全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于直觉模糊层次分析的创业投资引导基金绩效评价方法研究

, PP. 124-131

Keywords: 创业投资引导基金,绩效评价,直觉模糊信息,直觉模糊层次分析法

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

?针对我国创业投资引导基金的特点,本文首先从政策效应、经济效应以及管理效应三个维度构建了创业投资引导基金的绩效评价指标体系。其次,考虑到直觉模糊层次分析法自身的优点,尤其在刻画不确定评价信息方面的优越性,本文提出基于直觉模糊层次分析法的绩效评价方法。最后,根据对成都市某创业投资引导基金实际运作数据的收集和整理,并对其绩效进行评价,表明了本文提出的方法在创业投资引导基金绩效评价方面具有良好的适用性。而且通过对该方法与传统模糊层次分析法的比较,发现该方法在评价精度方面具有更加优异的表现。

References

[1]  Audretsch D B, Thurik A R. What's new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies [J]. Industrial and corporate change, 2001, 10(1): 267-315.
[2]  Bartzokas A, Mani S. Financial systems, corporate investment in innovation, and venture capital [M]. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004.
[3]  Cumming D J.Agency costs, institutions, learning, and taxation in venture capital contracting [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20(5): 573-622.
[4]  Cumming D. Government policy towards entrepreneurial finance: Innovation investment funds [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2007, 22(2): 193-235.
[5]  Sheffield A. Overview of publicly-backed venture capital and loan funds in the UK . Working Paper,Capital for Enterprise, 2012.
[6]  李洪江, 鲍晓燕. 国外创业投资引导基金绩效的实证考察[J]. 软科学, 2012, 26(4): 58-62.
[7]  张勇. 创业投资引导基金运行机制研究. 天津:南开大学, 2012.
[8]  苏辛, 周勇. 条件自回归 expectile 模型及其在基金业绩评价中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(6): 22-29. 浏览
[9]  朱杰, 陈浪南. 基于状态空间模型的动态基金业绩评价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(6): 11-21. 浏览
[10]  周莉, 盛梦婷. 创业板中创业投资基金的投资效益分析[J]. 中央财经大学学报, 2012, (1): 34-35.
[11]  Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978, 6(2): 429-444.
[12]  杜娟, 霍佳震. 基于数据包络分析的中国城市创新能力评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 85-93. 浏览
[13]  薛晖, 郑中华, 谢启伟. 基于多种 DEA 模型和 Gini 准则的效率评价方法——兼对我国高校运营绩效的评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(6): 98-104.
[14]  Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1993, 24(6): 417-441.
[15]  Deng Julong. The control problems of grey systems [J]. Systems & Control Letters, 1982, 1(5): 288-294.
[16]  Saaty T L. A scaling method for priorities in a hierarchical structures [J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1977, 6(15): 234-281.
[17]  Van Laarhoven P L M, Pedrycz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11(1): 229-241.
[18]  Buckley J J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis [J]. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1985, 3(17): 233-247.
[19]  Xu Zeshui. Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making [J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(11): 2363-2379.
[20]  Xia Meimei, Xu Zeshui, Liao Huchang. Preference relations based on intuitionistic multiplicative information [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2013, 3(20): 113-133.
[21]  Zadeh L A. Fuzzy sets [J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3): 338-356.
[22]  Xu Zeshui, Liao Huchang. Intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2014, 22(4): 749-761.
[23]  Atanassov K. Intuitionistic fuzzy set [J]. Fuzzy Sets and System, 1986, 20(1): 87-96.
[24]  Szmidt E, Kacprzyk J. Amount of information and its reliability in the ranking of Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy alternatives [M]//Rakus-Adersson E, Yager R R,Ichalkaranjie N,et al. Recent adoances in decision making. Berlin: Springer, 2009:7-19.
[25]  Xu Zeshui. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators [J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, 15(6): 1179-1187.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133