全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

风险资本与智力资本协同条件分析与效应检验

, PP. 24-31

Keywords: 风险资本,智力资本,协同系统,门槛效应

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

?运用协同学的原理与方法对风险资本和智力资本的协同条件及变化进行了定性分析,并对二者的协同效应进行了基于风险投资持股比例的门槛效应检验。结果显示:(1)协同效应下智力资本对企业绩效显著地存在“单门槛效应”,风险投资持股比例可以作为判断风险资本与智力资本发生协同作用的条件;(2)当风险投资持股比例高于门槛值时,智力资本会加速提升企业的资产利用效率和市场价值,但这一现象在企业人力资本增值效率方面的表现并不理想。研究结论表明智力资本的增值作用仍有提升空间,但协同效应的发挥需要满足一定的条件,客观上要求创业企业要有针对性的引进风险投资,以便改革、增强并利用智力资本。

References

[1]  Stewart T A. Brainpower: How intellectual capital is becoming America's most valuable asset [J]. Fortune,1991,6(3):44-60.
[2]  Brav A,Gompers P A. Myth or reality? The long-run underperformance of initial public cfferings: evidence from venture and nonventure capital-backed companies[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(5):1791-1821.
[3]  唐运舒,谈毅.风险投资、IPO时机与经营绩效——来自香港创业板的经验证据[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(7):17-26.
[4]  da Silva Rosa R, Velayuthen G, Walter T. The sharemarket performance of Australian venture capital-backed and non-venture capital-backed IPOs[J]. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2003, 11(2):197-218.
[5]  Florin J. Is venture capital worth it? Effects on firm performance and founder returns[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20(1):113-135.
[6]  Bornemann M. Potential of value systems according to the VAIC method[J]. International of Journal of Technology Management, 1999, 18(5):463-475.
[7]  Chen M C, Cheng S J, Hwang Y. An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms' market value and financial performance[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2005, 6(2):159-176.
[8]  Tan H P, Plowman D, Hancock P. Intellectual capital and financial returns of companies[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2007, 8(1):76-94.
[9]  曾蔚.基于联合风险投资的创业智力资本对企业价值创造的作用机理研究.长沙:中南大学,2011.
[10]  Sveiby K E. The new organizational wealth: managing and measuring knowledge-based assets[M]. San Fancisco:Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 1997.
[11]  Bontis N. Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: framing and advancing the state of the field[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 1999, 18(5):433-462.
[12]  Pulic A. VAIC-an accounting tool for IC management[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2000, 20(5):702-714.
[13]  陈晓红,李喜华,曹裕. 智力资本对企业绩效的影响:基于面板数据模型的分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010,30(7):1176-1184.
[14]  曹裕,陈晓红,李喜华.企业不同生命周期阶段智力资本价值贡献分析[J].管理科学学报,2010,13(5):21-32.
[15]  Gan K, Saleh Z. Intellectual capital and corporate performance of technology-intensive companies: Malaysia evidence[J]. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 2008, 1(1):113-130.
[16]  赫尔曼·哈肯,凌复华译.协同学—大自然构成的奥秘[M].上海:上海世纪出版集团,2001.
[17]  Hansen B E. Sample splitting and threshold estimation[J]. Econometrica, 2000,68(3): 575-603.
[18]  Riahi-Belkaoui A. Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: a study of the resource-based and stakeholder views[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2003,4(2):215-226.
[19]  Kaplan S N, Stromberg P. Venture capitalists as principals: contracting, screening and monitoring. Working Paper,National Bureau of Economic Research, 2001.
[20]  Kross W, Ro B, Schroeder D. Earnings expectations: The analysts' information advantage[J]. Accounting Review,1990,65(2):461-476.
[21]  Watts R L, Zimmerman J L. Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective [J]. Accounting Review, 1990,65 (1):131-156.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133