全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

碳排放交易对实现我国“十二五”减排目标的成本节约效应研究

, PP. 37-46

Keywords: 省际碳交易市场模型,边际减排成本,成本节约效应,气候变化,可计算一般均衡模型

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

?本文针对实现我国"十二五"期间减排目标的现实背景,构建了一个省际排放权交易模型,重点探讨了在实现各省减排目标的过程中,碳排放权交易机制发挥的成本节约效应。研究设置了无碳交易市场(NETS)、仅包含北京等六个碳交易试点省市的碳交易市场(PETS)和全国范围内实施碳排放权交易(CETS)三种政策情景。通过模型分析得到以下结论:(1)为实现"十二五"碳强度减排目标,扣除自然下降率,全国二氧化碳排放需要减少约6.39亿吨,占当年总碳排放的6.65%;无碳排放交易时全国需要付出约157.62亿元的减排成本,占当年GDP的0.04%;六省市参与碳交易情景下,全国总的减排成本约为150.66亿元,节约减排成本4.42%,碳交易量为0.22亿吨CO2,占总减排量的3.39%,均衡碳价约为70.55元/吨CO2;全国碳市场情景下,全国总的减排成本约为120.68亿元,相比于无碳排放交易情景节约减排成本23.44%,碳交易量为1.21亿吨CO2,占总减排量的18.98%,均衡碳价约为38.17元/吨CO2;(2)碳交易市场对参与交易的省份的成本节约效应各不相同,总的来看,东、西部地区成本节约较为明显,部分西部地区能够在完成自身减排目标前提下,通过加入碳交易市场而获取正的收益。

References

[1]  Grubb M. The economics of the Kyoto protocol [J]. World Economics,2003,4(3):143-189.
[2]  范英, 张晓兵, 朱磊.基于多目标规划的中国二氧化碳减排的宏观经济成本估计[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2010, 6(2):130-135.
[3]  Coase R H. The problem of social cost [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, (3): 1-44.
[4]  Dales J H. Pollution, property and prices [M]. Toronto: University Press, 1968.
[5]  Montgomery W D. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1972, 5(3): 395-418.
[6]  Tietenberg T H. Emissions trading: an exercise in reforming pollution policy [M]. Washington: Resources for the Future, 1985.
[7]  Rose A. Equity considerations of tradable carbon emission entitlements [M]//Barrett s,et al. Combating global warming. New York: United Nations, 1992.
[8]  Sterner T. The selection and design of policy instruments in environmental and natural resource management [M].Washington,RFF Press, 2002.
[9]  Rose A, Peterson T D, Zhang Zhongxiang. Regional carbon dioxide permit trading in the United States: coalition choices for Pennsylvania [J]. Penn State Environ Law Review, 2006, 14: 101-127.
[10]  Massetti E, Tavoni M. A developing Asia emission trading scheme (Asia ETS) [J]. Energy Economics, 2012,34(S3):S436-S443.
[11]  郑爽. 全球碳市场动态[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2006,2(6):281-285.
[12]  周宏春. 世界碳交易市场的发展与启示术[J]. 中国软科学,2009,(12):39-48.
[13]  王灿,傅平,陈吉宁. 清洁发展机制对温室气体减排的贡献 [J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版),2008,48(3):357-361.
[14]  Kesicki F, Strachan N. Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice [J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2011, (14): 1195-1204.
[15]  Ellerman D A, Decaux A. Analysis of post-kyoto CO2 emission trading vsing marginal abatement curves[R]. Report 40, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.
[16]  Chen Wenying. The costs of mitigating carbon emissions in China: findings from China MARKAL-MACRO Modeling [J]. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(7): 885-896.
[17]  Manne A S, Richels R G. Buying greenhouse insurance: the economic costs of CO2 emission limits [M]. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1992.
[18]  Enkvist P A, Nauclér T, Rosander J. A cost curve for greenhouse gas reduction [J]. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2007, (1): 35-45.
[19]  Baker E, Clarke L, Shittu E. Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(6): 2799-2816.
[20]  International Energy Agency. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion: highlights[M]. Paris: OECD/IEA, 2011.
[21]  Nordhaus W D. The cost of slowing climate change: a survey [J]. Energy Journal, 1991, (12): 37-65.
[22]  Bohm P, Larsen, B. Fairness in a tradable permit treaty for carbon emissions reductions in Europe and the former Soviet Union [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1994, (4): 219-239.
[23]  Okada A. International negotiations on climate change: a non-cooperative game analysis of the kyoto protocol [M]//Avenhaus R,Zartman I W. Diplomacy games-formal models and international negotiation. Berlin: Springer Publisher, 2007.
[24]  李陶, 陈林菊, 范英.基于非线性规划的我国省区碳强度减排配额研究[J]. 管理评论, 2010, 21(6): 54-60.
[25]  IPCC. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[R]. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Program, 2006.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133