierlein G G,et al.Development of at wo parameter seismic in tensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure[C]//Proc.2nd U.S.? Japan Work sho Pon Performance Based Earthquake Engineering for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures.Sapporo,2000:195-214.
[39]  Baker J W,Cornell C A.Choice of a vector of ground motion intensity measures for seismic demand hazard analysis[C]//Proc.of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Vancouver,2004:3384.
[40]  Mehanny S S,Deierlein G G.Modeling and assessment of seismic performance of composite frames withre inforced concrete columns and steel beams[R].Report No.136,The John A.Blume Earthquake Engineering Center,Stanford University,Stanford,2000.
[41]  Krawinkler H,Medina R,et al.Seismic drift and ductility demands and their dependence on groundmotions[J].Engineering Structures,2003,25(5):637-653.
[42]  Krawinkler H.Van Nuys hotel building testbed report:exercising seismic performance assessment[R].PEER Report 2005/11,2005.
[43]  Comerio M C.PEER testbed study on a laboratory building exercising seismic performance assessment[R].PEER Report 2005/12,2005.
[44]  Deierlein G G,Haselton C B.Developing consensus provisions to evaluate collapse of reinforced concrete buildings[C]//Proc.of the First NEES/E-Defense Worksho Pon Collapse Smiulation of Rein forced Concrete Building Structures.Berkeley,2005:3-19.
[45]  Charney F A.Applications in incremental dynamic analysis[C]//Proc.of the 2005 Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic Engineering Symposium.New York,2005.
[46]  Ibarra L F.G lobal collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations[D].CA.:Stan ford Univ.,2003.
[47]  Ibarra L F,Medina Rand Krawinkler H.Hys teretic models that in corporate strength and stiffness deterioration[J].Earthquake Engng Stru c.t D yn.,2005,34(12):1489-1511.
[48]  Vamvatsikos D,Cornell C A.Directestimation of seismic demand and capacity of multi degree of freedom systems through in cremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approxmiation[J].ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering,2005,131(4):589-599.
[49]  Mofid M,Zarfam P,Fard B R.On the modal in cremental dynamic analysis[J].Struct.Design Tall Spec.Build,2005,14(4):315-329.
[50]  Han S W,Chopra A K.Approxmiatein cremental dynamic analysis using the modal pushover analysis procedure[J].Earthquake Engng Struct.Dyn.(in press),2006.
[51]  Dol?ek M,Fajfar P.IN2-Asimple alternative for IDA[C]//Proc.of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Vancouver,2004:3353.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133