全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

荒漠河岸胡杨林生态系统涡度相关通量数据处理与质量控制方法研究

, PP. 626-635

Keywords: 涡度相关法,数据处理,质量控制,胡杨林生态系统

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

涡度相关通量数据处理与质量控制是保证各观测台站数据质量、实现数据共享与综合集成的前提。然而,由于各个背景样地差异比较大,目前这一方面还没有统一、精确的方法可用。因此本文以黑河下游额济纳旗胡杨林生态系统8月份的涡度数据为例,介绍了各处理方法对通量结果的影响,结果表明:相比其它各校正方法而言,野点值剔除及密度效应校正(WPL)对CO2通量的影响最大,其值分别降低了11%和42%;WPL校正对潜热通量的影响最大,其值增加了6.5%;超声虚温校正对感热通量的影响最大,其值降低了9.3%。就数据质量控制与评价的方法研究,发现该样地能量平衡闭合率为71%,分别有65%和72%的数据通过了湍流的平稳性检验和湍流发展的充分性检验,数据质量较好。通过该研究,以期为荒漠河岸林生态系统涡度相关数据的处理提供参考。

References

[1]  于贵瑞,王秋凤,于振良. 陆地生态系统水—碳耦合循环与过程管理研究[J]. 地球科学进展,2004,(5):831-839.
[2]  陶冶,张元明. 中亚干旱荒漠区植被碳储量估算[J]. 干旱区地理,2013,36(4):615-622. 浏览
[3]  FOKEN T,WICHURA B. Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,1996,78(1-2):83-105.
[4]  MAUDER M,FOKEN T,CLEMENT R,et al. Quality control of CarboEurope flux data-Part 2:Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software[J]. Biogeosciences,2008,5(2):451-462.
[5]  张佩,袁富国,朱治林. 荒漠河岸林涡度相关通量测定中平均时间的确定及其对通量计算的影响[J]. 干旱区地理,2013,33(3):400-408.
[6]  张智慧,王维真,马明国,等. 黑河综合遥感联合试验涡动相关通量数据处理及产品分析[J]. 遥感技术与应用,2010,(6):788-796.
[7]  GASH J H C,DOLMAN A J. Sonic anemometer (co)sine response and flux measurement:I. The potential for (co)sine error to affect sonic anemometer-based flux measurements[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2003,119(3-4):195-207.
[8]  WILCZAK James M,ONCLEY Steven P,STAGE Steven A. Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms[J]. BoundaryLayer Meteorology,2001,99(1):127-150.
[9]  MASSMAN W J,LEE X. Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long-term studies of carbon and energy exchanges[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2002,113(1-4):121-144.
[10]  吴家兵,关德新,孙晓敏,等. 长白山阔叶红松林CO2交换的涡动通量修订[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2004,(S2):95-102.
[11]  王介民,王维真,刘绍民,等. 近地层能量平衡闭合问题-综述及个例分析[J]. 地球科学进展,2009,(7):705-713.
[12]  WEBB E K,PEARMAN G I,LEUNING R. Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,1980,106(447):85-100.
[13]  WILSON Kell,GOLDSTEIN Allen,FALGE Eva,et al. Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2002,113(1-4):223-243.
[14]  MAHRT L. Flux sampling errors for aircraft and towers[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,1998,15(2):416-429. 2.0.CO;2 target="_blank">
[15]  楚良海,刘文兆,朱元骏,等. 黄土高原沟壑区通量数据空间代表性研究[J]. 地球科学进展,2009,(2):211-218.
[16]  赵晓松,关德新,吴家兵,等. 长白山阔叶红松林通量观测的footprint及源区分布[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2005,(3):17-23.
[17]  SCHMID H P. Source areas for scalars and scalar fluxes[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1994,67(3):293-318.
[18]  FOKEN Thomas,G?OCKEDE Mathisa,MAUDER Matthisa,et al. ‘Post-Field Data Quality Control’[M]// LEE Xuhui,MASSMAN William,BEVERLY Law. Handbook of micrometeorology. Springer Netherlands,2005:181-208.
[19]  徐自为,刘绍民,宫丽娟,等. 涡动相关仪观测数据的处理与质量评价研究[J]. 地球科学进展,2008,(4):357-370.
[20]  MASSMAN William,LEE XUHUI,LAW BE. Handbook of micrometeorology. A guide for surface flux measurements and analysis[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2006,136:80-82.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133