Totland O. Environment dependent pollen limitation and selection on floral traits in an alpine species. Ecology, 2001, 82(8): 2233-2244.
[4]
Harder L D, Barrett S C H. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature, 1995, 373: 512-515.
[5]
Tomimatsu H, Ohara M. Evolution of Hierarchical floral resource allocation associated with mating system in an animal-pollinated hermaphroditic herb, Trillium camschatcense (Trilliaceae). American Journal of Botany, 2006, 93: 134-141.
[6]
Ogden J. The reproductive strategy of higher plantsⅡ. The reproductive strategy of Tussilago farfara. Journal of Ecology, 1974, 62: 319-324.
[7]
Silvertown J W, Lovett D J. Introduction to Plant Population Biology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993. 141-157.
[8]
Cheplick G P. Life history trade-offs in Amphibromus scabrivalvis (Poaceae): Allocation to clonal growth, storage, and cleistogamous reproduction. American Journal of Botany, 1995, 82: 621-629.
Worley A C, Barrett S C H. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): Direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number. Evolution, 2000, 54: 1533-1545.
[19]
Caruso C M. The quantitative genetics of floral trait variation in Lobelia: Potential constraints on adaptive evolution. Evolution, 2004, 58: 732-740.
Worley A C, Barrett S C H. Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): Genetic correlations between flower size and number. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2001, 14: 469-481.
[25]
Worley A C, Baker A M, Thompson J D, et al. Floral display in Narcissus: Variation in flower size and number at the species, population, and individual levels. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2000, 161: 69-79.
[26]
Sato H, Yahara T. Trade-offs between flower number and investment to a flower in selfing and outcrossing varieties of Impatiens hypophylla (Balsalminaceae). American Journal of Botany, 1999, 86: 1699-1707.