全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

互联网时代的智识自由与社会责任之争——美国公共图书馆互联网过滤相关法案与判例研究

Keywords: 图书馆,互联网服务,过滤软件,智识自由,美国

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文以美国为背景,分别从相关政策法规和法院判例两个方面对图书馆提供的互联网服务所引发的社会矛盾进行研究。研究发现,在过滤软件的使用问题上,联邦政府与图书馆协会的立场迥异。联邦政府要求图书馆使用过滤软件,而图书馆协会则持异议。对比和研究法院判例发现,争议主要聚焦于两个方面:过滤软件是否会过滤掉有用信息,对于儿童是智识自由重要还是保护儿童更重要。通过研究美国图书馆互联网服务引发的争议,可以揭示互联网环境下智识自由与社会责任之间关系的复杂性,对我国图书馆界在相关问题的处理上有借鉴意义。表1。参考文献32。

References

[1]  国际图联/联合国教科文组织.公共图书馆服务发展指南[M].林祖澡,译.上海:上海科学技术文献出版社, 2002:44-45.(FILA/UNESCO.The public library service:IFLA/UNESCO guidelines for development[M].Lin Zuzao, Trans.Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 2002:44-45.)
[2]  U.S.Senate.Constitution of the United States [EB/OL].[2013-08-20].http://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm#amdt_1_(1791).
[3]  ALA.Statement on library use of filtering software [EB/OL].[2013-07-21].http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/statementspols/statementlibrary.
[4]  U.S.Congress.Communications Decency Act [EB/OL].[2013-07-21].http://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/cda/cda-final.html.
[5]  U.S.Congress.Children\'s online privacy protection act of 1998[EB/OL].[2013-07-20].http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm.
[6]  U.S.Congress.Children\'s internet protection act[EB/OL].[2013-07-11].http://www.fcc.gov/guides/childrens-internet-protection-act.
[7]  U.S.Supreme Court.Supreme Court Decision in Reno v.ACLU, Et Al[EB/OL].[2014-02-21].https://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/supreme-court-decision-reno-v-aclu-et-al.
[8]  门文.互联网络与言论自由——美国关于《传播净化法案》之争[J].国际新闻界, 1997(4):42-43.(Men Wen.The Internet and freedom of speech—Debate on Communications Decency Act, U.S.[J].Journal of International Communication, 1997(4):42-43.)
[9]  The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.United States Et Al.v.American Library Association, Inc., Et Al.[EB/OL].[2014-02-18].http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=02-361.
[10]  ALA.Statement on library use of filtering software[EB/OL].[2013-08-15].http://www.ala.org/Template.cfm?Section=IF_Resolutions&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=13090.
[11]  Harnisch A M.Internet filtering in public libraries[EB/OL].[2013-07-22].http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/fallsem98/harnischfilter.pdf.
[12]  ALA.Resolution on the use of filtering software in libraries[EB/OL].[2013-08-02].http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/statementspols/ifresolutions/resolutionuse.
[13]  ALA.Resolution on opposition to federally mandated Internet filtering[EB/OL].[2013-07-17].http://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/statementspols/ifresolutions/resolutionopposition.
[14]  Sasso R.ACLU sues library for blocking Wiccan websites[EB/OL].[2013-08-03].http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/202073-aclu-sues-library-for-blocking-wiccan-websites.
[15]  NYLA.Intellectual freedom manual[EB/OL].[2013-07-28].http://ifman.pbworks.com/f/ifm.pdf.
[16]  Symons A K.Open letter from the ALA president[EB/OL].[2013-08-26].http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=8527d058-71d5-44af-9f1f-466e593220e4%40sessionmgr12&vid=1&hid=23&bdata=Jmxhbmc9emgtY24mc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZl#db=aph&AN=1409089.
[17]  eNotes.Internet filters in schools and libraries[EB/OL].[2013-07-18].http://www.enotes.com/internet-reference/internet-filters-schools-and-libraries.
[18]  Judge dismisses livermore library filtering suit[EB/OL].[2013-08-27].http://www.techlawjournal.com/censor/19990115.htm.
[19]  U.S.Supreme Court.Legal-Cases-Adamson v.Minneapolis Public Library[EB/OL].[2013-07-12].http://davidburt.us/policy-research/legal/adamson/.
[20]  United States District Court Eastern District of Washington.Sarah Bradburn, Pearl Cherrington, Charles Heinlen and the Second Amendment Foundation v.North Central Regional Library District[EB/OL].[2013-07-28].https://aclu-wa.org/sites/default/files/attachments/Bradburn%20v.%20NCRLD%20complaint.pdf.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133