论图书馆评价的主体
Keywords: 图书馆评价,评价主体,评价标准,评价工具,图书馆管理
Abstract:
根据图书馆评价的性质和目的差异，将图书馆评价的主体分为政府机构、图书馆行业协（学）会、各类图书馆、用户和第三方机构等五种类型，并分析各评价主体的定位、特点及相关评价实践。调查总结国内外广受认可的图书馆评价标准、有影响力的图书馆评价项目及其采用的评价工具及方法。第三方机构的评价具有职业化优势，且不易受到各种主观因素的限制，应当予以加强。表6。参考文献31。
| [1] | President Requests $265,556,000 for IMLS 2010
|
| [2] | 查看详情 2010
|
| [3] | LC Strategic Plan Fiscal Years 2008-2013:18 2010
|
| [4] | Annual Report of the Librarian of Congress 2007:9 2010
|
| [5] | Telematics for Libraries 2010
|
| [6] | Department for culture,media and sport Taking part survey 2010
|
| [7] | NCES library statistics 2010
|
| [8] | Schamber L,Relevance and information behavior,Medford,NJ:Learned Information Inc,1994.
|
| [9] | Japanese National statistics-Cultural Facilities and Cultural Properties 2010
|
| [10] | 文化部图书馆评估标准细则 2010
|
| [11] | LAC evaluation plan 2008-2009:5 2010
|
| [12] | 段海艳.论公共图书馆绩效评价的主体、内容与方法[J].图书馆学研究,2008(10)
|
| [13] | Library Dynamics current service 2010
|
| [14] | J1SC e-Assessment 2010
|
| [15] | Measuring the Economic Impact of the British Library 2010
|
| [16] | LISU 2010
|
| [17] | Pew Internet 2010
|
| [18] | NISO Standards 2010
|
| [19] | ISO TC46/SC8 2010
|
| [20] | PITTCat+ 2010
|
Full-Text
