|
OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
|
|
|
|
中国城市居民的家庭代际分/合居行为及其影响要素——以成都市为例
DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201508009, PP. 1296-1312
Keywords: 家庭分/合居,成都市,代际分居率,中国,成都
Abstract:
1978年以来,中国家庭小型化趋向非常显著,尤以代际分居为核心诱因,代际分居对转型期中国的社会稳定、家庭和睦乃至住房市场都构成了很大的影响。而且,中国的代际分居现象及其机制和西方社会存在根本的不同,此文讨论了转型期基于代际分居率和家庭生命周期的中国城市居民分/合居行为的概念模型,随后选择成都市主城区进行了实证,因为该地区不但社会经济发展速度快,户籍居民的老龄化趋向明显,而且兼受中国传统文化和西方文化的耦合影响。与西方发达社会基于家庭生命周期先合居、后分居的规律不同,中国城市居民家庭居住行为呈现出合居—（小）分居—合居—分居—（小）合居—（小）分居—（小）合居的变化过程。采用2012-2013年的实地调研数据,采用Pearson相关性分析法提取主要影响因素,后采用二元logistic回归方法研究了主要因素对居民分/合居行为的显著性和正负影响,并对不同年龄段的城市居民家庭代际分/合居行为的代际分/合居选择及其影响因素进行了分析。结论如下①文化程度、配偶健在、家庭人均收入、父母应帮子女成家、父母应帮子女买房、与子女/父母代际分居意愿、作息习惯、饮食习惯、安静/热闹偏好、卫生习惯、居家习惯和私密空间习惯与家庭代际分居率正向显著;②年龄、家庭居住面积、父母应帮忙抚养孙辈、（子女）应该养老、父母/子女应临近居住、养儿防老、养育习惯等变量与家庭代际分居率负向显著;③不同年龄段居民的代际分/合居选择的影响因素及其显著度有所差异。
| [1] | ZhouFulin.Astatisticstudyonthefamilystructureofourcountry.EconomicSurvey,2006(2):90-92.Thisresearchoffamilystructureisbasedupon0.95‰sampledataofthe2000NationalDemographicCensus.Dataa-nalysisleadstosomeprincipalconclusions:thefamilystructureofChinahaschangedgreatlyfrom1990to2000,butthenuclearhouseholdisthemostimportanttypeoffamilystructure.Thereisabviousdifferenceinfamilystructurebetweencities,townsandthecountryside.CNKI[周福林.我国家庭结构的统计研究.经济经纬,2006(2):90-92.]笔者利用第5次全国人口普查0．95‰抽样数据对2000年我国家庭结构的状况进行了研究。结果表明，目前我国的家庭结构类型以核心家庭为主体，三代直系家庭也占有重要地位。与1990年相比，二代联合家庭和一对夫妇户的比重10年间有一定的增加，隔代家庭的比重也有所增加，四代直系和四代联合家庭的比重降低。市镇乡之间家庭结构存在明显的差异。DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1096.2006.02.025CNKI
|
| [2] | ChaiYanwei,HuZhiyong,WuZongqing.Oncharacteasticsandmechanismofintraurbanresidents'migrationinTianjincity,China.GeographicalResearch,2000,19(4):391-340.原文[柴彦威,胡智勇,仵宗卿.天津城市内部人口迁居特征及机制分析.地理研究,2000,19(4):391-340.]在对天津市民问卷调查等第一手资料进行详细分析的基础上,总结出天津城市内部人口迁居的迁移性、迁移方向性、迁移距离和迁移空间类型等特征,初步分析了迁居机制及其变化,提出天津城市居住空间结构调整的相关建议DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2000.04.008原文
|
| [3] | ZhangYan,ChaiYanwei,LiuZhilin.Spatialdifferencesofhome-workseparationandtheimpactsofhousingpolicyandurbansprawl:EvidencefromhouseholdsurveydatainBeijing.ActaGeographicaSinica,2011,66(2):157-166.原文[柴彦威,张艳,刘志林.职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究.地理学报,2011,66(2):157-166.]制度转型与空间重构背景下,中国大城市的居住与就业空间关系发生明显变化,职住分离现象逐渐凸显。尽管城市地理学者逐步关注转型期城市居住与就业空间关系的变化对居民通勤行为的影响,然而深入探讨微观个体所承受的职住分离程度的差异性及其影响因素的实证研究仍然缺乏。基于对北京城市520户家庭、806个通勤样本的问卷调查数据,本文借助多元回归模型验证了居住区类型、家庭及住房状况、以及其他社会经济属性等居民职住分离程度差异性的影响,从而折射城市转型过程中宏观制度性及结构性因素（如土地市场化改革、住房政策、单位制度改革、城市空间扩展等）对个体日常生活经历差异性的影响。原文
|
| [4] | FengJian,ZhouYixing.UrbaninternalmovesandrelatedspatialbehaviorintheprocessofsuburbanizationinBeijing:Basedontheanalysisofonethousandquestionnaires.GeographicalResearch,2004(2):227-242.Usingthedataof1,000questionnaires,theauthorstrytoanalyzethebehaviorofintra-urbanmigrationandresidentialsuburbanization,thesecondhouseandseasonalsuburbanization,andothercorrelativespatialbehaviorsincludingcommuting,travelingandshoppingofurbanresidentsintheprocessofsuburbanizationinBeijing.Themainfindingsincludethefollowing:Tobeginwith,themovingratioishigherinBeijing,comparingwiththatinotherChinesecities,andthemovingratiointheinnersuburbofBeijingisthehighest,comparingwiththatinthecoreandtheoutersuburb,showingthetypicalcharacteristicsofinnersuburbanizationinBeijing.Thefactthatthetemporalcharacteristicsofintra-urbanmigrationaccordwellwiththeprocessofdevelopmentofrealestateandrenewaloftheoldcityinBeijingreflectsthedevelopmentofresidentialsuburbanization.InBeijing,investigationofintra-urbanmigrationalsoshowsthatlocalurbanizationandinnersuburbanizationareobvious,thatthemostimportantreasonsofintra-urbanmigrationincludetheallocationofhousingbydanwei(placeofwork),andhousingrehabilitation,andthattheseparationbetweenhabitationandplaceofworkhasbrokenthetraditionalpatternofunityofhabitationandjob,causingthechangesofurbanresidentialspatialstructure.Secondly,theauthorsthinkthatthereare900thousandsecondhousesinBeijing.Then,whydourbanresidentshavetheirsecondhouses?Investigationshowsthatthemostimportantreasonistheallocationofhousingbydanwei,andthesecondoneisthattheyneedthemwhenwork.Mostofthesecondhousesareputouttolease,forotherpurposeandinhabitancybyparentsorsomerelativescomingfromhometown.InBeijing,secondhousehasnotreachedtheextentofcentralizationinlargescale,althoughitmanifestedsomecharacteristicsofseasonalsuburbanization.Thirdly,thebehaviorofcommuting,travelingandshoppingofBeijing'sresidentschangedintheprocessofresidentialsuburbanization.MigrationimprovesthecommutingoflongperiodinBeijing.Onweekdays,migrationimprovesthetrafficconditionsofurbanresidents,withthedecreasingofratioofchangingbusesinthecoreandtheincreasingofratioofprivatecarsinthecoreandinnersuburb,whileonweekends,migrationalsochangesthetrafficwaysofurbanresidentswiththeincreasingofratiosofnon-changingbusesandprivatecars,inflectingthecharacteristicsofchangeandrenewalofurbantrafficways.ThechangesofchoiceofshoppingplaceofBeijing'sresidentsandthechangesoffrequencyofgoingtoshoppingplaceofresidentsnowandtenyearsagoareinvestigatedandanalyzed,indicatingthaturbanresidentsinBeijingaredecreasingtheirdependenceoncommercialfacilitiesinthecore,andthatresidentialsuburbanizationisquickeningitsstep.原文[冯健,周一星.郊区化进程中北京城市内部迁居及相关空间行为:基于千份问卷调查的分析.地理研究,2004(2):227-242.]利用千份问卷调查资料,研究居住郊区化进程中北京城市居民的迁居行为、第二住宅与季节性郊区化,以及包括通勤、出行和购物等在内的相关空间行为。研究表明,北京本地城市化和近郊化的特征明显,单位福利分房和原居住地拆迁是居民迁居的主要原因,居民职住分离现象十分普遍,传统单位制下职住合一的空间格局已被打破;城市第二住宅多用于商业出租等用途,表现出一定程度的季节性郊区化特点,但尚未达到规模集聚的程度;在居住郊区化的进程中,北京城市居民的通勤、出行和购物等空间行为均有一定程度的变化。原文
|
| [5] | FengXiaotian.Theone-childparents'emptynest:Whentostartandhowlongwillbe.SocialSciences,2009(1).[风笑天.独生子女父母的空巢期:何时开始,会有多长.社会科学,2009(1).]Ebscohost
|
| [6] | ZhuJinghui.Familystructure,intergenerationalrelationsandtheelderlysupport:TakingXuevillageinAnhuiasacase.NorthwestPopulationJournal,2010,31(3):51-57.[朱静辉.家庭结构、代际关系与老年人赡养:以安徽薛村为个案的考察.西北人口,2010,31(3):51-57.]CNKI
|
| [7] | YueHongjuan.Studyonthesituationandinfluencingfactorsofruralfamilyprovidingforaged:BasedontheinvestigationofTcountyinHenanprovince[D].Wuhan:HuazhongAgriculturalUniversity,2011.[岳红娟.农村家庭养老现状及影响因素研究:基于河南省T县的实证分析[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2011.]
|
| [8] | WangShuxin.ResearchonSocialChangeandInter-generationalRelations.Beijing:CapitalEconomicandTradeUniversityPress,2004.[王树新.社会变革与代际关系研究.北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社,2004.]
|
| [9] | FeiXiaotong.AthirdroundoftalksoverChina'sfamilystructurechange.ActaScientiarumNaturaliumUniversitatisPekinensis,1986(3):3-7.[费孝通.三论中国家庭结构的变动.北京大学学报,1986(3):3-7.]1982年3月我在日本东京国际文化馆,根据我该年在江村的调查资料和过去的调查资料之比较,讲了一篇《论中国家庭结构的变动》(以下简称“一论”)。返国后于该年十月五访江村,1983年3月在香港中文大学主办的《中国文化和现代化研讨会》第一次会议上,根据新的资料,讲了一篇《家庭结构变动中的老年赡养问题》,副题是《再论中国家庭结构的CNKI维普
|
| [10] | WangYuesheng.AnalysisoncontemporaryChinesefamilystructurechange.Society,2006(26):118-126.[王跃生.当代中国家庭结构变动分析.社会,2006(26):118-126.]CNKI
|
| [11] | WangYuesheng.AnalysisonChina'surbanandruralfamilystructurechange:Basedoncensusdataof2010.SocialSciencesinChina,2013(12):60-65.[王跃生.中国城乡家庭结构变动分析:基于2010年人口普查数据.中国社会科学,2013(12):60-65.]维普
|
| [12] | LiuWangbao.Researchreviewandoutlookonlifecourseandlivingchoiceathomeandabroad.WorldRegionalStudies,2006,15(2):100-107.[刘望保.国内外生命历程与居住选择研究回顾和展望.世界地理研究,2006,15(2):100-107.]
|
| [13] | PanYunkang.China'surbanmodernfamilypattern.SociologicalResearch,1987(3).[潘允康.中国城市现代家庭模式.社会学研究,1987(3).]所谓家庭模式,也可以说是家庭类型,它是家庭结构和家庭关系的总合或总称。不同的家庭模式决定于不同的社会,是和社会的生产方式、生活方式相适应的。本文认为在由农业社会向工业社会转变的过程中,特别是在当前正在进行的四个现代化CNKI维普
|
| [14] | LiYinhe.AGrandpa'sGrandson:CaseStudyofChineseFamilyRelationships.Shanghai:ShanghaiCulturePress,2001:106-112.[李银河.“一爷之孙”:中国家庭关系个案研究.上海:上海文化出版社,2001:106-112.]
|
| [15] | ChaiYanwei.UrbanSpace.Beijing:SciencePress,2000.[柴彦威.城市空间.北京:科学出版社,2000.]
|
| [16] | WangXingzhong.ResearchonChina'sUrbanSocialSpatialStructure.Beijing:SciencePress,2000.[王兴中.中国城市社会空间结构研究.北京:科学出版社,2000.]
|
| [17] | MarcuseP,KempenRV.OfStatesandCites:ThePartitioningofUrbanSpace.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress,2002.
|
| [18] | CarterWH,SchillMH,WachterSM.Polarization,publichousingandracialminoritiesinUScities.UrbanStudies,1998,35(10):1889-1911.
|
| [19] | FleischerF.Tochooseahousemeanstochoosealifestyle:Theconsumptionofhousingandclass-structurationinurbanChina.City&Society,2007,19(2):287-311.ResearchGat
|
| [20] | DupontV.Socio-spatialdifferentiationandresidentialsegregationinDelhi:Aquestionofscale.Geoforum,2004,35(2):157-175.Thispaperfocusesonthepatternofsocial-spatialdifferentiationandsegmentationofthemetropolitanareaofDelhi.Themainobjectiveistoanalysethemechanismsofresidentialsegregationandthefactorsthatexplainitbothatthemicro-andmacro-level.InthecontextoftheIndiansocietyanditscastesystemtraditionallyassociatedwithstrongsocialandspatialsegregation,wetrytoappraisetheextenttowhichthemetropolitanizationprocessinDelhiengendersoriginalformsofspatialsegmentationorperpetuatesandstrengthensthetraditionalformsofsocio-spatialdivisions.Attheleveloftheglobalspatialorganizationoftheurbanagglomeration,ourobjectiveistwofold:toanalysethefactorsthatshapedtheurbanlandscapeandintroducedspatialdiscontinuity,fromphysicalbarrierstothedifferenthistoricperiodsandtheimpactoftownplanning;toanalysetheresidentialpatternofdifferentsegmentsoftheurbanpopulation,inordertodetectwhethercertaineconomicandsocio-culturalattributesgenerateapatternofsegregation.Wethenpursueamoredetailedinvestigationatthelevelofazone,basedonthecasestudyofMayurVihar–TrilokpuriineastDelhi.Weanalysetheresidentialpracticesdevelopedbydifferentsocio-economicgroups,theirstrategiesasregardstheoccupationofthegeographicalandeconomicspace,theirtendencytoresidentialclusteringthatleadstoapatternofsocialsegregationattheleveloftheneighbourhood.Inthisperspective,thelinksbetweentheurbanpoliciesatthemacro-levelandtheindividuals’residentialpracticesatthemicro-levelarealsoexamined.Elsevier
|
| [21] | SmithN.TheNewUrbanFrontier:GentrificationandtheRevanchistCity.London:Rutledge,1996.ResearchGat
|
| [22] | DavidsonM,LeeL.New-buildgentrificationandLondon'sriversiderenaissance.EnvironmentandPlanningA,2005,37:1165-1190.ResearchGat
|
| [23] | RichardFMuth.Thestockdemandelasticitiesofnon-farmhousing:Comment.TheReviewofEconomicsandStatistics,1965,47(4):447-449.JSTOR
|
| [24] | RossiPH.Whyfamiliesmove:AStudyoftheSocialPsychologyofUrbanResidentialMobility.London:Sage,1955.ResearchGat
|
| [25] | BrownLA,MooreEG.TheIntra-urbanMigrationProcess:Aperspective.GeografiskaAnnalerSeries,1970,52:1-13.DOI:10.2307/490436JSTOR
|
| [26] | HanushEA,QuigleyJM.Housingmarketdisequilibriumandresidentialmobility.Evanston:NorthwesternUniversityPress,1978:51-99.
|
| [27] | McHughKE,GoberP,ReidN.Determinantsofshortandlong-termmobilityexpectationsforhomeownersandrenters.Demography,1990,27:81-95.pringer
|
| [28] | HendersonJV,IoannidesYM.Dynamicaspectsofconsumerdecisionsinhousingmarkets.JournalofUrbanEconomics,1998,26:212-230.
|
| [29] | PlautSE.Thetimingofhousingtenuretransition.JournalofUrbanEconomics,1987,21:312-322.Noabstractisavailableforthisitem.DOI:10.1016/0094-1190(87)90005-2Elsevier
|
| [30] | Rowntree,BS.Poverty:AStudyofTownLife.London:MacMillan.1903.
|
| [31] | WangFang,ZhangManlu.Literaturereviewfamilylifecycleofhousingdemand.OrientalCulture,2011(3):208.[王芳,张曼路.家庭生命周期住房需求文献综述.东方企业文化？百家论坛,2011(3):208.]本文侧重于以家庭为基础来考察住房市场的买方市场的文献,梳理国外前沿文献,归纳文中的估计和模拟家庭生命周期住房需求的动态结构模型和各范畴之间的关系,基于家庭在面临非耐用消费品消费、住房、金融资产等资产组合选择函数时作出的选择模型,总结实证和理论方法。万方CNKI
|
| [32] | TianFeng.TheresearchoffamilylifecycleincontemporaryChina[D].Beijing:TheChineseAcademyofSocialSciencesGraduateSchool,2011:25.[田丰.中国当代家庭生命周期研究[D].北京:中国社会科学院研究生院,2011:25.]
|
| [33] | LuYuqi.Thepopulationmovementandthevariationofregionaleconomicstructure.GeographicalResearch,1990,9(1):41-46.[陆玉麒.人口移动与区域经济格局变动.地理研究,1990,9(1):41-46.]人口移动是我国近几年发生的重要社会经济现象之一,其机制是东部地区人多地少的推力与西部地区产业结构性空缺的吸力,以及国家对后者特定的工资与粮食政策。它对地域分工格局的变动产生着重大影响。PopulationmovementisoneimportantphenomenainChinainrecentyearsItsmechanismis.(1)thrustofmorepeopleandlesslandeinEasternBelt.(2)SuctionofdualeconomyinwestrenBelt.(3)nationalpolicyonpreferentialwagesandgrainforpasternBelt.PopulationmovementhasanimpartanteffectonthechangeofregionaldivisionpatterninChins:(1)bythemediumofthemovingpeople,thereformsanotherregionaldivisionpattern,whichisruralindustrysystembasedonruraltownindustry;(2)thereformsanotherprofitmechanismcompensatedfromWesternBelttoEasternBelt.ItnotonlywinsmoreprofitinEasternBelt,butalsoehangesdualeconomyinWesternBeltTherefoer,weshouldmakechoiceofacomprehensihleandencouragingattitudeonpopulationmovement;andaspecialgovernmentorganizationforgeneralsurveyofmovingpeopleshouldbesetupatonce.DOI:10.11821/yj1990010006原文
|
| [34] | StokerG.Theoryandurbanpolitics.InternationalPoliticalScienceReview,1998,19(2):119-129.Jstor
|
| [35] | SimmonsJ.Changingresidenceinthecity:Areviewofintra-urbanmobility.GeographicalReview,1968,58:622-651.Jstor
|
| [36] | WellsWD,GubarG.Lifecycleconceptinmarketingresearch.JournalofConsumerResearch,1966(10):281-291.
|
| [37] | RichSU,JainSC.Socialclassandlifecycleaspredictorsofshoppingbehavior.JournalofMarketingResearch,1968,5:41-49.
|
| [38] | GlickPC.Updatingthecycleofthefamily.JournalofMarriageandtheFamily,1977,39.JSTOR
|
| [39] | EngelJF,BlackwellRD,KollatDT.ConsumerBehavior.Hinsdale,Ill:DrydenPress,1978.NII
|
| [40] | GillyMC,EnisBM.Recyclingthefamilylifecycle:Aproposalforredefinition.AdvancesinConsumerResearch,1982,9:271-276.
|
| [41] | RodgersRH,WitneyG.ThefamilycycleintwentiethcenturyCanada.JournalofMarriageandFamily,1981(3).AstudyofCanadianfamiliesshowedCanadiansdelayedchildbearinglonger,spacedtheirchildrenmoreclosely,marriedoffthelastchildearlier,andsurvivejointlylonger.Canadiansaveragelongermarriagesandhavealongerpostparentalperiod.Overalltheanalysisindicatesalong-termstabilityintheCanadianfamilycycle.(Author)OPLINEERIC
|
| [42] | AndreasenAR.Lifestatuschangesandchangesinconsumerpreferencesandsatisfaction.JournalofConsumerResearch,1984,11(3):784-794.Noabstractisavailableforthisitem.DOI:10.1086/209014STORResearchGate
|
| [43] | YangYongchun.ChinaModel:GradualInstitutionalTransformationandGeographicalSpatialEvolution.Lanzhou:LanzhouUniversityPress,2013.[杨永春.中国模式:渐进制度转型与地理空间演变.兰州:兰州大学出版社,2013.]
|
| [44] | BeesonPE,DejongDN.Divergence.ContributionsinMacroeconomics,2002,2(1).
|
| [45] | BeydounMA,PopkinBP.Theimpactofsocio-economicfactorsonfunctionalstatusdeclineamongcommunitydwelling:OlderadultsinChina.SocialScience&Medicine,2005,60(9):2045-2057.同方
|
| [46] | MaZhongdong,ZhouGuowei,WangHaixian.Marketizationandhousingchoicesbycityresidents:Acaseofguangzhou.Population&Development,2010,16(2):97-107.CNKI[马忠东,周国伟,王海仙.市场化下城市居民的住房选择:以广州为例.人口与发展,2010,16(2):97-107.]万方
|
| [47] | YangYongchun,TanYiming,HuangXing,etal.HousingchoiceofurbanresidentsinChinabasedonthetransformationofculturalvalues:AcasestudyinChengdu.ActaGeographicaSinica,2012,67(6):841-852.Intheprocessoftherapidchangeandtransformationofcities,thehousingchoiceofurbanresidentsisinfluencedbytraditionalculturalvaluesandthemodernculturalformofwesterncountries,sothatthereisanewculturalvaluesystemwiththechangingoftimesandmorediversity.Basedonculturalvaluesperspective,weanalyzedthemodelandmechanismaboutsettlementsandresidentialchoiceofChineseurbanresidents,andbuilttheconceptualizationoftheoreticalmodelsaboutsettlementsandresidentialchoicefromresidentsinChineseurbanareasundertheplannedeconomicsystemaswellasinthetransitionalperiod.BytakingChengduasanexample,wehadaccesstodataofface-to-faceinterviewsandrevealedtheimpactofculturalvaluesinhousingchoiceofurbanresidentsinChina.Itisconcludedthattheculturalvaluescanaffectthemodeandresultsofurbanhousingchoiceinthefouranglesofthemacro-andmicro-viewsofthelocationchoice,educationalphilosophy,supportandmaintenance,andmarriage,andthatwiththegrowthoftheyoungerandtheageincreasingoftheolder,themodeoflivingcross-generationalhasshowedacyclicalcharacteristicofthefamilyinChina.DOI:10.11821/xb201206011原文[杨永春,谭一洺,黄辛,等.基于文化价值观的中国城市居民住房选择:以成都市为例.地理学报,2012,67(6):841-852.]在城市快速转型与变迁过程中,中国城市居民的住房选择既受限于传统文化价值观长期根深蒂固的影响,又受到西方国家现代文化思潮的不断冲击,从而确立了随时代变迁的多样化的文化价值观体系。基于文化价值观视角,分析了中国城市居民的住房选择模式和机理,初步构建了计划经济体制下和转型期中国城市居民住房选择的理论模型。进而,以成都市为例,采用大规模面对面深度访谈式调查方法获取原始数据,揭示了文化价值观对中国居民住房选择的影响。研究表明:文化价值观一般会通过宏观和微观区位选择观、教育观、抚养和赡养观、婚姻观和养老观等四大途径单独或耦合影响城市居民住房的选择方式和结果,且随着后辈的成长和长辈年龄的增长,代际居住模式呈现出一种中国特有的家庭周期性分异规律。原文
|
| [48] | YangShangguang,WangChunlan.SocialresearchonurbanresidentialspacedifferentiationinShanghai.Society,2006,26(6):117-137.[杨上广,王春兰.上海城市居住空间分异的社会学研究.社会,2006,26(6):117-137.]维普
|
| [49] | LoganJR,BianYB.IncomeinequalityinurbanChinainthe1990s.InternationalJournalofUrbanandRegionalResearch,1999(23):7-25.
|
| [50] | HuangYQ,ClarkWAV.HousingtenurechoiceintransitionalurbanChina:Amultilevelanalysis.UrbanStudies,2002,39(1):7-32.Usinga1996nationalsurveyofhousinginChinaandamultilevelmodellingtechnique,weexaminehousingtenurechoiceintransitionalurbanChinawherehouseholdshavebeengrantedlimitedfreedomofchoiceinthehousingmarketsincethehousingreformsof1988.Wefindthatbothmarketmechanismsandinstitutionalforcesaffecthouseholds'tenurechoiceinurbanChina.Whilesomesocioeconomicfactorssuchasage,householdsize,householdincomeandhousingpricehavesimilareffectsontenurechoiceasintheWest,otherssuchasthenumberofworkersandmaritalstatushaveratherdifferenteffDOI:10.1080/00420980220099041ResearchGatePDF
|
| [51] | LiSM.ThehousingmarketandtenuredecisioninChinesecities:AmultivariableanalysisofthecaseofGuangzhou.HousingStudies,2000,15(2):213-236.
|
| [52] | IzuharaM.AgeingandIntergenerationalRelations:FamilyReciprocityfromaGlobalPerspective.Bristol:ThePolicyPress,2010.
|
| [53] | KokJK,YapYN.Aginggracefully:AcomparativestudyofJapaneseandMalaysianwomenaged65-75.JournalofAgingStudies,2014,31:54-61.AbstractLongerlivesandextendedretirementhavecreateda'youngoldage'stageoflife.Howpeoplespendtheir"youngoldage"hasbecomeincreasinglyimportant.ThisresearchaimstoinvestigatethedifferentageingexperiencesofJapaneseandMalaysianwomenandtheactivitiestheyengagedintheir"youngoldage".In-depthinterviewswereconductedtocollectdataandanadaptedgroundedtheoryapproachwasusedfordataanalysis.Findingsrevealmanycommoncharacteristicsforbothgroupsofresearchparticipants.TheemergingthemesshowthatJapaneseandMalaysianChinesehavedifferentlifemissionsevidentintheirdailyactivities,onepassingoncultureandtheotherpassingonfamilyvaluesandlifeexperience.Theyalsodifferintheirchoiceoflivingarrangement(independentversusdependent/interdependent),attitudestolife(fightingversusaccepting)andactivitiesinwhichtoengage(aestheticpursuitsversusfamilyorientedactivities).DOI:10.1016/j.jaging.2014.08.007PMID:25456622ElsevierNCBI
|
| [54] | RolandA,VaraiyaP.Lifecycleconsumptionandhomeownership.JournalofEconomicTheory,1978(18):38-58.ElsevierResearchGate
|
| [55] | ZeldesSP.Optimalconsumptionwithstochasticincome:Deviationsfromcertaintyequivalence.TheQuarterlyJournalofEconomics,1989,104(2):275-298.JSTOR
|
| [56] | AngusD.Savingandliquidityconstraints.Econometrica,EconometricSociety,1991,59(5):1221-1248.
|
| [57] | SerenyM.LivingarrangementsofolderadultsinChina:theinterplayamongpreferences,realities,andhealth,ResearchonAging,2011,33(2):172-204.ResearchGat
|
| [58] | LiuYanbin.ThemodelingandempiricalresearchoffamilylifecyclemodelinChina[D].Jilin:JilinUniversity,2008:92-94.[刘艳彬.中国城市家庭生命周期模型的构建及与产品消费关系的实证研究[D].吉林:吉林大学,2008:92-94.]
|
| [59] | XuXueqiang,ZhouYixing,NingYuemin.UrbanGeography.Beijing:HigherEducationPress,1997.[许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学.北京:高等教育出版社,1997.]
|
| [60] | Carroll,CD,SamwickAA.Thenatureofprecautionarywealth.JournalofMonetaryEconomics,1997,40(1):41-71.Elsevier
|
| [61] | LiWL,LiuHY,YaoR.Housingovertimeandoverthelifecycle:Astructuralestimation.FRBofPhiladelphiaWorkingPaper,2009,9(7).Econpapers
|
| [62] | ZhenFeng,ZhaiQing,ChenGang,etal.Mobilesocialtheoryconstructionandurbangeographicresearchintheinformationera.GeographicalResearch,2012,31(2):197-206.Advancesininformationtechnologyarethecoreoftheinformationrevolution.Theinformationrevolutionhasbeentheimportantdrivingforcetopromotethecurrentnational,regionalandurbansocio-economicdevelopmentandrapidtransformation.Anditlastingandprofoundlyimpactsandchangesinherentunderstanding,whichhasformedsocio-economicandspatialstructuresincetheIndustrialRevolution.Alongwiththeaccelerationoftheconstructionofhigh-speedrailways,rapiddevelopmentofregionalcitiesandwisdomofcity'sconstruction,mobilecommunicationtechnologyismovingusintoanewmobileinformationage.Duetotimeandspaceconceptisredefined,anewspace-timeemerges,whichmakesurbangeographyafundamentalchange.Researchparadigm,methodsandcontentofurbangeographyhavebeguntochangedramatically,sotraditionaltheoreticalframeworkcannotmeettheneedsforthecurrentresearchanylonger.Thispaperanalyzestheinfluenceofmobilecommunicationstechnologyonthechangeofnetworkandgeospatialinformationspace,andproposesmobilesocialtheoryframeworkbasedonmobileinformationtechnology,thatistosay,intelligentcitiesmelttechnics,economy,society,andspace.Theconstructionofintelligentcitiescontainsfourlevels:systemlevel,technicallevel,economiclevelandsociallevel.Atthesystemlevel,itisimportanttoimprovepositiveinteractionofthegovernments,enterprises,scientificinstitutions,privateinstitutions,andmakeinstitutionalarrangement.Weshouldbuildamobilecommunitytechnologyplatformbasedonthewirelessnetwork,IOT,mobiledevicesatthetechnicallevel.Basedonthedevelopmentofmobileinformation,servicesbecomethefocusofotherindustriesattheeconomiclevel.Mobilesocialnetworkscanactivelypromotecommunicationbetweenpeopleatthesociallevel.Thenpaperexplorestheresearchmethodsofurbangeographyofthemobileinformationage,andresearchprioritiesfromurbanspaceandformtransformation,travelbehavior,urbanandregionalspatialeffecttourbanandregionalgovernance,andsoon.WewishthaturbangeographyresearchwouldbetterserveurbanandregionaldevelopDOI:10.1007/s11783-011-0280-z原文[甄峰,翟青,陈刚,等.信息时代移动社会理论构建与城市地理研究.地理研究,2012,31(2):197-206.]以信息技术进步为核心的信息革命已经成为推动国家、区域与城市社会经济发展及其快速转型的重要动力,并持久、深刻地冲击和改变着工业革命以来人类对社会经济及其空间结构形成的固有认识。当前,移动通信技术的进步及其应用,与高速铁路的加快建设、城市区域化的加速和智慧城市的建设一起,正将世界带入一个全新的移动信息时代。由于时间和空间概念的重新定义,全新时空观的出现,使得以空间问题为核心内容的城市地理学面临着根本性的变革。在移动信息技术的支撑下,城市地理学的研究范式、方法和内容都开始发生巨大的变化,传统的理论框架已逐渐不能满足当前研究的需要。本文重点分析了移动信息技术影响下的地理空间与网络信息空间的变化,提出了基于移动信息技术的移动社会理论框架。进而对移动信息时代城市地理学的研究方法、研究重点进行了探讨,希望运用城市地理学的研究更好地服务于移动信息时代的城市与区域的发展、规划与管治。DOI:10.11821/yj2012020001原文
|
| [63] | LiuWeidong,ZhenFeng.Spatialimplicationsofnewinformationandcommunicationtechnologies.ActaGeographicaSinica,2004,59(10):67-76.Recentdecadeshavewitnessedextraordinaryadvancesininformationandcommunicationtechnologies(ICTs),whichhavehelpedtochangesocialandeconomiclife.Suchchangeshavedrawnmuchattentionfromscholarsinvariousacademicfields,andhaveinitiatedferventdebatesonthespatialimplicationsofnewICTs.Geographershavebeenprominent,particularlyincontestingthepopularviewthatdistancenolongermattersandthat"theendofgeography"isathand.Withthesedebates,urbanandregionaldevelopmentundernewICTshasbecomeahotissueingeographicalstudies.Thispaper,mainlybasedonliteratureinEnglishjournals,triestoreviewandsummarizethestudiesonspatialimpactsofnewICTsatthreelevels,i.e.regionalrestructuring,urbanrestructuringandfirm-levelrestructuring.ExistingliteraturerevealsthatnewICTshaveplayedanincreasinglyimportantroleinthespatialtransformationsoftheeconomyinthelastseveraldecades,buttheyare"anenablingorfacilitatingagent".SincethereexistsagapbetweentheintroductionofnewICTsandchangesinthespatialpatternoffirms,empiricalevidenceisstillinsufficientfordrawingfirmsonnewICTimpacts.Overally,thespatialtransformationsatfirmlevelhavenotyetbeengivenenoughattentionbygeographers.原文[刘卫东,甄峰.信息化对社会经济空间组织的影响研究.地理学报,2004,59(10):67-76.]信息技术的惊人进步正在深刻地改变着社会和经济生活方式.这种变化已经引起了来自各学科的学者们的强烈关注,并引发了一场关于新的信息技术之影响的争论.伴随这些争论,全球化和信息化时代的城市与区域发展已经成为学术界的热点议题.作者主要依据西方学术文献(特别是英语学术刊物),从技术进步的一般影响、信息化时代的特征、区域空间重组、城市空间演化、企业空间组织等方面,回顾对信息技术之空间影响研究进展.现有文献表明,新的信息技术在经济空间变化中起着越来越重要的作用,但是它只是一种提供可能或促成发生的介质,并不是决定性的.所造成的空间变革是一个复杂的过程,它的趋势可以从不同的部门和不同的空间层级来观察.总体上,新的信息技术引起的企业层面空间组织变化还没有得到地理学家的足够重视.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2004.z1.010原文
|
| [64] | ZookMA.Thewebofproduction:theeconomicgeographyofcommercialInternetcontentproductionintheUnitedStates.EnvironmentandPlanningA,2000,32(3):411-426.DOI:10.1068/a32124Crossref
|
| [65] | LevesqueR.ProgrammingandDataManagementforSPSSStatistics17.02008.Phobos
|
Full-Text
|
|
Contact Us
service@oalib.com QQ:3279437679 
WhatsApp +8615387084133
|
|
