OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元
|
|
|
基于风险偏好下的网上在线拍卖策略设计
, PP. 96-102
Keywords: 占线拍卖,竞争性能比,风险,回报
Abstract:
?针对占线拍卖问题(on-lineauctionproblem)的卖方策略进行了研究,扩展了传统占线拍卖机制中拍卖人风险规避态度的假设,构建了基于风险偏好的风险回报分析框架。进一步,为拍卖人设计了RPS拍卖策略和MPS拍卖策略,结论显示这两种拍卖策略使得拍卖人可以根据自己的风险偏好和对未来的预期进行拍卖数量、拍卖价格的选择,而且两种拍卖策略的竞争性能比优于传统竞争分析框架下的结果。数值算例的分析表明,在风险回报分析框架下,拍卖人的风险忍耐度与拍卖策略的收益成正比。分析还显示,设置多个预期参考价格可以增强拍卖人预测能力,从而提高拍卖策略收益。
References
[1] | Babaioff M, Immorlica N, Kempe D, et al. Online auctions and generalized secretary problem[J]. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 2008, 7(2):1-11.
|
[2] | Bhattacharya S. Imperfect information, dividend policy, and the bird in the hand fallacy[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10(1):259-270.
|
[3] | Easterbrook F H. Two agency-cost explanations of dividends[J]. American Economic Review, 1984, 74(4):650-659.
|
[4] | Al-Binali S. A risk-reward framework for the competitive analysis of financial games[J]. Algorithmica, 1999, 25: 99-115.
|
[5] | 丁黎黎, 徐寅峰, 董玉成. 基于风险补偿的拍卖策略[J].系统工程, 2006, 24(7):116-119.
|
[6] | Jensen M C.Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeover[J].American Economic Review, 1986, 76(2):323-329.
|
[7] | Gopal R D, Thompson S, Whinston A B. Managing risks in multiple online auctions: an options approach[J]. Decision Sciences, 2005, 36(3): 397-425.
|
[8] | Miller M, Kevin R. Dividend policy under asymmetric information[J]. Journal of Finance, 1985, 40(4), 1031-1051.
|
[9] | Mathews T, Katzman B, The role of varying risk attitudes in an auction with a buyout option[J]. Economic Theory, 2006, 27(3):597-613.
|
[10] | 谢文容, 陈宏民.网络拍卖和固定价格交易卖家收益的比较分析[J].软科学, 2012, 26(9):50-55.
|
[11] | 杨忠直, 彭俊伟. 基于财富效用的产权拍卖定价的计算模拟[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(2):299-305.
|
[12] | 饶从军, 赵勇, 王清. 基于可变供给量的可分离物品拍卖及其应用[J].中国管理科学, 2012, 20(1): 129-138.
|
Full-Text
|
|
Contact Us
service@oalib.com QQ:3279437679 
WhatsApp +8615387084133
|
|