|
OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用：99美元
|
|
|
|
中国撤县（市）设区对城市经济增长的影响分析
DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201508002, PP. 1202-1214
Keywords: 撤县（市）设区,区域经济一体化,边界,增长,短期冲击,中国
Abstract:
撤县（市）设区是通过打破行政区经济,减少行政区边界,实现以地级市为基础的经济一体化的重要手段,采用政策评估的常用工具——倍差法,对中国1990-2007年的撤县（市）设区的样本进行了分析,发现撤县（市）设区对城市经济增长具有约5年的短期促进作用,主要表现在人均GDP增长率、人均固定资产投资增长率、人均消费增长率等方面,对人均道路面积和人均公共汽车数量的增长率则是先抑后扬,对相邻城市的经济增长则具有约2年的短期促进作用;并以佛山撤县（市）设区为案例,分析了短期促进作用的来源和长期激励消失的原因,认为基础设施投资是政府在撤县（市）设区后的主要行为,以此带动产业转移和房地产消费,进而促进了经济增长;但由于撤县（市）设区削弱了地方政府的发展权限,向上级政府集中了资源的控制权,使得地方长期经济发展的激励消失。
| [1] | XieDixiang,WenJi,WeiQingquan.Turningcountyintodistrictandmetropolisdevelopment.UrbanPlanningForum,2004(4):20-22.CNKI[谢涤湘,文吉,魏清泉.“撤县(市)设区”行政区划调整与城市发展.城市规划汇刊,2004(4):20-22.]近年来我国“撤县(市)设区”行政区划调整越来越多。其主要目的是促进中心城市规模,理顺中心城市与周边县市之间的关系。然而,调整也带来了许多消极影响。文章认为,提高城市的竞争力,推动相邻城市间的协调发展,关键还是要从法制层面上创新,要改革我国城市的设置办法,形成新的管治模式,建立科学、合理的城市协调发展机制,加强区域规划的编制和实施。DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3363.2004.04.005CNKIPDF
|
| [2] | LuoZhendong.China'sadministrativeregiondivisionreformandmechanism.CityPlanningReview,2005,29(8):29-35.CNKI[罗震东.中国当前的行政区划改革及其机制.城市规划,2005,29(8):29-35.]分权化改革推动了中国地方行政区划的变革,撤县(市)设区与扩权强县成为当前中国行政区划实践的两个主要方向。在分析这两种实践方向的特征与理论依据的基础上,对其在中国当前政治经济背景下的演化机制进行了深入探究。DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1002-1329.2005.08.003CNKI
|
| [3] | ChenMeiwu,ZhangJingxiang,ZhaoWei.OntheinternalconformityofurbanareasinChinainthecontextofadjustmentofadministrativedivision:WithHangzhouasanexample.Planners,2005(5):100-103.CNKI[陈眉舞,张京祥,赵伟.区划调整背景下的都市区内部整合研究:以杭州为例.规划师,2005(5):100-103.]CNKI
|
| [4] | Baldwin,RchiapporiPA,VenablesA.Thegrowtheffectsof1992.EconomicPolicy,1989,4(9):247-281.
|
| [5] | BarroR,Sala-i-MartinX.EconomicGrowth.NewYork:McGraw-Hill,1995.NII
|
| [6] | Henrekson,MtorstenssonJ,TorstenssonR.GrowtheffectsofEuropeanintegration.EuropeanEconomicReview,1997,41(8):1537-1557.ThispaperdealswiththeeffectsofEuropeanintegrationintheECandEFTAoneconomicgrowth.BaseregressionssuggestthatECandEFTAmembershipsdoinfacthaveapositiveandsignificanteffectoneconomicgrowth,andthatthereisnosignificantdifferencebetweenECandEFTAmembership.Thisresultisnotcompletelyrobustwithrespecttochangesinthesetofcontrolvariablesandtomeasurementerrors.Nonetheless,theresultssuggestthatregionalintegrationmaynotonlyaffectresourceallocation,butalsolong-rungrowthrates.ThisconclusionisstrengthenedbythefactthatweobtainsimilarresultswhenweusepaneldataforasampleofOECDcountries.AnumberoftestsarealsoconductedtoascertainthattheEC/EFTAvariableisnotprimarilyaproxyfortheeffectofeconomicdevelopment.Inaddition,weexplorepossibleindirecteffectsofregionalintegration.Elsevier
|
| [7] | LiuJunde,ShuQing.AnewperspectiveofChineseregionaleconomy:Theadministrativeareaeconomy.Reformation&Strategy,1996(5):1-4.[刘君德,舒庆.中国区域经济的新视角:行政区经济改革与战略,1996(5):1-4.]维普
|
| [8] | McCallum.Nationalbordersmatter:Canada-USregionaltradepatterns.AmericanEconomicReview,1995,85(3):615-623.Citeseer
|
| [9] | Head,Mayer.Non-Europe:ThemagnitudeandcausesofmarketfragmentationintheEU.weltwirtschaftlichesArchiv,2000,6(2):284-314.In1985theEuropeanCommissiondiagnoseditsmemberstatesassufferingfromexcessivemarketfragmentation,astateofaffairsitlaterreferredtoas"Non-Europe".Inresponse,theEuropeanUnionlaunchedanambitiousprogramtounifyitsinternalmarketbyremovingnon-tariffbarriers.WeexaminetheempiricalbasisfortheCommission'sdiagnosisusingatrademodelderivedfrommonopolisticcompetition.WetheninvestigatethelinksbetweentheinitialsizeandsubsequentevolutionofbordereffectswithintheEuropeanUnion.OurfindingssupporttheviewthatEuropeanconsumersactasifimportsfromothermembersweresubjecttohighnon-tariffbarriers.However,thereappearstobealmostnorelationbetweenmarketfragmentationandthebarriersthatwereidentifiedandremovedbyEurope'sSingleMarketProgramme.DOI:10.1007/BF02707689conPapers
|
| [10] | LiXun,XuXianxiang.Onthetemporo-spatialvariationsofthebordereffects:Approachandempirics.GeographicalResearch,2006,25(5):792-802.原文[李郇,徐现祥.边界效应的测定方法及其在长江三角洲的应用.地理研究,2006,25(5):792-802.]采用Barro回归方程结合重力模型,构建了区域经济一体化进程中对行政区边界效应的度量方法,并以长江三角洲地区为例,对20世纪90年代江苏与浙江、上海与江苏、上海与浙江的边界效应进行了实证分析.通过邹检验发现,长江三角洲各城市间的经济水平存在结构性的差异,进一步的回归检验结果表明,长江三角洲各城市间存在一体化的趋势,但存在着边界效应;从变动态势上看,上海与江苏的边界效应越来越小,上海与浙江的边界效应存在增加的趋势,同时,江苏与浙江的边界在区域一体化的影响减少.最后,从自然条件、历史发展、行政区经济、发展模式和制度安排等方面分析了边界效应及演变的原因.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2006.05.005原文
|
| [11] | QianY,WeingastR.China'stransitiontomarkets:Marketpreservingfederalism,Chinesestyle.PolicyReform,1996(1):149-185.Tand
|
| [12] | Young.Therazor'sedge:DistributionsandincrementalreforminthePeople'sRepublicChina.QuarterlyJournalofEconomics,2000,115:1091-1136.
|
| [13] | HongYinxing,LiuZhibiao.ThemodelandmechanismofregionaleconomicdevelopmentintheYangtzeRiverDelta.Beijing:TsinghuaUniversityPress,2003.[洪银兴,刘志彪.长江三角洲地区经济发展的模式和机制.北京:清华大学出版社,2003.]经过20余年的发展，长江三角洲地区（江苏、浙江与上海）成为中国经济最为活跃的区域之一。本书研究了长江三角洲地区的竞争与合作、产业分工和竞争力、上市公司、城市化以及外资企业的投资战略等一系列重大问题，突出了对长江三角洲地区经济发展的模式和机制的描述与分析，得出了一系列重要的结论，这对于该区域经济的进一步发展乃至对于整个中国经济的发展都具有重要的意义。北大图书馆馆藏系统豆瓣读书
|
| [14] | PingXinqiao.Theincentivesandeffectsofgovernmentprotection.Finance&TradeEconomics,2004(5):3-10.BasedonanationalsurveyaboutenterprisesinChina(2002),weshowempiricallythattherearestrongmate-rialincentivesbehindthegovernment'sprotectionsandcontrols:whereverthemarginalproductivityofproduc-tivefactorishigher.Thereexistincentivesforthegovernmenttoprotectandcontroltheindustries.Theeffectsofgovernmentprotectiononfactormarketallocationaresignificantlynegative.However,fortheincumbentstate-owned-enterprises,therearesomebenefitsgainedfromlocalgovernmentprotections.CNKI[平新乔.政府保护的动机与效果:一个实证分析.财贸经济,2004(5):3-10.]CNKI
|
| [15] | LinYifu,LiuPeilin.Localprotectionismandmarketsegmentation:InvestigatedfromtheviewpointofthedevelopmentStrategy.WorkingPaperfromChinaCenterforEconomicResearch,2004,No.C2004015.[林毅夫,刘培林.地方保护和市场分割:从发展战略的角度考察.北京大学中国经济研究中心内部讨论稿,2004,No.C2004015.]Cenet
|
| [16] | LuYong.AdministrativeRegionalEconomy.Beijing:People'sPublishingHouse,2002.[鲁勇.行政区域经济.北京:人民出版社,2002.]
|
| [17] | SandraP.Chinamarketismovingtowards"Nonintegration"?Chinesecomparativeanalysisofdomesticandinternationalmarketintegrationdegree.WorldEconomicPapers,2002(1):3-17.[SandraP.中国市场正在走向“非一体化”?中国国内和国际市场一体化程度的比较分析.世界经济文汇,2002(1):3-17.]同方
|
| [18] | SuYuan,XuXianxiang.ThespecificationofChina'seconomicgrowthmodel:1952-1998.EconomicResearchJournal,2002(11):3-11.CNKI[舒元,徐现祥.中国经济增长模型的设定:1952-1998.经济研究,2002(11):3-11.]CNKI
|
| [19] | YehAnthonyGar-on,LiXia.Economicdevelopment,urbansprawl,andagriculturallandlossinthePearlRiverDelta,China.EconomicGeography,1999,19(1):67-71.ThePearlRiverDeltaisdevelopingveryrapidlyinthetwodecades.Concomitanttothisdevelopmentisthelossofvaluableagriculturallandbytheencroachmentofurbandevelopment,especiallybymassiveconstructionsitesfromlandspeculation.Thispaperexaminestherelationshipbetweeneconomicdevelopment,urbansprawl,andagriculturallandlossinthePearlRiverDelta,UsingDongguan,anewlyestablishedcitythatwasupgradedfromaruralcountytown,asacasestudy.ItisfoundagriculturallandlossandurbansprawlismuchrelatedtothestagesofeconomicdevelopmentinthePearlRiverDelta.Agriculturallandlossandurbansprwlaremostseriousintheperiodoflandspeculationin1990-1993asaresultofthepropertyboominthePearlRiverDeltathatwasinducedbythepropertyboominHongKong.UrbansprawlinthePearlRiverDeltaismuchrelatedtoruralindustrialization,riseoflocalism,influencefromHongKong,roaddevelopment,andlackoflandmanagementandmonitoringsystem.Thereisanurgentneedtodevelopasustainablelanddevelopmentstrategytoprotectfurtherlossofvaluableagriculturallandandenvironmentaldegradation.AbetterdevelopmentcontrolprocessandplanningwithasustainabledevelopmentobjectivemayneedtobeformulatedinthepearlRiverDelta.Ahigherdevelopmentintensitymayalsobeneededtominimizelandconsumption.TheformsofurbandevelopmentandproblemsofagriculturallandlossthatarepresentedinDongguaninnotuniqueinChina.TheyareverycommonlyfoundinthecitiesofChina,especiallythosenewlyestablichedcitieswhichusedtoberuralcountytowns.IfwecanfindasolutionforDongguan,weshouldbeabletoapplyittoothercities,makingcitiesofChinatobemoresustainable.珠江三角洲自改革開放的２０年來經歷了巨大的發展，但也導致了城市的迅速擴張以及大量寶貴農田的流失。本文以珠江三角洲發展最快的城市之一的東莞為例探討其經濟發展、城市擴張以及農田流失的關系。研究發現了農田流失與不同階段的經濟發展有密切的關系。自進入９０年代以來，由于房地產的過熱發展，造成了農田的加速流失，嚴重浪費土地資源。珠江三角洲的農田流失與鄉鎮企業的發展，地方自主權的擴大，香港的影響，交通條件的改善以及土地管理等一系列因素有關。ub.hku.hk[叶嘉安,黎夏.珠江三角洲经济发展、城市扩展与农田流失研究:以东莞为例.经济地理,1999,19(1):67-71.]CNKI
|
| [20] | YangQijing,NieHuihua.Market-preservingfederalismandcriticismonit.EconomicResearchJournal,2008(3):99-114.ThepaperoutlinestheframeworkandcontributionsofMPF(Market-preservingFederalism).However,itfocusesonthedefectsofMPF,whichbasesonneoclassicaltheoryofcompetitionandclassicalagenttheory,andsimplylooksgovernmentorganizationasafirm.Asaresult,MPFisinlackofmicropoliticalfoundation;Itcannotdeeplyandcomprehensivelyindicatesthespecialroleofthecentralgovernmentinpoliticsandeconomy;itlooksoverthenecessaryconditionsthatmakedecentralizationefficient;itisverydifficulttoanalyzethenegativeeffectsofdecentralizationandinter-jurisdictioncompetition;Moreover,itcannotexploretheoptimaldecentralization,hierarchies,orpathofdecentralization.Therefore,MPFisfarfromansweringwhatinstitutionsmotivatepoliticianstopreservemarket.Finally,weputforwardsomewaystoimprovetheresearchontheinteractionofthegovernmentorganizationandeconomy.CNKI[杨其静,聂辉华.保护市场的联邦主义及其批判:基于文献的一个思考.经济研究,2008(3):99-114.]本文首先梳理了保护市场的联邦主义(MPF)的分析框架及其贡献.但本文的重点在于系统地批判MPF理论框架的缺陷根源于其借助的新古典经济学的竞争理论和经典代理理论,且简单地将政府组织类比为企业.这就导致MPF缺乏地方政府关于制度供给的政治微观基础;PDF
|
| [21] | MeyerBD.Naturalandquasi-experimentsineconomics.JournalofBusiness&EconomicStatistics,1995,13(2):151-161.Econpaper
|
| [22] | ZhouLi'an,ChenYe.Thepolicyeffectoftax-and-feesreformsinruralChina:Adifference-in-differencesestimation.EconomicResearchJournal,2005(8):44-53.UsingalargedatasetcontainingChina's591countiesandcounty-levelcitiesfrom1999-2002,thisstudyconductsasystematicandrigorousempiricalanalysisofthecausaleffectsofChina'sruraltax-and-feesreformsontheincomegrowthofthefarmers.Weemployadifference-in-differences(DID)estimationmethod,takingadvantageofthefactthatthereformswerespreadgraduallyfromsomeregionstootherones.Wefindthattheeffectofthereformsonthegrowthrateoffarmers'incomeisstatisticallyandeconomicallysignificant,whichcontributestomorethan40percentofthefarmers'annualincomegrowthinthesampleperiodandthatsuchpositiveeffecthaslastedmorethanoneyear.Thesebasicresultsarerobusttoanumberofspecificationtests.Someimportantfactorsaffectingthereformeffectsarealsoexamined.CNKI[周黎安,陈烨.中国农村税费改革的政策效果:基于双重差分模型的估计.经济研究,2005(8):44-53.]CNKI
|
| [23] | ShiYupeng,ZhouLi'an.Regionaldecentralizationandeconomicefficiency:Evidencefromseparate-planningcitiesinChina.EconomicResearchJournal,2007(1):17-28.CNKI[史宇鹏,周黎安.地区放权与经济效率:以计划单列为例.经济研究,2007(1):17-28.]CNKI
|
| [24] | XuXianxiang,WangXianbin,ShuYuan.Localofficialsandeconomicgrowth.EconomicResearchJournal,2007(9):18-31.It'stherepeatedlyobservedphenomenonthatthelocalofficialsplayanactiveroleintheprocessofeconomicdevelopmentinChina.Theliterature,however,hasbeenindark,becauseit'snoteasytoseparatetheimpactoflocalofficialsoneconomicgrowthfromthefixedeffect.Wefindtheofficialtransfercanserveasthenaturalexperimenttosolvetheproblemoftheseparation.Soweconstructthegovernor-provincematcheddatasetinwhichpeoplecantracebackatleasttwoprovincesthesamegovernorservedin,andthensystematicallyexplorethedirecteffectofgovernorontheprovincialeconomicgrowth,whichwecalltheeffectofgovernortransfer.Thegovernordoesmatterforprovincialeconomicgrowth.Specifically,it'sabout1percentageofeconomicgrowththatcandirectlyandsignificantlyattributetotheincumbentgovernors,whichtoourknowledgeisthefirstattempttounderstandtheeconomicgrowthrigorouslyattheindividuallevel.CNKI[徐现祥,王贤彬,舒元.地方官员与经济增长——来自中国省长、省委书记交流的证据.经济研究,2007(9):18-31.]通常认为地方官员在我国经济发展中扮演着积极角色，近来国家也有意通过干部交流促进省区平衡发展，但国内还没有定量识别地方官员影响经济增长的文献。本文基于1978--2005年间省长（书记）交流样本构造了省长（书记）与省区相匹配的面板数据，系统地实证分析省长（书记）交流对流入省区经济增长的影响（即省长交流效应），结果发现，整体而言，省长交流能够使流入地的经济增长速度提高1个百分点左右；这种省长交流效应是通过在流入地采取大力发展二产、重视一产、忽视三产的产业发展取向实现的。本文的发现是稳健的，有助于增进对加强干部交流破解省区发展不平衡的理解。CNKI
|
| [25] | XuXianxiang,LiXun.ConvergenceinChinesecities.EconomicResearchJournal,2004(5):40-48.CNKI[徐现祥,李郇.中国城市经济增长的趋同分析.经济研究,2004(5):40-48.]Lucas(1988，2002)一直强调城市具有不同于国家、省区层面上的经济增长特性，但为现有的有关文献所忽视。本文采用趋同分析的标准方法，就我国216个地级及其以上城市展开讨论，结果发现，与我国省区趋同模式不同，我国城市经济增长存在δ趋同和绝对β趋同；从趋同机制上看，我国城市层面上同时存在新古典增长理论和新增长理论所强调的趋同机制。本文的发现是稳健的，且有助于对我国地区差距的进一步理解。CNKIPDF
|
| [26] | LiRuilin,LuoHuasong.Regionaleconomicintegration:Connotation,effectandthewayofrealization.InquiryintoEconomicIssues,2007(1):52-57.[李瑞林,骆华松.区域经济一体化:内涵、效应与实现途径.经济问题探索,2007(1):52-57.]CNKI
|
| [27] | ZhangJingxiang;WuFulong.Frommergerofadministrativeregiontoregionalgovernance:CasestudyofYangtzeRiverDelta.CityPlanningReview,2004(5):25-30.CNKI[张京祥,吴缚龙.从行政区兼并到区域管治:长江三角洲的实证与思考.城市规划,2004(5):25-30.]万方
|
| [28] | HongShijian.Metropolitangovernance:Theoreticaldevelopmentandoperationmode[D].Nanjing:SoutheastUniversityPress,2009.[洪世键.大都市区治理:理论演进与运作模式[D].南京:东南大学出版社,2009.]
|
Full-Text
|
|
Contact Us
service@oalib.com QQ:3279437679 
WhatsApp +8615387084133
|
|
