全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
草业学报  2015 

葡萄渣对羔羊生产性能、屠宰性能和养分消化代谢的影响

DOI: 10.11686/cyxb20150413, PP. 114-120

Keywords: 葡萄渣,杂交羔羊,生产性能,屠宰性能,缩合单宁,养分消化代谢

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本试验采用单因子完全随机试验设计,选择60只3月龄左右杜寒F1代公羔进行试验,测定不同水平葡萄渣对羔羊生产性能、屠宰性能和养分消化代谢的影响。本试验设4个饲粮处理组,每个处理15个重复,每个重复一只羊,Ⅰ为基础饲粮,Ⅱ、Ⅲ和Ⅳ处理组为饲粮中分别含有8%,16%和24%的葡萄渣,缩合单宁(condensedtannins,CT)含量分别为0,1.5,3.0和4.5g/kg。结果表明,Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ组羔羊日采食量、日增重、胴体重、屠宰率和胴体脂肪含量都显著高于Ⅰ组(P<0.05),N表观存留率极显著高于Ⅰ组(P<0.01),但Ⅰ组羔羊的酸性洗涤纤维和N表观消化率显著高于Ⅳ组(P<0.05);Ⅱ组羔羊的饲料转化率显著高于Ⅰ组(P<0.05),净肉率极显著高于Ⅰ组(P<0.01)。随着CT含量的增加,羔羊的N、中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维表观消化率逐渐降低,N的表观存留率逐渐升高,综合考虑羔羊日增重、饲料转化率、屠宰性能和养分利用率等指标,饲粮中葡萄渣以8%~16%为宜。

References

[1]  He Y F. Grape comprehensive processing. Food Engineering, 2008, (3): 32-34.
[2]  Wang B, Liu W Z. Strategic adjustment in the development of wine making industry in Xinjiang and policy proposals. China Brewing, 2006, (4): 78-79.
[3]  Qing J H, Zhao Y L, Kong X H. The Research safety of grape pomace feed. Journal of Zhangjiakou Agricultural College, 1996, (3): 18-19.
[4]  Li Y, Su T T, Wang Z Y. The Study of synthetic utilization on byproduct of grape machining. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22(4): 106-107.
[5]  Torres J L, Varela B, Garcia M T, et al. Valorization of grape by products. Antioxidant and biological properties of polyphenolic fractions differing in procyanidin composition and flavonol content. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry,2002, 50(26): 7548-7555.
[6]  Spangheroa M, Salem A Z M, Robinsond P H. Chemical composition including secondary metabolites and rumen fermentability of seeds and pulp of Californian and Italian grape pomaces. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2009, (152): 245-252.
[7]  Wang Y S, Wang X J, Li F D, et al. Effects of grape pomace on artificial rumen fermentation. China Herbivore Science, 2013, 33(4): 11-16.
[8]  Zhang P, Sun Z P, Zhang X S, et al. Effect of grape seed powder replacing for corn on the weight and economic benefit of adult ewes. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2013,40(4): 245-247.
[9]  Zhao Y Z. Sheep production. Sheep Slaughtering. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[10]  Provenza F D. Post-ingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. Journal of Range Management, 1995, 48: 2-17.
[11]  Barry T N, Duncan S J. The role of condensed tannin in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep. Voluntary intake. British Journal of Nutrition, 1984, 51: 485-491.
[12]  Butler L G. New Perspectives on the Anti-nutritional Effects of Tannins. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2000: 177-179.
[13]  Dhanda J. Evaluation of Crossbred Goat and Sheep Production in the Typics. London, UK: Long man Group Ltd, 2001: 56-59.
[14]  Yan Q L, Jin H G, Zhao Y H, et al. Effect of different hybridized combination fattening lambs on growth and slaughter performance and meat quality traits. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2010, 35(6): 43-45.
[15]  Zhuang T, Gu H R, Zhao G Q, et al. Effect of different forage combinations on Boer×Xuhuai goat growth and slaughter performance. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 48(15): 41-43.
[16]  Zhao Y G, Hong Q H, Xie P, et al. Effects of diet nutritional on slaughter performances and meat quality of Yunnan semi-wool sheep. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 277-286.
[17]  Santos-Silva J, Mendes I A, Bessa R J B. The effect of genotype, feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs I. growth, carcass composition and meat quality. Livestock Production Science, 2002, 76(1): 17-25.
[18]  Pan F M, Li F D, Hao Z L, et al. Effects of Tannin content in residue of tea-leaves on digestion and utilization of nutrients and metabolic parameters of nitrogen in sheep. Acta Veterinaria Et Zootechnica Sinica, 2012, 43(1): 71-81.
[19]  Zhang X Q, Li Y. Effects of Tannin content in Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) hay on digestibility of nutrients and utilization of nitrogen in sheep diets. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2009, 40(3): 356-362.
[20]  Martinez R L V, Silvae O, Neto S G, et al. Bromatological composition, intake and in vivo digestibility of the diets with different levels of “catingueira” hay fed to Morada Nova sheep. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2001, 30(2): 553-562.
[21]  赵有璋. 羊生产学. 肉羊的屠宰. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[22]  Li Z F, Gao T Y, Zhou C S. Nutritional mechanism of tannin on nutrients utilization in ruminants. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2007, (6): 97-103.
[23]  Xu Z C, Tian Y J. The effects of Robinia pseudoacacia leaves tannins on goat digestive rate. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 1995, (1): 30-31.
[24]  Hao Z L, Liu S M, Meng X Z. Ruminant animal nutrition. The Measurement Index of the Protein Requirement and the Nutritional Value. Lanzhou: Gansu Nation Publishing, 2000:148-150.
[25]  Shi B, Di Y. Plant polyphenol. The Significance and Development Trend in Research of Plant Polyphenols. Beijing: Science Press, 2000: 25-28.
[26]  Zhou M. Effects of Tannin on ruminant nutrient metabolism. China Feed, 1996, (11): 23-24.
[27]  Li L, Hou X Z. Recent advances of cellulolytic bacteria. Journal of Yellow Cattle Science, 2002,(2): 24-28.
[28]  Zhang S R, Yi X W, He X, et al. Effects of feed intake behavior, milk performance and serum free amino acid for the South dairy cows owing to the different total mixed feeding ration. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(3): 23-30.
[29]  Jung H G, Mertens D R, Payne A J. Correlation of acid detergent lignin and Klason lignin with digestibility of forage dry matter and neutral detergent fiber. Journal of Dairy Science, 1997, 80(8): 1622-1628.
[30]  Zhang P H, Wang J Q, He J H, et al. Effect of ensiling on content and rumen degradability of forage rice straw’s DM and NDF. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(6): 81-84.
[31]  Kumar R, Vaithiya A N. Nutritional significance and effect on animal productivity of tannins in treaves. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1990, 30: 21-38.
[32]  何于飞. 葡萄综合加工. 食品工程, 2008, 3: 32-34.
[33]  王彬, 刘维忠. 新疆葡萄酒产业发展战略调整与对策研究. 中国酿造, 2006, (4) : 78-79.
[34]  秦建华, 赵月兰, 孔祥浩. 葡萄渣饲料安全性的研究. 张家口农专学报, 1996, (3): 18-19.
[35]  李莹, 苏婷婷, 王战勇. 葡萄加工副产品的综合利用研究. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(4): 106-107.
[36]  王银山, 汪晓娟, 李发弟, 等. 葡萄渣对人工瘤胃发酵的影响. 中国草食动物科学, 2013,33(4): 11-16.
[37]  张鹏, 孙占鹏, 张雪山, 等. 葡萄籽粉替代玉米对成年母羊体重和经济效益的影响.中国畜牧兽医, 2013,40(4): 245-247.
[38]  闫秋良, 金海国, 赵云辉, 等. 不同精粗比全混合日粮对育肥羔羊屠宰性能及肉品质的影响. 云南农业大学学报, 2010, 35(6): 43-45.
[39]  庄涛, 顾洪如, 赵国琦, 等. 不同粗饲料组合对波尔×徐淮山羊生长和屠宰性能的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2012, 48(15): 41-43.
[40]  赵彦光, 洪琼花, 谢萍, 等. 精料营养对云南半细毛羊屠宰性能及肉品质的影响. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 277-286. 浏览
[41]  潘发明, 李发弟, 郝正里, 等. 茶渣单宁含量对绵羊养分消化利用与氮代谢参数的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2012, 43(1): 71-81.
[42]  张晓庆, 李勇. 红豆草单宁含量对绵羊养分消化率及氮利用的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2009, 40(3): 356-362.
[43]  黎智峰, 高腾云, 周传社. 单宁对反刍动物养分利用的营养机制. 家畜生态学报, 2007,(6): 97-103.
[44]  徐载春, 田育军. 刺槐叶粉中单宁对山羊消化率的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 1995,(1): 30-31.
[45]  郝正里, 刘世明, 孟宪政. 反刍动物营养学. 衡量蛋白质需要量与营养价值的指标. 兰州: 甘肃民族出版社, 2000:148-150.
[46]  石碧, 狄莹. 植物多酚. 植物多酚研究与利用的意义及发展趋势. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000: 25-28.
[47]  周明. 单宁对动物营养代谢的影响. 中国饲料, 1996,(11): 23-24.
[48]  李莉, 侯先忠. 瘤胃纤维分解菌的研究进展. 黄牛杂志, 2002,(2): 24-28.
[49]  张石蕊, 易学武, 贺喜, 等. 不同精粗比全混合日粮饲养技术对南方奶牛采食行为、产奶性能和血清游离氨基酸的影响. 草业学报, 2008, 17(3): 23-30.
[50]  张佩华, 王加启, 贺建华, 等. 青贮对饲料稻秸秆DM和NDF瘤胃降解特性的影响. 草业科学, 2008, 25(6): 81-84.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133