全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2014 

缅老泰交界地区刀耕火种农业的时空变化格局

DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201408012

Keywords: 刀耕火种农业,空间变化,空间自相关,Moran's I指数,缅老泰交界区

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要: 刀耕火种农业深刻影响着东南亚地区的土地利用/土地覆被变化。研究刀耕火种农业的空间变化及其影响因素,对科学理解东南亚地区土地利用/土地覆被变化、农民生活方式变化和维持生态系统服务有重要作用。以缅老泰交界地区为研究区,运用遥感手段提取1996年、2000年、2003年和2011年四个时期刀耕火种农业的空间分布信息,并运用GeoDA空间自相关分析方法和GIS空间分析技术,分析了不同时间段刀耕火种农业的时空变化格局、刀耕火种农业面积和破碎化程度的空间自相关性,并对不同国家境内时空变化差异的原因进行了探讨。研究表明:① 缅老泰交界地区刀耕火种农业面积经历了一个小幅增加—小幅减少—大幅增加的变化过程,总体上净增加;其中,泰国清莱府分布最多,老挝波乔省增幅最大,缅甸大其力县净减少。② 缅老泰交界区刀耕火种农业斑块面积、破碎化程度空间分布均具有正相关性,刀耕火种农业面积的空间正相关性总体上有所提高,而破碎化程度的空间正相关性总体上略有降低。③ 轮歇周期、社会经济发展水平可能是不同国家境内刀耕火种农业空间变化差异的主要原因。

References

[1]  Rasul G, Thapa G B. Shifting cultivation in the mountains of south and Southeast Asia: regional patterns and factors influence the change. Land degradation & development, 2003, 14(5): 495-508.
[2]  刘晓娜. 中老缅交界地区土地利用/土地覆被变化研究. 北京:中国科学院大学博士论文, 2013.[Liu Xiaona. Study on Land Use and Land Cover Change in the Border Region of China, Laos and Myanmar, Ph.D thesis. Beijing: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013.]
[3]  Myers N. Tropical forests: the main deforestation fronts. Environmental Conservation, 1993, 20(1): 9-16.
[4]  Achard F, Eva H D, Stibig H J et al. Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science. 2002, 297 (5583): 999-1002.
[5]  Rumpel C, Alexis M, Chabbi A et al. Black carbon contribution to soil organic matter composition in tropical sloping land under slash and burn agriculture. Geoderma. 2006, 130 (1): 35-46.
[6]  Padoch C, Pinedo-Vasquez M. Saving slash-and-burn to save biodiversity. Biotropica. 2010, 42 (5): 550-552.
[7]  Fox J M. How blaming “slash and burn” farmers is deforesting mainland Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Issues, 2000, 47: 1-8.
[8]  Mertz O, Wadley R L, Nielsen U et al. A fresh look at shifting cultivation: Fallow length an uncertain indicator of productivity. Agricultural Systems, 2008, 96(1): 75-84.
[9]  Cramb R A, Colfer C J P, Dressler W et al. Swidden transformations and rural livelihoods in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology, 2009, 37(3): 323-346.
[10]  Schmidt-Vogt D, Leisz S J, Mertz O et al. An assessment of trends in the extent of swidden in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology, 2009, 37(3): 269-280.
[11]  Thongmanivong S, Yayoi F,Phanvilay K et al. Agrarian land use transformation in Northern Laos: from swidden to rubber. Southeast Asian Studies,2009, 47(3): 330-347.
[12]  Mertz O, Padoch C, Fox J et al. Swidden change in Southeast Asia: understanding causes and consequences. Human Ecology, 2009, 37(3): 259-264.
[13]  Padoch C, Coffey K, Mertz O et al. The demise of swidden in Southeast Asia? Local realities and regional ambiguities. Geografisk Tidsskrift, 2009, 107(1): 29-41.
[14]  Lawrence D, Peart D R., Leighton M. The impact of shifting cultivation on a rainforest landscape in West Kalimantan: spatial and temporal dynamics. Landscape Ecology, 1998, 13(3): 135-148.
[15]  Grogan K, Birch-Thomsen T, Lyimo J. Transition of shifting cultivation and its impact on people's livelihoods in the Miombo woodlands of Northern Zambia and south-western Tanzania. Human Ecology, 2013, 41(1): 77-92.
[16]  Ducouriteux, O, Laffort J R, Sacklokham S. Land policy and farming practices in Laos. Development and change, 2005, 36(3): 499-526.
[17]  Fukushima M, Kanzaki M, Thein H M et al. Recovery process of fallow vegetation in the traditional Karen swidden cultivation system in the Bago Mountain range, Myanmar. Southeast Asian Studies, 2007, 45(3): 317-333.
[18]  Heinimann A, Hett C, Hurni K et al. Socio-economic perspective on shifting cultivation landscapes in Northern Laos. Human Ecology, 2013, 41(1): 51-62.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133