全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
科学通报  2012 

海南万宁辉长岩体及辉绿岩脉侵位机制的磁组构证据

, PP. 2086-2093

Keywords: 磁组构,侵位机制,基性岩体,基性岩脉,海南

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

海南岛万宁地区的辉长岩体及穿插其中的辉绿岩脉均为印支期近时基性侵入体.我们对辉长岩和辉绿岩脉进行了磁组构研究.万宁辉长岩体获得61个定向岩芯样品,边杜村辉长岩获得7个定向岩芯样品.横跨7条辉绿岩脉共系统钻取53个定向岩芯样品.岩石磁学分析表明,辉绿岩和辉长岩主要的磁性矿物分别是多畴贫钛磁铁矿和假单畴-多畴贫钛磁铁矿,它们为基性岩中的原生磁性矿物.辉长岩和辉绿岩均具有较低的磁各向异性度(PjK1,磁线理方向)分布相对集中,平均方向为1.9°∠15.7°,绝大多数样品倾角小于30°,显示低倾角正北方向倾伏;7条辉绿岩脉各自的K1主轴集中,且一致性良好,分布在NNW-SSE方向,倾角大致在30°左右.K1分布表明万宁辉长岩体的侵位方式为以低仰角由北向南侧向侵位,而辉绿岩脉则以中至低仰角从NNW向SSE侧向侵位.它们可能是位于更北部的同源岩浆脉动式侵位的结果,这意味着在万宁北部的印支期花岗岩之下可能隐伏有该期的基性岩体.

References

[1]  2 Zhu R X, Shi C D. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of Hannuoba basalt, northern China: Constraints on the vent position of the lava sequences. Geophys Res Lett, 2003, 30: 1066??
[2]  5 Knight M D, Walker G P L. Magma flow direction in dykes of Koolau Complex, Oahu, determined from magnetic fabric studies. J Geo- phys Res, 1988, B5: 4301-4319
[3]  6 Tauxe L, Gee J S, Staudigel H. Flow direction in dikes from anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility data: the bootstrap way. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103: 17775-17790??
[4]  7 Raposo M I B, D’Agrella-Filho M S. Magnetic fabrics of dike swarms from SE Bahia State, Brazil: Their significance and implications for Mesoproterozoic basic magmatism in the S?o Francisco Craton. Precambrian Res, 2000, 99: 309-325??
[5]  8 Callot J P, Guichet X. Rock texture and magnetic lineation in dykes: A simple analytical model. Tectonophys, 2003, 366: 207-222??
[6]  9 Hrouda F, Faryad S W, Jerábek P, et al. Primary magnetic fabric in an ultramafic body (Moldanubian Zone, European Variscides) survives exhumation-related granulite-amphibolite facies metamorphism. Lithos, 2009, 111: 95-111??
[7]  10 Ca?òn-Tapia E, Herrero-Bervera E. Sampling strategies and the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of dykes. Tectonophys, 2009, 466: 3-17??
[8]  11 Bolle O, Besse M, Diot H. Magma flow and feeder chamber location inferred from magnetic fabrics in jotunitic dykes (Rogaland anorthosite province, SW Norway). Tectonophys, 2010, 493: 42-57??
[9]  12 纪新林, 王磊, 潘永信. 北京房山岩体的磁组构特征及其对岩体侵位的约束. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53: 1671-1680
[10]  13 谢晋强, 张国伟, 鲁如魁, 等. 西秦岭温泉岩体的磁组构特征及其侵位机制意义. 地球物理学报, 2010, 53: 1187-1195
[11]  15 Rochette P, Aubourg C, Perrin M. Is this magnetic fabric normal? A review and case studies in volcanic formations. Tectonophys, 1999, 307: 219-234??
[12]  17 Ca?ón-Tapia E. Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of lava flows and dykes: A historical account. Geol Soc Spec Pub, 2004, 238: 205-225??
[13]  18 Curtis M L, Riley T R, Owens W H, et al. The form, distribution and anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of Jurassic dykes in H.U. Sverdrupfjella, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica: Implications for dyke swarm emplacement. J Struct Geol, 2008, 30: 1429-1447??
[14]  20 李传新, 郭召杰, 孟自芳, 等. 天山北缘新近系沉积物岩石磁学研究. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 2006, 36: 988-997
[15]  22 Krása D, Herrero-Bervera E. Alteration induced changes of magnetic fabric as exemplified by dykes of the Koolau volcanic range. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2005, 240: 445-453??
[16]  24 胡守云, 王苏民, Appel E, 等. 呼伦湖湖泊沉积物磁化率变化的环境磁学机制. 中国科学D辑: 地球科学, 1998, 28: 334-339
[17]  27 敖红, 邓成龙. 磁性矿物的磁学鉴别方法回顾. 地球物理学进展, 2007, 22: 432-442
[18]  28 Henry B. The magnetic fabric of the Egletons granite (France): Separation and structural implication. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 1988, 51: 253-263??
[19]  29 Hrouda F. Magnetic anisotropy of rocks and its application in geology and geophysics. Surv Geophys, 1982, 5: 37-82??
[20]  32 Almeida F F M, Carneiro C D R, Machado J D L, et al. Magmatismo Pós-Paleozóico no Nordeste oriental do Brasil. Rev Brasil Geoc, 1988, 18: 451-462
[21]  1 周伟新, 万天丰. 崔召花岗岩岩体的磁组构特征及其构造侵位意义. 岩石学报, 1999, 15: 83-88
[22]  3 Khan M A. The anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of some igneous and metamorphic rocks. J Geophys Res, 1962, 67: 2867-2875
[23]  4 Ellwood B B. Flow and emplacement direction determined for selected basaltic bodies using magnetic susceptibility anisotropy measurements. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 1978, 41: 254-264??
[24]  14 Rochette P, Jackson M, Aubourg C. Rock magnetism and the interpretation of anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility. Rev Geophys, 1992, 30: 209-226??
[25]  16 Ernst R E, Baragar W R. Evidence from magnetic fabric for the flow pattern of magma in the Mackenzie giant radiating dyke swarm. Nature, 1992, 356: 511-513??
[26]  19 唐立梅, 陈汉林, 董传万, 等. 海南岛三叠纪中基性岩的年代学、地球化学及其地质意义. 地质科学, 2010, 45: 1139-1155
[27]  21 Zhu R, Lin M, Pan Y. History of the temperature-dependence of susceptibility and its implications: Preliminary results along an E-W transect of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Chin Sci Bull, 1999, 44(Suppl 1): 81-86??
[28]  23 刘庆生, 刘振东, 刘青松, 等. 一个变泥质岩包体样品的系统热磁试验及其矿物学意义. 地球物理学报, 2005, 48: 876-881
[29]  25 Deng C L, Zhu R X, Verosub K L, et al. Mineral magnetic properties of loess/paleosol couplets of the central Loess Plateau of China over the last 1.2 Myr. J Geophys Res, 2004, 109: B01103
[30]  26 Hrouda F, Müller P, Hanák J. Repeated progressive heating in susceptibility vs. temperature investigation: A new palaeotemperature indicator. Phys Chem Earth, 2003, 28: 653-657??
[31]  30 Raposo M I B, Gastal M C P. Emplacement mechanism of the main granite pluton of the Lavras do Sul intrusive complex, South Brazil, determined by magnetic anisotropies. Tectonophys, 2009, 466: 18-31??
[32]  31 Ernst R E. Magma flow directions in two mafic Proterozoic dyke swarms of the Canadian shield, as estimated using anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility data. In: Parker A J, Rickwood P C, Tucker D H, eds. Mafic Dykes and Emplacement Mechanisms. Balkema: Rotterdam, 1990. 231-235

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133