全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
-  2015 

遗址保护区乡村居民景观价值感知与态度评价——以汉长安城遗址保护区为例

DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201510014

Keywords: 参与式制图,景观价值,相容度,社区参与,社区态度,汉长安城遗址

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

摘要: 在与社区相关的开发或保护活动中,社区居民主观态度直接影响着规划项目可行性。探索适用的社区态度表达方法,成为社区有效参与规划决策的关键。利用参与式制图和半结构访谈的方法,对汉长安城遗址保护区9个村落的243位居民景观感知价值进行调查,采用热点分析、对应分析和相容度指标分析,揭示居民感知的景观价值空间构成,景观价值与土地利用的对应关系及其与现有搬迁保护方案的相容度,在此基础上识别出4种社区态度类型区域。研究表明:① 基于相容度反映的汉长安城遗址社区态度具有地点依赖性,这种态度的空间差异为社区规划管理、矛盾冲突管控提供了更细致的社会数据支持;② 案例社区居民景观感知价值在空间分布上具有规律性,并与一定的物质景观基础(土地利用)相关联,这种关联性的认识,有利于解释景观变化可能产生的社会现象;③ 参与式制图结合景观价值的调查为感知景观的研究提供了有效方法,通过制图可视化,统计分析和指标模型构建,能够揭示景观感知价值的空间结构特征。

References

[1]  吴莉萍, 周尚意. 城市化对乡村社区地方感的影响分析: 以北京三个乡村社区为例. 北京社会科学, 2009, (2): 30-35.http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_bjshkx200902005.aspx
[2]  [Wu Liping, Zhou Shangyi.Urbanization impacts on sense of place for rural communities: A case study of three villages in Beijing. Social Science of Beijing, 2009, (2): 30-35.]
[3]  喻忠磊, 杨新军, 杨涛. 乡村农户适应旅游发展的模式及影响机制: 以秦岭金丝峡景区为例. 地理学报, 2013, 68(8):1143-1156.http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_dlxb201308012.aspx
[4]  [Yu Zhonglei, Yang Xinjun, Yang Tao.Exploring conditions, determinants and mechanisms of rural households' adaptability to tourism development: A case study of Jinsixia in Qinling Mountains. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2013, 68(8): 1143-1156.]
[5]  刘笑团, 周维禄. 城市拆迁中的利益冲突及解决途径. 西南农业大学学报: 社会科学版, 2006, 4(2): 84-87.http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_xnnydxxb-shkx200602020.aspx doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5379.2006.02.020
[6]  [Liu Xiaotuan, Zhou Weilu.Interest conflicts in resettlement programs in urban areas and the possible approaches to their solution. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University: Social Science Edition, 2006, 4(2): 84-87.]
[7]  宁骚, 孔祥利. 城市拆迁决策过程中公民参与的困境及其突破.湘潭大学学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2007, 31(4): 9-14.
[8]  [Ning Sao, Kong Xiangli.Dilemmas of civil participation and its breakthrough in the urban house demolition decision. Journal of Xiangtan University: Philosophy and Social Sciences, 2007, 31(4): 9-14.]
[9]  McCall M K, Dunn C E. Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for good governance. Geoforum, 2012, 43(1): 81-94.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718511001369 doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007
[10]  Knigg L, Cope M.Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative and quanitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A, 2006, 38(1): 2021-2037.
[11]  Brown G.Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: Reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal, 2012, 25(2): 7-18.
[12]  Brown G, Christopher M, Raymond C M.Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 122(2): 196-208.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204613002211 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007
[13]  Ryan R L.The social landscape of planning: integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 119(4): 361-363.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204611000521 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.015
[14]  Sieber R.Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2006, 96(3): 491-507.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x/references doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
[15]  Zube E H.Perceived land use patterns and landscape values. Landscape Ecology, 1987, 1(1): 37-45.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02275264 doi: 10.1007/BF02275264
[16]  Brown G.Mapping landscape values and development preferences: A method for tourism and residential planning. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2006, 8(2): 101-113.http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jtr.562/abstract doi: 10.1002/jtr.562
[17]  Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J, Clement J M.An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 36(1): 68-79.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X13002707 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.008
[18]  Clement J M, Cheng A S.Using analyses of public value orientations, attitudes and preferences to inform national forest planning in Colorado and Wyoming. Applied Geography, 2010, 31(2): 393-400.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622810001165 doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.001
[19]  Brown G, Weber D.Public participation GIS: A new method for national park planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2011, 102(4): 1-15.http://xueshu.baidu.com/link?url=e7m1-JT8CloojM_KzsD82M0Xkbnvqw2_WeeFrHUI6aERPwYQ5rY2hEsS9fcBUAxiulldeM6Oxvw6_bOgiWPHLZreF4WOSZfBy-dmbAGf15N3OIfW1d70mkDrFjId0Gx4YDSE5hMXxa99o_PSL50-Hwmw9bNQ3aSmrQno1ZUkJKYPY1X-tfhLanRpcvxk6uoc2iNos0oBVtI-IlJfV8jhFjRBzhiJ_Hbz04sTS0oqnx7FO3B82xNlp4HCeYmpYyd2pse07VfG3RGOTSV5MJ1NWr-BHuxQsVEbb3joqjG1tNkfrg-IxVNDkqfB3X1zFwevYdKPasxki_iUxlq0ndX7rFjES0FfwrS0VDW5W5N62kS&wd=Public%20participation%20GIS%3A%20A%20new%20method%20for%20national%20park%20planning.
[20]  Winter C, Lockwood M.The natural area value scale: a new instrument for measuring natural area values. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 11(4): 11-20.http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14486563.2004.10648594 doi: 10.1080/14486563.2004.10648594
[21]  Alessa N, Kliskey A, Brown G.Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2008, 85(1): 27-39.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204607002216 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007
[22]  Riper C J V, Kyle G T, Sutton S G, et al. Mapping outdoor recreationists' perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Applied Geography, 2012, 35(1): 164-173.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622812000641 doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.06.008
[23]  Tyrvainnen L, Makinen K, Schipperijn J.Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 79(1): 5-19.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204606000636 doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.003
[24]  李玏, 刘家明, 宋涛, 等. 北京市绿带游憩空间分布特征及其成因. 地理研究, 2015, 34(8): 1507-1521.http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-DLYJ201508010.htm
[25]  [Li Le, Liu Jiaming, Song Tao, et al.Spatial characteristics and causes of recreational space in the urban green belt of Beijing, China. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(8): 1507-1521.]
[26]  Brown G, Reed P.Validation of a forest values typology for use in national forest planning. Forest Science, 2000, 46(2): 240-247.
[27]  Brown G, Reed P.Values compatibility analysis: using public participation geographic information systems (PPGIS) for decision support in national forest management. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 2012, 5(4): 317-332. doi: 10.1007/s12061-011-9072-x
[28]  Spartz J T, Shaw B R.Place meanings surrounding an urban natural area: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2011, 31(4): 344-352.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494411000338 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.04.002
[29]  闫庆武. 空间数据分析方法在人口数据空间化中的应用. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2011.
[30]  [Yan Qingwu.Spatial Data Analysis Methods in the Application of Population Data Spatialization. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2011.]
[31]  Doxey G V.A causation theory of visitor-resident irritants: Methodology and research inferences. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Travel and Tourism Research Association. San Diego: Academic Press, 1975: 195-198.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133