全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

现有等效线性化分析程序在实际软场地计算结果方面的比较

DOI: 10.13577/j.jnd.2015.0407, PP. 56-62

Keywords: 土层地震反应分析,软土场地,KiK-net,LSSRLI-1,SHAKE2000,强震记录

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

SHAKE2000和LSSRLI-1分别是目前国外和国内广泛使用的两种一维等效线性化土层地震反应分析程序,分析二者之间的异同性及其与实测记录的差异程度,可为改进土层地震反应分析方法提供基础。收集整理了日本KiK-net台网中17个软场地(Ⅲ、Ⅳ类场地)39次地震的基岩及地表地震动记录,其中基岩加速度峰值在6~214Gal之间,土层非线性取3种情况,采用SHAKE2000和LSSRLI-1两种程序分别进行了土层地震反应计算,从地表峰值加速度、加速度反应谱、加速度反应谱谱值比以及土层最大剪应变4个方面进行了对比计算。研究表明:当土体非线性不强时,SHAKE2000和LSSRLI-1计算出的PGA结果差异多数可忽略,计算出的土体剪应变最大值误差也多数小于20%:当土体非线性较强时,仅有少数差异可忽略,计算出土体剪应变最大值误差则多数大于20%:SHAKE2000的结果和LSSRLI-1与实测峰值加速度和反应谱多数情况下差异较大,土体弱非线性下LSSRLI-1结果稍好于SHAKE2000的结果,土体非线性较强时SHAKE2000的结果要好一些。

References

[1]  Idriss I M, Seed H B. Seismic response of horizontal soil layers[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(4):1003-1031.
[2]  Martin P P, Seed H B. One-dimensional dynamic ground response analyses[J], Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1982, 108(7):935-952.
[3]  李小军. 一维土层地震反应线性化计算程序// 地震小区化 (理论与实践). 北京:地震出版社, 1989: 250-265.(in Chinese) LI Xiaojun. The soil seismic response of one-dimensional linear calculation program// Seismic Microzonation (Theory and Practice). Beijing: Seismological Press, 1989. 250-265.
[4]  齐文浩, 薄景山. 土层地震反应等效线性化方法综述[J]. 世界地震工程, 2007, 23(4):221-226. QI Wenhao, BO Jingshan. Summarization on equivalent linear method of seismic responses for soil layers[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 23(4):221-226.(in Chinese)
[5]  胡聿贤. 地震安全性评价技术教程[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 1999. HU Lvxian. Tutorial of Seismic Safety Evaluation[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1999.(in Chinese)
[6]  GB 17741-2005 工程场地地震安全性评价技术规范[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2005. GB 17741-2005 Code for Seismic Safety Evaluation of Engineering Sites[S]. Beijing: Chinese Standard Press,2005.(in Chinese)
[7]  Idriss I M,Sun J I.A computer program for the ID analysis of gevtectvnical engineering problencs[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,2000.
[8]  齐文浩, 薄景山, 刘德东, 等. 强震记录对三个土层地震反应分析程序的检验[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2005, 25(5):30-33. QI Wenhao, BO Jingshan, LIU Dedong, et al. A test for three programs of soil layer seismic response analysis by strong earthquake record[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2005, 25(5):30-33.(in Chinese)
[9]  GB 50011-2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社. GB 50011-2010 Code for Seismic Design of Building[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press,2010.(in Chinese)
[10]  孙锐, 陈红娟, 袁晓铭. 土的非线性动剪切模量比和阻尼比不确定性分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(8):1228-1235. SUN Rui, CHEN Hongjuan, YUAN Xiaoming. Uncertainty of non-linear dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of soil[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(8):1228-1235.(in Chinese)
[11]  GB/T 17742-2008 中国地震烈度表[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2008. GB/T 17742-2008 Chinese seismic intensity scale[S]. Beijing: Chinese Standard Press,2008.(in Chinese)
[12]  Annie O L, Kwok, Jonathan P. Stewart, Youssef M A. Hashash. Nonlinear ground-response analysis of turkey flat shallow stiff-soil site to strong ground motion[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2008, 98(1):331-343.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133