全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

多方交际中的联盟与礼貌行为研究

DOI: 10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.03.016, PP. 318-323

Keywords: 多方交际,礼貌,关系联盟,效用联盟,矛盾联盟

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

与两方交际相比,多方交际的一个重要特征是交际者之间可以形成联盟关系。语料分析表明,在单话轮的微观交际层面,多方交际的群体中可以形成三种联盟:关系联盟、效用联盟和矛盾联盟。关系联盟是天然的荣辱与共的面子共同体,对一位联盟成员面子的维护或威胁往往同时也影响另一位成员;效用联盟的成员出于分享效用的目的组建联盟,面子的收益(和损失)在联盟成员之间可以实现再分配;而矛盾联盟的成员之间呈效用负相关的关系,成员的面子相互抵触,对一位成员面子的维护同时就是对另一位成员面子的威胁,反之亦然。

References

[1]  Hymes D H. Foundations of Sociolinguistics[M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1974.
[2]  Goffman E. Forms of Talk[M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1981.
[3]  Levinson S C. Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffmans Concepts of Participation[C]∥Drew P, Wootton A. Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988:161227.
[4]  Dynel M. Setting Our House in Order: The Workings of Impoliteness in Multi-party Film Discourse[J]. Journal of Politeness Research, 2012,8:161194.
[5]  Wilmot W W. Dyadic Communication: A Transactional Perspective[M]. Reading: Addison-Wisley Publishing Company, 1975.
[6]  Lerner G. Selecting Next Speaker: The Context-sensitive Operation of a Context-free Organization[J]. Language in Society, 2003,32:177201.
[7]  Clark H, Carlson T B. Hearers and Speech Acts[J]. Language, 1982,58(2),332373.
[8]  Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. Introducing Polylogue[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2004,36(1):124.
[9]  Caplow T. Two Against One: Coalition in Triads[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
[10]  Bruxelles S, Kerbrat-Orecchioni C. Coalitions in Polylogues[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2004,36(1):75113.
[11]  Websters New Encyclopedic Dictionary[Z]. Darien: Federal Street Press, 2002.
[12]  Ellis D G. Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process[M]. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1994.
[13]  Hirokawa R Y, Cathcart R S, Henman L D. Small Group Communication: Theory and Practice: An Anthology[M]. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press Inc., 2010.
[14]  Shenoy P. On Coalition Formation: A Game Theoretic Approach[J]. International Journal of Game Theory, 1979, 8: 133–164.
[15]  Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life[M]. Garden City: Doubleday, 1959.
[16]  Kangasharju H. Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2002,34(10/11):14471471.
[17]  Traverso V. Interlocutive “Crowding” and “Splitting” in Polylogues: The Case of a Researchers Meeting[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2004,36(1):5374.
[18]  Laforest M. Complaining in Front of a Witness: Aspects of Blaming Others for Their Behaviour in Multi-party Family Interactions[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2009,41(12):24522464.
[19]  Heinemann T. Participation and Exclusion in Third Party Complaints[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2009,41(12):24352451.
[20]  Nguyen H.Boundary and Alignment in Multiparty Conflict Talk[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011,43(6):17551771.
[21]  Perelmutter R. Klassikazhanra: The flamewar as a Genre in the Russian Blogosphere[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2013,45(1):7489.
[22]  赵永青. 基于语料库的英语多人冲突性话语研究[D]. 上海:上海外国语大学研究生部, 2012.
[23]  陈婧,邹德艳,黄滔. 多人会话中的结盟现象研究综述[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2014(2):4953.
[24]  曹雪芹,高鹗. 红楼梦[M]. 红研所,校注. 2版. 北京:人民文学出版社, 2005.
[25]  Grosjean M, Traverso V. Les Cadres Participatifsdans Les Polylogues[C]∥Cabasino F. Du Dialogue au Polylogue.Rome: CISU, 1998:5166.
[26]  Leech G N. Principles of Pragmatics[M]. London: Longman, 1983.
[27]  Gu Yueguo. Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1990,22(2):237257.(责任编辑:李新根)

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133