全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

国外空间规划研究与实践的新动向及对我国的启示

DOI: 10.11820/dlkxjz.2005.03.010, PP. 79-90

Keywords: 可持续发展,空间规划,全纳性参与,全球化,制度革新,治理

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

空间规划是可持续发展必不可少的公共管理工具。20世纪90年代以来,人们认识到空间规划应该具有协调和整合空间发展的功能,而不仅仅是部门性的土地利用管理体系;应该关注地域的可持续发展,而不是一味地追求增长;应该关注不同利益人之间共识的形成,而不是简单地分析一定地域空间开发的适宜性和先后顺序。20世纪90年代以来国外空间规划实践的一些新动向a)重新分配空间规划的权利和职能;b)注重全纳性的参与;c)重视空间规划的协调与整合;d)强化空间规划的环境维度;e)增强空间规划的灵活性。基于此对我国的空间规划实践得到几点启示a)空间发展的战略框架和行动计划相结合;b)形成适合于我国的规划参与机制;c)在增强规划约束性的基础上增加灵活性;d)强化区域层次的空间规划;e)突出空间规划的公共管理职能。

References

[1]  Healey, P. Collaborative planning. Hampshire: Macmillan Press Ltd. 1997, 9, 72~76,131~132, 177~186.
[2]  Vigar, G., Healey, P., Hull, A. and Davoudi, S. Planning, governance and spatial strategy in Britain: an institutional analysis. Macmillan Press LTD, 2000.
[3]  Hall,P. Planning:Millennial retrospect and prospect. Progress in planning, 2002, 57(3~4): 63~84.
[4]  Harris, N. Spatial development policies and territorial governance in an era of globalization and localization. In: OECD, Towards a new role for spatial planning, 2001, 33~53.
[5]  Allmendinger, P., Prior, A. and Raemaekers, J. Introduction to planning practice. John Wiley & Sons,LTD, 2000, 9~19.
[6]  Atsushi Koresawa and Josef Konvitz. Towards a new role for spatial planning. In: OECD,Towards a new role for spatial planning, 2001, 11~32.
[7]  Friedmann, J. and Weaver, C. Territorial and Function: the evolution of regional planning. London: Edward Arnold (Publisher) Ltd, 1979, 154.
[8]  Healey, P. Towards a more place-focused planning system in Britain. In: Madanipour, A. Hull, A. and Healy, P. The Governance of Place: Space and Planning Processes . Aldershot, Hampshire: Ashgate, 2001, 265~286.
[9]  仇保兴. 19 世纪以来西方城市规划理论演变的六次转折. 规划师, 2003, 19(11): 5~15.
[10]  马润潮. 西方经济地理学之演变及海峡两岸地理学者应有的认识. 地理研究, 2004, 23(5): 585~593.
[11]  Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger P. Conclusion: communicative planning and collaborative planning and the post-positivist planning theory landscape. In: Allmendinger, P. and Tewdwr-Jones, M. Planning future: new direction for planning theory. Routledge.2002, 206~215.
[12]  方创琳. 国外区域发展规划的全新审视及对中国的借鉴. 地理研究, 1999, 18(1): 7~16.
[13]  Frank, J.C, Allen, G.N, Ashok K.D, et al. Currents of change: urban planning and regional development. In: Allen, G, et al. Regional development and planning for the 21st century. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998, 1~18.
[14]  EC, The EU compendium of spatial planning system and policies: France, 1999.
[15]  Making space, sharing space: Fifth National Policy Document on Spatial Planning 2000~2020.
[16]  EC,The EU compendium of spatial planning system and policies: Germany, 1999.
[17]  Gleesona, B, and Low, N. Revaluing planning Rolling back neo-liberalism in Australia. Progress in Planning, 2000, 53(2): 83~164.
[18]  段 进. 关于我国城市规划体系结构的思考. 规划师, 1999, 15(4): 13~18.
[19]  何奇松. 当前城市规划体系存在的缺陷及对策. 城市开发, 2003, 92(8): 18~21.
[20]  Danson, M., Halkier, H., and Cameron, G. Governance , institutional change and regional development. Ashgate, 2000, 8.
[21]  Wheeler, S.M. The new regionalism: key characteristic of an emerging movement. Journal of American Planning Association, 2002, 68(3): 267~278.
[22]  Arbter, R. The Austrian spatial planning system. In: OECD.Towards a new role for spatial planning, 2001, 95~104.
[23]  FAO/UNEP. The Future of Our Land: Facing the Challenge -- Guidelines for Integrated Planning for Sustainable Management of Land Resources, 1999.
[24]  蔡玉梅, 董祚继 等. FAO土地利用规划研究进展综述. 地理科学进展, 2005, 24(1): 70~78.
[25]  Murdoch, J. and Abram, S. Rationalities of planning: development versus environment in planning for housing. Ashgate.2002, 14, 50~65.
[26]  刘卫东, 陆大道. 经济地理学研究进展. 中国科学院院刊. 2004, 19(1): 35~39.
[27]  Allmendinger, P. Planning theory. Palgrave. 2002, 220.
[28]  Albrechts L. Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 2004, 31(5): 743~758.
[29]  Healey, P. The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning: planning and design, 1996, 23 (2): 217~234.
[30]  Richard D. Margerum. Evaluating collaborative planning. Journal of American Planning Association,. 2002, 68(2):279~293.
[31]  Cullingrowth, B and Roger W.C. Planning in the America. New York and London, Routlege, 2003, 20.
[32]  Hiller, J. Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-use Planning. London: Routledge, 2002, 5.
[33]  EC, The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies: The Netherlands, 1999.
[34]  King, P, Annandale, D. and Bailey, J. Integrated economic and environmental planning in Asia: a review of progress and proposals for policy reform. Progress in Planning, 2003, 59 (4) : 233~315.
[35]  Uitermark, J. Re-scaling, ‘scale fragmentation’ and the regulation of antagonistic relationships. Progress in Human Geography, 2002, 26(6): 743~765.
[36]  Shaw, D., Roberts, P. and Walsh J. Regional Planning and Development in Europe. Ashgate, 2000.
[37]  毛汉英. 日本第五次全国综合开发规划的基本思路及对我国的借鉴意义. 世界地理研究, 2000, 9(3): 105~112.
[38]  崔功豪. 当前城市与区域规划问题的几点思考. 城市规划, 2002. 26(2): 40~42.
[39]  Albrechts, L, Healey, P. and Kunzmann, K.R. Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of America Planning Association, 2003, 69(2): 113~129.
[40]  EC, The EU compendium of spatial planning system and policies, 1997.
[41]  仇保兴. 从法治的原则来看《城市规划法》的缺陷. 城市规划, 2002, 26(4): 11~14.
[42]  陆大道. 中国区域发展的新因素与新格局. 地理研究, 2003, 22(3): 261~271.
[43]  Newman, P. Sustainability and planning of government(2004.11) http://www.sustainability.dpc.wa.gov.au/docs/SustainabilityandPlanning.pdf.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133