全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

基于决策者信任度的风险型混合多属性群决策方法

DOI: 10.13195/j.kzyjc.2012.1758, PP. 481-486

Keywords: 信任,前景理论,投影方法,风险型决策

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

考虑决策者对风险型混合多属性评价结果的信任程度不同,提出基于前景理论和改进投影理论的群决策方法.建立一个数组以描述在不同信任度下群决策专家的评价结果,并将数组中混合数据类型转化为三角模糊数.在考虑决策者信任度的前提下集结群信息、确定属性权重.引入综合前景价值和考虑权重的投影相对接近度两种方法对方案进行排序.最后通过实例表明了所提出方法的合理性和有效性.

References

[1]  刘培德, 王娅姿. 一种属性权重未知的区间概率风险型混合多属性决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2012, 27(2): 276-280.
[2]  (Liu P D, Wang Y Z. Method of hybrid multi-attribute decision-making with risk of interval probability under attribute weight unknown[J]. Control and Decision, 2012, 27(2): 276-280.)
[3]  毕文杰, 陈晓红. 基于Bayes 理论与Monte Carlo 模拟的风险型多属性群决策方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2010, 32(5): 971-975.
[4]  (Bi W J, Chen X H. Risky multicriteria group decision approach based on Bayesian theory and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2010, 32(5): 971-975.)
[5]  Xu Gai-li, Liu Fang. An approach to group decision making based on interval multiplicative and fuzzy preference relations by using projection[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013, 37(6): 3929-3943.
[6]  刘培德. 一种基于前景理论的不确定语言变量风险型多属性决策方法[J]. 控制与决策, 2011, 26(6): 893-897.
[7]  (Liu P D. Method for multi-attribute decision-making under risk with the uncertain linguistic variables based on prospect theory[J]. Control and Decision, 2011, 26(6): 893-897.)
[8]  Wim D N. Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2012, 7(1): 28-38.
[9]  Yau S S, Yin Y. Qos-based service ranking and selection for service-based systems[C]. 2011 IEEE Int Conf on Services Computing(SCC). Washington: IEEE, 2011: 56-63.
[10]  Andrea I, Mario P, Edmund T, et al. Confidence-related decision making[J]. J of Neurophysiology, 2010, 104(1): 539-547.
[11]  Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Economica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[12]  Wu G, Gonzalez R. Curvature of the Probability weighting function[J]. Management Science, 1996, 42(12): 1676-1690.
[13]  王坚强. 信息不完全的Fuzzy 群体多准则决策的规划方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2004, 26(11): 1604-1609.
[14]  Ronald R Y, Dimitar P F. Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1994: 145-189.
[15]  Philippe F, Marc R. Ranking and defuzzification methods based on area compensation[J]. Fuzzy Sets Systems, 1996, 82(3): 319-330.
[16]  Richard H T, Amos T, Daniel K, et al. The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test[J]. The Quarterly J of Economics, 1997, 112(2): 647-661.
[17]  (Wang J Q. Programming method of fuzzy group multiple criteria decision making with incomplete information[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2004, 26(11): 1604-1609.)
[18]  Atanassov K T. Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 110(2): 267-269.
[19]  Xu Z S. Projection method for uncertain multi-attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives[J]. Int J of Information Technology and Decision Making, 2004, 3(3): 429-434.
[20]  G¨ulc?in B, Gizem C? . A new incomplete preference relations based approach to quality function deployment[J]. Information Science, 2012, 206(5): 30-41.
[21]  Guang Q Z, Jie L. An integrated group decision-making method dealing with fuzzy preference for alternatives and individual judgements for selection criteria[J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2003, 12(6): 501-515.
[22]  Dmitar P F, Ronald Y. A generalized defuzzification method via BAD distributions[J]. Int J of Intelligent Systems, 1991, 6(7): 687-697.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133