Kim Y, Engel B A, Lim K J, et al. Runoff impacts of land-use change in Indian River Lagoon watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2002, 7(3): 245-251.
USEPA. National water quality inventory, report to congress executive summary.Washington DC:USEPA ,1995.
[4]
Arnold C L, Gibbons C J. Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(2): 243-258.
[5]
Xian G, Homer C, Updating the 2001 National Land Cover Database Impervious Surface Products to 2006 using Landsat Imagery Change Detection Methods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(8): 1676-1686.
[6]
Becker A, Braun P. Disaggregation, aggregation and spatial scaling in hydrological modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 1999, 217(3-4): 239-252.
[7]
UNESCO. Hydrological effects of urbanization. Studies and Reports in Hydrology 18, Paris, France, 1974 .
Kauffman G J, Belden A C, Vonck K J, et al. Link between impervious cover and base flow in the White Clay Creek Wild and Sceinc Watershed in Delaware. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 324-335.
[10]
Shuster W D, Bonta J, Thurston H, et al. Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. UrbanWater Journal, 2005, 2(4): 263-275.
[11]
Carter R W. Magnitude and frequency of floods in suburban areas.U.S. Geological Survey Paper 424-B, B9-B11, Washington, DC: U.S.Geological Survey, 1961.
[12]
Weng Q. Modeling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS. Environmental management, 2001, 28(6): 737-748.
Beihley R E, Kargar M, He Y. Effects of impervious area estimation methods on simulated peak discharge. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 388-398.
[15]
Bhaduri B. A Geographic Information System-based Model of the Long-Term Impact of Land Use Change on Non-point Source Pollution at Watershed Scale [D]. Purdue University, 1998.
[16]
Jennings D B, Jarnagin S T. Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: A historical perspective in a mid-Atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17(5): 471-489.
Sprague L A, Harned D A, Hall D W, et al. Response of stream chemistry during base flow to gradients of urbanization in selected locations across the conterminous United States, 2002-04: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5083, 2007:133.
[20]
Sprague L A, Zuellig R E, Dupree J A. Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in the South Platte River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming, chap. A of Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in six metropolitan areas of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-A, 2006: 139.
[21]
Gregory M B, Calhoun D L. Physical, chemical, and biological responses of streams to increasing watershed urbanization in the Piedmont Ecoregion of Georgia and Alabama, Chapter B of Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in six metropolitan areas of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-B, 2007, 104 p., available online only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5101B;
[22]
Moring J B. Effects of urbanization on the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of small Blackland Prairie streams in and near the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-C, 2009: 31.
[23]
Waite I R, Steven S, Carpenter K D, et al. Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in the Willamette River basin and surrounding area, Oregon and Washington: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-D, 2008: 62.
[24]
Ahearn D S, Sheibley R W, Dahlgren R A, et al. Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last freeflowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada, California. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 313(3-4): 234-247.
Yin Z, Walcott S, Kaplan B, et al. An analysis of the relationship between spatial patterns of water quality and urban development in Shanghai, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2005, 29(2):197-221.
Endreny T A, Thomas K E. Improving estimates of simulated runoff quality and quantity using road-enhanced land cover data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 346-351.
[32]
Bhaduri B, Harbor J, Engel B, et al. Assessing watershed-scale, long-term hydrologic impacts of land-use change using a GIS-NPS Model. Environmental Management, 2000, 26(6): 643-658.
[33]
Grove M, Harbor J, Engel B, et al. Impacts of urbanization on surface hydrology, Little Eagle Creek, Indiana, and analysis of L-THIA model sensitivity to data resolution. Physical Geography, 2001, 22(2): 135-153.
[34]
Kim Y, Engel B A, Lim K J, et al. Runoff impacts of land-use change in Indian River Lagoon watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2002, 7(3): 245-251.
Kauffman G J, Belden A C, Vonck K J, et al. Link between impervious cover and base flow in the White Clay Creek Wild and Sceinc Watershed in Delaware. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 324-335.
[37]
Shuster W D, Bonta J, Thurston H, et al. Impacts of impervious surface on watershed hydrology: A review. UrbanWater Journal, 2005, 2(4): 263-275.
[38]
Carter R W. Magnitude and frequency of floods in suburban areas.U.S. Geological Survey Paper 424-B, B9-B11, Washington, DC: U.S.Geological Survey, 1961.
[39]
Weng Q. Modeling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS. Environmental management, 2001, 28(6): 737-748.
Beihley R E, Kargar M, He Y. Effects of impervious area estimation methods on simulated peak discharge. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 388-398.
[42]
Bhaduri B. A Geographic Information System-based Model of the Long-Term Impact of Land Use Change on Non-point Source Pollution at Watershed Scale [D]. Purdue University, 1998.
[43]
Jennings D B, Jarnagin S T. Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: A historical perspective in a mid-Atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17(5): 471-489.
Glick R H. Impacts of impervious cover and other factors on storm-water quality in Austin, Tex. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 316-323.
Mejía A I, Moglen G E. Spatial patterns of urban development from optimization of flood peaks and imperviousness- based measures. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 416-424.
Rossman L A. Storm water management model user’s manual (Version 5.0), USEPA, EPA/600/R-05/040, 2009: 1-276.
[53]
Schoonover J, Lockaby B G, Pan S. Changes in chemical and physical properties of stream water across an urban- rural gradient in western Georgia. Urban Ecosystems, 2005, 8(1): 107-124.
Sun H, Hewins D B, Latini D, et al. Change in impervious surface area, flood frequency, and water chemistry with the Delaware River Basin during the past 50 yeares: initial results. 2005, http://hdl.handle.net/1860/732.
[57]
Endreny T A, Thomas K E. Improving estimates of simulated runoff quality and quantity using road-enhanced land cover data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 346-351.
[58]
Bhaduri B, Harbor J, Engel B, et al. Assessing watershed-scale, long-term hydrologic impacts of land-use change using a GIS-NPS Model. Environmental Management, 2000, 26(6): 643-658.
[59]
Grove M, Harbor J, Engel B, et al. Impacts of urbanization on surface hydrology, Little Eagle Creek, Indiana, and analysis of L-THIA model sensitivity to data resolution. Physical Geography, 2001, 22(2): 135-153.
[60]
Espy W H, Morgan C W, Masch F D. A study of some effects of urbanization on storm runoff from a small watershed. Report 23. Austin: Texas Water Development Board, 1966.
[61]
Stankowski S J. Population density as an indirect indicator or urban and suburban land-surface modifications. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 800-B. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey, 1972: 25-40.
[62]
Walsh C J. Urban impacts on the ecology of receiving waters: a framework for assessment, conservation and restoration. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 431(2): 107-114.
[63]
Weng Q. Remote Sensing of Impervious Surfaces. London: CRC Press Taylor & Francis, 2008.
Glick R H. Impacts of impervious cover and other factors on storm-water quality in Austin, Tex. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 316-323.
Mejía A I, Moglen G E. Spatial patterns of urban development from optimization of flood peaks and imperviousness- based measures. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 416-424.
Rossman L A. Storm water management model user’s manual (Version 5.0), USEPA, EPA/600/R-05/040, 2009: 1-276.
[78]
Schoonover J, Lockaby B G, Pan S. Changes in chemical and physical properties of stream water across an urban- rural gradient in western Georgia. Urban Ecosystems, 2005, 8(1): 107-124.
Brabec E A. Imperviousness and land-use policy: toward an effective approach to watershed planning. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 425-435.
[81]
Brabec E A, Schulte S, Richards P L. Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 2002, 16(4): 499-514.
Schueler T R, Fraley-McNeal L, Cappiella K. Is impervious cover still important? Review of Recent Research. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 309-315.
Pappas E A, Smith D R, Huang C, et al. Impervious surface impacts to runoff and sediment discharge under laboratory rainfall simulation. Catena, 2008, 72(1): 146-152.
Sun H, Hewins D B, Latini D, et al. Change in impervious surface area, flood frequency, and water chemistry with the Delaware River Basin during the past 50 yeares: initial results. 2005,
[89]
USEPA. National water quality inventory, report to congress executive summary.Washington DC:USEPA ,1995.
[90]
Espy W H, Morgan C W, Masch F D. A study of some effects of urbanization on storm runoff from a small watershed. Report 23. Austin: Texas Water Development Board, 1966.
[91]
Stankowski S J. Population density as an indirect indicator or urban and suburban land-surface modifications. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 800-B. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey, 1972: 25-40.
[92]
Walsh C J. Urban impacts on the ecology of receiving waters: a framework for assessment, conservation and restoration. Hydrobiologia, 2000, 431(2): 107-114.
[93]
Weng Q. Remote Sensing of Impervious Surfaces. London: CRC Press Taylor & Francis, 2008.
[94]
Arnold C L, Gibbons C J. Impervious surface coverage: the emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association, 1996, 62(2): 243-258.
[95]
Xian G, Homer C, Updating the 2001 National Land Cover Database Impervious Surface Products to 2006 using Landsat Imagery Change Detection Methods. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(8): 1676-1686.
[96]
Becker A, Braun P. Disaggregation, aggregation and spatial scaling in hydrological modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 1999, 217(3-4): 239-252.
[97]
UNESCO. Hydrological effects of urbanization. Studies and Reports in Hydrology 18, Paris, France, 1974 .
Sprague L A, Harned D A, Hall D W, et al. Response of stream chemistry during base flow to gradients of urbanization in selected locations across the conterminous United States, 2002-04: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007-5083, 2007:133.
[102]
Sprague L A, Zuellig R E, Dupree J A. Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in the South Platte River Basin, Colorado and Wyoming, chap. A of Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in six metropolitan areas of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-A, 2006: 139.
[103]
Gregory M B, Calhoun D L. Physical, chemical, and biological responses of streams to increasing watershed urbanization in the Piedmont Ecoregion of Georgia and Alabama, Chapter B of Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in six metropolitan areas of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-B, 2007, 104 p., available online only at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5101B;
[104]
Moring J B. Effects of urbanization on the chemical, physical, and biological characteristics of small Blackland Prairie streams in and near the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5101–C, 2009: 31.
[105]
Waite I R, Steven S, Carpenter K D, et al. Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in the Willamette River basin and surrounding area, Oregon and Washington: U. S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5101-D, 2008: 62.
[106]
Ahearn D S, Sheibley R W, Dahlgren R A, et al. Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last freeflowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada, California. Journal of Hydrology, 2005, 313(3-4): 234-247.
Yin Z, Walcott S, Kaplan B, et al. An analysis of the relationship between spatial patterns of water quality and urban development in Shanghai, China. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2005, 29(2):197-221.
Brabec E A. Imperviousness and land-use policy: toward an effective approach to watershed planning. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 425-435.
[121]
Brabec E A, Schulte S, Richards P L. Impervious surfaces and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 2002, 16(4): 499-514.
Schueler T R, Fraley-McNeal L, Cappiella K. Is impervious cover still important? Review of Recent Research. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2009, 14(4): 309-315.
Pappas E A, Smith D R, Huang C, et al. Impervious surface impacts to runoff and sediment discharge under laboratory rainfall simulation. Catena, 2008, 72(1): 146-152.
