1 Stanhill G, Cohen S. Global dimming: A review of the evidence for a widespread and significant reduction in global radiation withdiscussion of its probable causes and possible agricultural consequences. Agric For Meteorol, 2001, 107: 255—278？？
[2]
2 Knohl A, Baldocchi D D. Effects of diffuse radiation on canopy gas exchange processes in a forest ecosystem. J Geophys Res, 2008, 113:G02023
[3]
3 Qian Y, Kaiser D P, Ruby L L, et al. More frequent cloud-free sky and less surface solar radiation in China from 1955 to 2000. Geophys ResLett, 2006, 33: L01812
[4]
4 Wang K C, Dickinson R E, Liang S L. Clear sky visibility has decreased over land globally from 1973 to 2007. Science, 2009, 323: 1468—1470？？
[5]
5 Chameides W L, Yu H, Liu S C, et al. Case study of the effects of atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: an opportunity toenhance crop yields in China through emission controls? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1999, 96: 13626—13633
[6]
6 Gu L H, Baldocchi D D, Wofsy S C, et al. Response of a deciduous forest to the mount Pinatubo eruption: Enhanced photosynthesis.Science, 2003, 299: 2035—2038？？
[7]
7 Farquhar G D, Roderick M L. Pinatubo, diffuse light, and the carbon cycle. Science, 2003, 299: 1997—1998？？
[8]
8 Mercado L M, Bellouin N, Sitch S, et al. Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink. Nature, 2009, 458: 1014—1017？？
[9]
9 Still C J, Riley W J, Biraud S C, et al. Influence of clouds and diffuse radiation on ecosystem-atmosphere CO2 and CO18O exchanges. JGeophys Res, 2009, 114: G01018
[10]
10 Long S P, Zhu X G, Naidu S L, et al. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ, 2006, 29: 315—330
[11]
11 Werner C, Ryel R J, Correia O, et al. Effects of photoinhibition on whole-plant carbon gain assessed with a photosynthesis model. Plant CellEnviron, 2001, 24: 27—40
[12]
12 Alton P B, North P R. Interpreting shallow, vertical nitrogen profiles in tree crowns: A three-dimensional, radiative-transfer simulationaccounting for diffuse sunlight. Agric For Meteorol, 2007, 145: 110—124？？
[13]
13 Zhu X G, Ort D R, Whitmarsh J, et al. The slow reversibility of photosystem II thermal energy dissipation on transfer from high to low lightmay cause large losses in carbon gain by crop canopies: A theoretical analysis. J Exp Bot, 2004, 55: 1167—1175？？
[14]
14 Alton P B, Ellis R, Los S O, et al. Improved global simulations of gross primary product based on a separate and explicit treatment ofdiffuse and direct sunlight. J Geophys Res, 2007, 112: D07203
[15]
15 郭焱, 李保国. 虚拟植物的研究进展. 科学通报, 2001, 46: 273—280
[16]
16 Wang X P, Guo Y, Li B G, et al. Evaluating a three dimensional model of diffuse photosynthetically active radiation in maize canopies. Int JBiometeorol, 2006, 50: 349—357？？
[17]
17 Grant R F, Peters D B, Larson E M, et al. Simulation of canopy photosynthesis in maize and soybean. Agric For Meteorol, 1989, 48: 75—92？？
[18]
18 Host G E, Stech H W, Lenz K E, et al. Forest patch modeling: Using high performance computing to simulate aboveground interactionsamong individual trees. Funct Plant Biol, 2008, 35: 976—987？？
[19]
19 Cheng S H, Cao L Y, Zhuang J Y, et al. Super hybrid rice breeding in China: Achievements and prospects. J Integr Plant Biol, 2007, 49:805—810？？
22 Myneni R B, Ross J, Asrar G. A review on the theory of photon transport in leaf canopies. Agric For Meteorol, 1989, 45: 1—153？？
[23]
23 Zheng B Y, Shi L J, Ma Y T, et al. Comparison of architecture among different cultivars of hybrid rice using a spatial light model based on3-D digitising. Funct Plant Biol, 2008, 35: 900—910？？
[24]
24 Dauzat J, Rapidel B, Berger A. Simulation of leaf transpiration and sap flow in virtual plants: Model description and application to a coffeeplantation in Costa Rica. Agric For Meteorol, 2001, 109: 143—160？？
[25]
25 Pearcy R W, Yang W M. A three-dimensional crown architecture model for assessment of light capture and carbon gain by understoryplants. Oecologia, 1996, 108: 1—12？？
27 Falster D S, Westoby M. Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: What consequences for light interception? New Phytol, 2003, 158:509—525
[28]
28 Campbell G S, Norman J M. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Pullman: Springer, 1998
[29]
29 Alton P B. Reduced carbon sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems under overcast skies compared to clear skies. Agric For Meteorol, 2008,148: 1641—1653？？
32 Peng S B, Khush G S, Virk P, et al. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential. Field Crops Res, 2008, 108: 32—38？？
[33]
33 Healey K D, Rickert K G, Hammer G L, et al. Radiation use efficiency increases when the diffuse component of incident radiation isenhanced under shade. Aust J Agric Res, 1998, 49: 665—672？？
[34]
34 Roderick M, Farquhar G D, Berry S, et al. On the direct effect of clouds and atmospheric particles on the productivity and structure ofvegetation. Oecologia, 2001, 129: 21—30？？
[35]
35 Alton P B, North P R, Los S O. The impact of diffuse sunlight on canopy light-use efficiency, gross photosynthetic product and netecosystem exchange in three forest biomes. Glob Chang Biol, 2007, 13: 776—787？？
[36]
36 Niyogi D, Chang H, Saxena V K, et al. Direct observations of the effects of aerosol loading on net ecosystem CO2 exchanges over differentlandscapes. Geophys Res Lett, 2004, 31: L20506？？
[37]
37 Cabrera F J, Baille A, López J C, et al. Effects of cover diffusive properties on the components of greenhouse solar radiation. Biosyst Eng,2009, 103: 344—356？？
[38]
38 Adams S R, Valdés V M, Hamer P J C, et al. Spatial variation and comparison of yields of tomatoes grown in small experimentalcompartments with those in large commercial units. Acta Hortic, 2000, 534: 93—100
[39]
39 Raveh E, Cohen S, Raz T, et al. Increased growth of young citrus trees under reduced radiation load in a semi-arid climate. J Exp Bot, 2003,54: 365—373？？
