时间延迟对故事情境关联虚假记忆的影响

摘要： 研究以故事情境短文为实验材料，探讨了即时与延时48h后虚假记忆变化表现及其与真实记忆相分离的认知神经机制。结果表明，虚假记忆在延迟48h后诱发的LPC走向比即时更正性；即时条件虚假记忆与真实记忆认知加工相分离表现在有意回想加工及额叶后提取加工阶段，延迟48h后仅表现在额叶后提取加工阶段。上述结果为虚假记忆存在随时间变化及其与真实记忆相分离提供了电生理证据。
Abstract: Abstract Bartlett (1932) using qualitative research methods have demonstrated that memory is a process of construction, and the content of the memory become more reasonable with time. His research is considered to be the beginning of the false memory. DRM paradigm (Deese,1959; Roediger&McDermott,1995) ,a qualitantive research methods, is a classic research paradigm which is widely uesd to induce false memories under laboratory condition. Nonetheless,most of these behavioral memory studies are limited in making such distinctions the component memory processes driving interval-associated memory failures and successes. For example, McDermott (1996) reporter 48h interval between study and test procduced probabilities of false memory that exceeded those of true memory. Alternative neural and cognitive mechanisms may underlie this performance, which could be indexed with functional techniques. The current study investigated the cognitive and neural electrophysiological processes underlying the retrieval phase after imme- diately and 48h delay by means of ERP techniques to further explored the electrophysiological processes of the retention interval effect on false memory. The experiment was conducted with 20 healthy right-handed undergraduates as the subjects and five story contexts as the material during study phase. There were three types of target words during the test phase including higher associated words, critical words and lower associated words. The higher associated words were choose form story contexts; Critical words were new and highly associated with the story contexts, in addition lower associated words were lowly associated with the contexts. The participants studied 5 blocks (one story context in each block and 60 associated target words in each list) and did an old/new recognition test both after short and long delay. Recognition judgment was divided into high confidence level judgment and low confidence level judgment. The results of high confidence level judgment was adopted for statistical analysis. Before long delay test, participants must recall the story context as much as possible for 120s according to story cue. Four subjects were rejected because of the lack of the number of artifact-free trials. The instrument for the statistical analysis used in the experiment is SPSS18.0. The results showed that (1) There was no significant