全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

国内外不良反应因果判断原则及评价方法解读

Keywords: 不良反应,个例评价,因果判断原则,因果评价方法

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

不良反应因果关系判断是药物警戒研究的通用程序,目前尚无统一的判断标准与分类标准。时间性、一致性、特异性、反应程度是不良反应因果判断应遵循的基本原则。不良反应因果关系评价方法众多,大致可分为标准化算法、专家判断法、贝叶斯法。部分评价方法分类标准之间定义模糊不清、病例资料的不完整、评价者临床应用时的不同理解均是造成评价结果不同的重要原因。几乎每一种方法均对不良反应因果关系进行分级,主要为5级分类,但评级方法间的基本原理、评价标准、特异度与敏感度有所差异。每一种方法均有其优缺点,尚无一项标准化的方法适用于所有的不良反应评价。

References

[1]  魏水易,剻丽萍,顾文华. 贝叶斯法与可疑药物不良反应因果评价[J]. 药物不良反应杂志,2002(2):102.
[2]  Liu B A,Knowles S R,Mittmann N,et al. Reporting of fatal adverse drug reactions[J]. Can J Clin Pharmacol,2001,8:84.
[3]  Kelly W N. The quality of published adverse drug event reports:review[J]. Ann Pharmacother,2003,37:1774.
[4]  Kramer M S,Leventhal J M,Hutchinson T A,et al. An algorithm for the operational assessment of adverse drug reactions:I. Background,description,and instructions for use[J]. JAMA,1979,242:623.
[5]  Dangoumau J,Evreux J C,Jouglard J. Method for determination of undesirable effects of drugs[J]. Therapie,1978,33:373.
[6]  许卫华,温泽淮,赖世隆. 2种药物不良反应因果关系判断方法的比较与分析[J].中药新药与临床药理,2000,11(4):248.
[7]  Naranjo C A,Busto U,Sellers E M,et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther,1981,30:239.
[8]  Kane-Gill S L,Kirisci L,Pathak D S. Are the Naranjo criteria reliable and valid for determination of adverse drug reactions in the intensive care unit?[J]. Ann Pharmacother,2005,39:1823.
[9]  Hoskins R E,Mannino S. Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions using decision support and informatics tools[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,1992,1:235.
[10]  魏戌,谢雁鸣,王永炎.皮试试验与中药注射剂上市后临床安全性再评价[J].中国中药杂志,2011,36(20):2877.
[11]  Emanueli A,Sacchetti G. An algorithm for the classification of untoward events in large scale clinical trials[J]. Agents Actions Suppl,1980,7:318.
[12]  Venulet J,Ciucci A,Berneker G C. Standardised assessment of drug-adverse reaction associations:rationale and experience[J]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol,1980,18:381.
[13]  Jones J K. Adverse drug reactions in the community health setting:approaches to recognizing,counseling,and reporting[J]. Fam Community Health,1982,5:58.
[14]  Wiholm B E. The Swedish drug-event assessment methods: special workshop-regulatory[J]. Drug Inf J,1984,18:267.
[15]  刘建平,邢建民.循证的药品不良反应评价方法[J].中国药物警戒,2010,7(1):12.
[16]  管玫,钟光德,黄文志.药品不良反应病例报告评价标准的探讨[J].中国药房,2008,19(26):2054.
[17]  Karch F E,Lasagna L. Toward the operational identification of adverse drug reactions[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther,1977,21:247.
[18]  Naranjo C A,Busto U,Sellers E M,et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther,30(2):239.
[19]  Benichou C,Danan G,Flahault A. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs:II.An original model for validation of drug causality assessment methods:case reports with positive rechallenge[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,1993,46:1331.
[20]  Hoskins R E,Mannino S. Causality assessment of adverse drug reactions using decision support and informatics tools[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf,1992,1:235.
[21]  Arimone Y,Begaud B,Miremont-Salame G,et al. A new method for assessing drug causation provided agreement with experts\' judgment[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2006,59:308.
[22]  World Health Organization(WHO),Uppsala Monitoring Centre. The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardised case causality assessment. WHO.. http://www.who-umc.org/graphics/26649.pdf.
[23]  杜文民,王永铭,程能能.药品不良反应的判定及其研究方法 [J].药物警戒,2005,2(1):11.
[24]  王家良. 临床流行病学——临床科研设计、测量与评价[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,2009:458.
[25]  Lane D A. The Bayesian approach to causality assessment:an introduction[J]. Drug Infor J,1986,20:455.
[26]  Mashford M L. The Australian method of drug-event assessment. Special Workshop-regulatory[J]. Drug Inf J,1984,18:271.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133