全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2010 

农村社区农户互动效应的定量评估——来自河南省杞县孟寨村的实证

DOI: 10.11821/yj2010100004

Keywords: 农户互动,互动效应,信息流动

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要: 信息流动会使农户产生互动学习效应,进而影响农户的农业生产率。基于河南省孟寨村第8小组农户的普查,获得有关农户亲戚、邻居和与之地块邻近农户的社会经济特征和大蒜产量的信息,对这些群组内部的互动学习效应进行检验,并识别不同类型的互动效应。结果表明:内生互动效应仅存在于亲缘群组;情境互动效应存在于地邻群组和邻里群组,但在两个群组中存在一定的差异;关联效应在三个群组均存在,与亲缘群组相比,邻里群组和地邻群组中关联效应更大,但在亲缘群组中,关联效应远小于内生互动效应,在邻里群组和地邻群组中也远小于情境互动效应。研究结论对国外学者的发现进行了修正。这种理论研究具有重要的政策含义。

References

[1]  Feder G, Just R E, Zilberman D. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1985, 33(2): 255~298.
[2]  Besley T, Case A. Modeling technology adoption in developing countries. American Economic Review, 1993, 83(2): 396~402.
[3]  辛良杰, 李秀彬, 朱会义, 等. 农户土地规模与生产率的关系及其解释的印证——以吉林省为例. 地理研究, 2009, 28(5): 1276~1284.
[4]  鲁礼新, 马昌河, 鲁奇. 水城县沙坡村农户经济行为调查研究. 地理研究, 2004, 23(2): 218~226.
[5]  Ellison G, Fudenberg D. Rules of thumb for social learning. Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(4): 612~643.
[6]  Ellison G, Fudenberg D. Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 110(1): 93~125.
[7]  Foster A D, Rosenzweig M R. Learning by doing and learning from others: Human capital and technical change in agriculture. Journal of Political Economy, 1995, 103(6): 1176~1209.
[8]  Manski C F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 1993, 60(3): 531~542.
[9]  Manski C F. Economic analysis of social interaction. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2000, 14: 115~136.
[10]  Udry C, Conley T. Social learning through networks: The adoption of new agricultural technologies in Ghana. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2001, 83(3): 668~673.
[11]  Bandiera O, Rasul I. Social networks and technology adoption in northern Mozambique. The Economic Journal, 2006, 116(514): 869~902.
[12]  李小建. 农户地理论. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
[13]  Becker G. A theory of social interaction. The Journal of Political Economy, 1974, 82(6): 1063~1093.
[14]  李涛. 社会互动与投资选择. 经济研究, 2006, (8): 45~57.
[15]  Durlauf S. Neighborhood effects. In: Henderson J V, Thisse J F. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 2004.2174~2242.
[16]  陆铭, 张爽. "人以群分":非市场互动和群分效应的文献评论. 经济学(季刊), 2007, 6(3): 991~1020.
[17]  Brock W A, Durlauf S N. Interactions-based models. In: Heckman J, Leamer E. Handbook of Econometrics. Amsterdam:Elsevier, 2001. 3297~3380.
[18]  Bardhan P, Udry C. Development Microeconomics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[19]  Bala V, Goyal S. Learning from neighbours. The Review of Economic Studies, 1998, 65: 595~621.
[20]  Case A. Neighborhood influence and technological change. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1992, 22: 491~508.
[21]  Munshi K. Social learning in a heterogeneous population: Technology diffusion in the Indian green revolution. Journal of Development Economics, 2004, 73(1): 185~213.
[22]  Borjas G J. Ethnicity, neighborhoods, and human capital externalities. American Economic Review, 1995,85(3): 365~390.
[23]  刘鹤玲. 亲缘选择理论:生物有机体的亲缘利他行为及其基因机制. 华中师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 42(1): 114~118.
[24]  郑传贵. 社会资本与农村社区发展. 上海: 学林出版社, 2007.
[25]  叶航. 利他行为的经济学解释. 经济学家, 2005, (3): 22~29.
[26]  班杜拉. 社会学习理论. 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 1989.
[27]  高峰强. 罗推尔社会行为学习理论述评. 山东师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1996, (1): 55~62.
[28]  Durlauf S N. On the empirics of social capital. The Economic Journal, 2002, 112(483): 459~479.
[29]  Isham J. The effect of social capital on fertilizer adoption: Evidence from rural Tanzania, The Journal of African Economies, 2002, 11(1): 39~60.
[30]  李小建.还原论与农户地理研究.地理研究, 2010,29(5): 767~777.
[31]  林毅夫. 制度、技术与中国农业发展. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1994.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133