全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
兵工学报  2015 

维修-更换串联系统贮存可用度建模及费用分析

DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.03.025, PP. 552-558

Keywords: 系统工程方法论,贮存可用度,费用分析,可修系统,定期检测,定期更换

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

?针对长期贮存产品的维修保障特点,分别建立两类典型贮存部件的瞬时贮存可用度模型。一类部件为等时定检维修产品,定期检测有一定的概率无法探测到故障,若检测发现故障则立即进行维修,经过一段时间后修复如新;另一类部件为定期更换产品,其更换周期长度为维修类产品定检周期的整数倍。在此基础上,推导由这两类部件串联构成系统的瞬时和平均贮存可用度,并建立该系统贮存剖面内的维护费用模型。以固定贮存期内的费用率最低为目标,对检测周期以及更换周期进行了综合优化。计算结果表明:不同的周期长度配比对于费用率有较大的影响,合理的周期规划是实现贮存经济性的关键。

References

[1]  [1] 罗巍, 张春华, 谭源源, 等. 基于Bootstrap的可修系统贮存可用度近似置信下限评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2010, 31(3):391-395.
[2]  [2] 罗巍, 张春华, 谭源源, 等. 系统贮存可靠度近似置信下限的Boots trap评估方法[J] . 宇航学报, 2009, 30(4): 1725-1730.
[3]  [3] Ito K, Nakagawa T, Nishi K. Extended optimal inspection policies for a system in storage[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 1995, 22(10):83-87.
[4]  [4] Ito K, Nakagawa T. Optimal inspection policies for a storage system with degradation at periodic tests[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2000, 31(10):191-195.
[5]  [5] Scarf P A, Cavalcante C A V. Hybrid block replacement and inspection policies for a multi-component system with heterogeneous component lives[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 206(2):384-394.
[6]  [6] Cavalcante C A V, Scarf P A, De Almeida A T. A study of a two-phase inspection policy for a preparedness system with a defective state and heterogeneous lifetime[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96(6):627-635.
[7]  [7] Laggounea R,Chateauneuf A,Aissani D. Preventive maintenance scheduling for a multi-component system with non-negligible replacement time[J]. International Journal of Systems Science, 2010, 41(7):747-761.
[8]  [8] Liu X, Li J, Al-Khalifa K N, et al. Condition-based maintenance for continuously monitored degrading systems with multiple failure modes[J]. IIE Transactions, 2013, 45(4):422-435.
[9]  [9] Castanier B, Grall A, Bérenguer C. A condition-based maintenance policy with non-periodic inspections for a two-unit series system[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005, 87(1):109-120.
[10]  [10] Golmakani H R. Condition-based inspection scheme for condition-based maintenance[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2012, 50(14):3920-3935.
[11]  [11] Tian Z, Liao H. Condition based maintenance optimization for multi-component systems using proportional hazards model[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2011, 96(5):581-589.
[12]  [12] Laggoune R, Chateauneuf A, Aissani D. Impact of few failure data on the opportunistic replacement policy for multi-component systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95(2): 108-119.
[13]  [13] Taghipour S, Banjevic D. Optimum inspection interval for a system under periodic and opportunistic inspections[J]. IIE Transactions, 2012, 44(11):932-948.
[14]  [14] Taghipour S, Banjevic D. Optimal inspection of a complex system subject to periodic and opportunistic inspections and preventive replacements[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 220(3):649-660.
[15]  [15] Nakagawa T,Mizutani S,Chen M. A summary of periodic and random inspection policies[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2010, 95(8):906-911.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133