全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

动态对比增强磁共振成像对脑胶质瘤微血管通透性评价

, PP. 2397-2399

Keywords: 动态对比增强磁共振成像,胶质瘤,容积转运常数,血管外细胞外间隙

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的探讨动态对比增强磁共振成像对脑胶质瘤微血管通透性的定量评价价值。方法总共38例病理证实胶质瘤患者使用3.0T磁共振仪器进行包括动态对比增强的磁共振检查,获得胶质瘤容积转运常数(Ktrans)和血管外细胞外间隙容积比(Ve)的最大值。不同级别胶质瘤的Ktrans值和Ve值的差异;Ktrans值、Ve值和胶质瘤分级之间的相关性进行统计学分析。结果Ⅱ级胶质瘤Ktrans值(0.028±0.011min-1)与Ve值(0.081±0.044)均低于Ⅲ级(0.105±0.025min-1,0.456±0.079)和Ⅳ级(0.138±0.053min-1,0.512±0.112),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),而Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Ktrans值、Ve值和胶质瘤分级,Ktrans值和Ve值均呈显著正相关(P<0.001)。?结论?动态对比增强磁共振成像可以定量评价脑胶质瘤微血管通透性并可用于胶质瘤术前分级。

References

[1]  陈松,程远,廖鹏,等.S100A9真核表达载体pEGFP-N3-S100A9的构建及其对U251细胞生长的影响[J].第三军医大学学报,2012,34(16):1596.  Chen Song,Cheng Yuan,Liao Peng,et al.Construction of S100A9 eukaryotic expression vector and its effect on proliferation of glioma cell line U251[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2012,34(23):1596. [2]姚一搏,许民辉,徐伦山,等.1H-MRS引导辅助伽玛刀治疗20例脑胶质瘤的初步观察[J].第三军医大学学报,2012,34(18):1881.  Yao Yibo,Xu Minhui,Xu Lunshan,et al.Preliminary observation on the effect of Gamma Knife treatment for 20 glioma patients with 1H-MRS guidance[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2012,34(23):1881. [3]姚声涛,唐文渊,郭川.LRIG1诱导人胶质瘤细胞凋亡与表皮生长因子受体基因关系[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(02):157.  YAO Sheng-tao,TANG Wen-yuan,GUO Chuan.Relationship between LRIG1 induced human glioma apoptosis and EGFR gene[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2008,30(23):157. [4]王跃红,赵文清,李文玲,等.白介素-24抑制胶质瘤细胞生长的体内外实验研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(03):229.  WANG Yue-hong,ZHAO Wen-qing,LI Wen-ling,et al.Interleukin 24 suppresses the growth of malignant glioma cells in vitro and in vivo[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2008,30(23):229. [5]张启川,张冬,廖翠薇,等.弥散加权成像对胶质瘤和脑膜瘤的诊断价值[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(16):1522.  ZHANG Qi-chuan,ZHANG Dong,LIAO Cui-wei,et al.Clinical application of DWI in diagnosis of glioma and meningioma[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2008,30(23):1522. [6]王博,王毅,陈金华,等.大鼠C6脑胶质瘤生长规律的影像学与病理学观察[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(20):1940.  WANG Bo,WANG Yi,CHEN Jin-hua,et al.Growth pattern of rat C6 brain gliomas: imaging and histopathologic observation[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2008,30(23):1940. [7]王舒楠,王毅,李雪,等.大鼠C6脑胶质瘤血管生成的多层螺旋CT灌注成像研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(20):1944.  WANG Shu-nan,WANG Yi,LI Xue,et al.Study on angiogenesis of C6 brain gliomas in rats by MSCT perfusion imaging[J].J Third Mil Med Univ,2008,30(23):1944. [8]冯玉慧,卞修武,郭德玉,等.在人恶性胶质瘤原代培养细胞甲酰化肽受体FPR的表达和功能意义[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(24):2440. [9]程迎新,高原,唐文渊,等.垂体瘤转化基因反义寡核苷酸抑制胶质瘤增殖的实验研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(19):1962. [10]程迎新,唐文渊.恶性胶质瘤患者外周血淋巴细胞基因表达谱的研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2006,28(16):1707.
[2]  卢光明. 动态对比增强MRI的应用与进展[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2015, 49(6): 406-409. [2]Tofts P S, Brix G, Buckley D L, et al. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 1999, 10(3):223-232. [3]Shin J H, Lee H K, Kwun B D, et al. Using relative cerebral blood flow and volume to evaluate the histopathologic grade of cerebral gliomas: preliminary results[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002, 179(3): 783-789. [4]Hakyemez B, Erdogan C, Ercan I, et al. High-grade and low-grade gliomas: differentiation by using perfusion MR imaging[J]. Clin Radiol, 2005, 60(4): 493-502. [5]Provenzale J M, Mukundan S, Dewhirst M. The role of blood-brain barrier permeability in brain tumor imaging and therapeutics[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2005, 185(3): 763-767. [6]Provenzale J M, Mukundan S, Barboriak D P. Diffusion-weighted and perfusion MR imaging for brain tumor characterization and assessment of treatment response[J]. Radiology, 2006, 239(3): 632-649. [7]Veeravagu A, Hou L C, Hsu A R, et al. The temporal correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with tumor angiogenesis in a murine glioblastoma model[J]. Neurol Res, 2008, 30(9): 952-959. [8]贾中正, 张军, 汤伟军, 等. DCE-MRI评估脑胶质瘤微血管通透性[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2013, 19(4): 293-297. [9]Cha S, Yang L, Johnson G, et al. Comparison of microvascular permeability measurements, K(trans), determined with conventional steady-state T1-weighted and first-pass T2*-weighted MR imaging methods in gliomas and meningiomas[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2006, 27(2): 409-417. [10]Falk A, Fahlstrom M, Rostrup E, et al. Discrimination between glioma grades Ⅱ and Ⅲ in suspected low-grade gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging: a histogram analysis approach[J]. Neuroradiology, 2014, 56(12): 1031-1038. [11]Ludemann L, Grieger W, Wurm R, et al. Quantitative measurement of leakage volume and permeability in gliomas, meningiomas and brain metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2005, 23(8): 833-841. [12]Choi H S, Kim A H, Ahn S S, et al. Glioma grading capability: comparisons among parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ADC value on DWI[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2013, 14(3): 487-492.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133