8 Hacker B R, Simon M P, Geoffrey A A, et al. Subduction factory: 2. Are intermediate-depth earthquakes in subducting slabs linked to metamorphic dehydration reactions? J Geophys Res, 2003, 108(B1), doi: 101029/2001JB001129
[9]
9 Peacock D C. Scaling of transfer zones in the British Isles. J Struct Geol, 2003, 25: 1561-1567
15 Teng J W, Wei S Y, Sun K Z, et al. The characteristics of the seismic activity in the Qinghai-Xizang (Tibet) Plateau of China. Tectonophysics, 1987, 134: 129-144
18 Chatelain J L, Roecker S W, Hatzfeld D, et al. Microearthquake seismicity and fault plane solutions in the HinduKush region and their tectonic implications. J Geophys Res, 1980, 85: 1365-1387
27 Lacombe O, Mouthereau F, Angelier J, et al. Structural, geodetic and seismological evidence for tectonic escape in SW Taiwan. Tectonophysics, 2001, 333: 323-345
[28]
28 Wu Y M, Chang C H, Zhao L, et al. A comprehensive relocation of earthquakes in Taiwan from 1991 to 2005. Bull Seismol Soc Amer, 2008, 98: 1471-1481
34 Oreshin S, Kiselev S, Vinnik L, et al. Crust and mantle beneath western Himalaya, Ladakh and western Tibet from integrated seismic data. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2008, 271: 75-87
[35]
35 Negredo A M, Replumaz A, Villase？or A, et al. Modeling the evolution of continental subduction processes in the Pamir Hindu Kush region. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2007, 259: 212-225
[36]
36 Li C, Hilst van der R D, Meltzer A S, et al. Subduction of the Indian lithosphere beneath the Tibetan plateau and Burma. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2008, 274: 157-168
[37]
37 Hilst van der R D, Widiyantoro S, Engdahl E R. Evidence for deep mantle circulation from global tomography. Nature, 1997, 386: 578-584
[38]
38 Huang J, Zhao D. High-resolution mantle tomography of China and surrounding regions. J Geophys Res, 2006, 111: B09305, doi: 10.1029/2005JB004066
[39]
39 Zhao D P. Seismic images under 60 hotspots: Search for mantle plumes. Gondwana Res, 2007, 12: 335-355
[40]
40 Miller M S, Kennett B L N. Evolution of mantle structure beneath the northwest Pacific evidence from seismic tomography and paleogeographic reconstructions. Tectonics, 2006, 25: TC4002, doi: 10.1029/2005TC001909
[41]
41 Kim K H, Chiu J M, Pujol J, et al. Three-dimensional VP and VS structural models associated with the active subduction and collision tectonics in the Taiwan region. Geophys J Int, 2005, 162: 204-220, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02657.x
[42]
42 Lallemand S, Font Y, Bijwaard H, et al. New insights on 3-D plates interaction near Taiwan from tomography and tectonic implications. Tectonophysics, 2001, 335: 229-253
44 Sahu V K, Gahalaut V K, Rajput S, et al. Crustal deformation in the Indo-Burmese arc region: Implications from the Myanmar and Southeast Asia GPS measurements. Curr Sci, 2006, 90: 1688-1693
[45]
45 赵文津, Nelson K D. 印度板块俯冲到藏南之下的深反射证据. 地球学报, 1996, 17: 131-137
[46]
46 Zhao W, Nelson K D, The Project INDEPTH Team. Deep seismic-reflection evidence for continental underthrusting beneath Southern Tibet. Nature, 1993, 366: 557-559
[47]
47 Kosarev G, Kind R, Sobolev S V, et al. Seismic evidence for a detached Indian lithospheric mantle beneath Tibet. Science, 1999, 283: 1306-1309
[48]
48 Olsen K B, Stephenson W J, Geisselmeyer A. 3D crustal structure and long-period ground motions from a M9.0 megathrust earthquake in the Pacific Northwest region. J Seismol, 2008, 12: 145-159, doi: 10.1007/s10950-007-9082-y
50 Manning C E. The chemistry of subduction-zone fluids. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2004, 223: 1-16
[51]
51 Holt W E, Ni J F, Wallace T C, et al. The active tectonics of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis and surrounding regions. J Geophys Res, 1991, 96: 14595-14632
53 Santo T. On the characteristic seismicity in south Asia from Hindukush to Burma. Bull Inter Inst Seism Earth Eng, 1969, 6: 81-93
[54]
54 Fitch T J. Earthquake mechanisms in the Himalayan, Burmese, and Andaman regions and continental tectonics in Central Asia. J Geophys Res, 1970, 75: 2699-2709
[55]
55 Chandra U. Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms and tectonics of Burma, 20°-28°N. Geophys J Roy Astrono Soc, 1975, 40: 367-381
[56]
56 Chandra U. Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms and tectonics along the Himalayan mountain range and vicinity. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 1978, 16: 109-131
[57]
57 Verma R K, Mukhopadhyay M, Ahluwalia M S. Seismicity, gravity and tectonics of northeast India and northern Burma. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 1976, 66: 1683-1694
[58]
58 Verma R K, Mukhopadhyay M, Nag A K. Seismicity and tectonics in south China and Burma. Tectonophysics, 1980, 64: 85-96
60 Steckler M S, Akhter S H, Seeber L. Collision of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta with the Burma Arc: Implications for earthquake hazard. Earth Planet Sci Lett, 2008, 273: 367-378
[61]
61 Khan P K. Variation in dip-angle of the Indian plate subducting beneath the Burma plate and its tectonic implications. Geosciences J, 2005, 9: 227-234
[62]
62 Rangin C, Spakman W, Pubellier M, et al. Tomographic and geological constraints on subduction along the eastern Sundaland continental margin (South-East Asia). Bull Geol Soc France, 1999, 170: 775-788
65 Angelier J, Baruah S. Seismotectonics in Northeast India: A stress analysis of focal mechanism solutions of earthquakes and its kinematic implications. Geophys J Int 2009, 178: 303-326, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04107.x
[66]
66 Engdahl E R, Hilst van der R D, Buland R. Global teleseismic earthquake relocationwith improved travel times and procedures for depth determination. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1998, 88: 722-743
[67]
67 Engdahl E R, Villasefior A. Global Seismicity: 1900-1999. In: Lee W H K, Kanamori H, Jennings P C, eds. International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. San Diego: Academic Press, 2002. 665-690
[68]
68 Hayes G P, Wald D J. Developing framework to constrain the geometry of the seismic rupture plane on subduction interfaces a priori--A probabilistic approach. Geophys J Int, 2009, 176: 951-964, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.04035.x
[69]
69 Hayes G P, Wald D J, Keranen K. Advancing techniques to constrain the geometry of the seismic rupture plane on the subduction interfaces a priori: Higher-order functional fits. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 2010, 10, doi: 10.1029/2009GC002633
[70]
70 Hayes G P, Wald D J, Johnson R L. Slab1.0: A three-dimensional model of global subduction zone geometries. J Geophys Res, 2012, 117: B01302, doi: 10.1029/2011JB008524
72 Wells D L, Coppersmith K L. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seism Soc Am, 1994, 84: 974-1002
[73]
73 Bilham R, Gaur V K, Molnar P. Himalayan seismic harzard. Science, 2001, 293: 1442-1444
[74]
74 Bird P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem Geophys Geosyst, 2003, 4: 1027, doi: 10.1029/2001GC00252
76 Meade B J. Present-day kinematics at the India-Asia collision zone. Geology, 2007, 35: 81-84, doi: 10.1130/G22924A.1
[77]
77 Liu Z, Bird P. Kinematic modeling of neotectonics in the Persia-Tibet-Burma orogen. Geophys J Int, 2008, 172: 779-797
[78]
78 Copley A, McKenzie D. Models of crustal flow in the India-Asia collision zone. Geophys J Int, 2007, 169: 683-698
[79]
79 Copley A. Kinematics and dynamics of the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. Geophys J Int, 2008, 174: 1081-1100
[80]
80 Maurin T, Rangin C. Structure and kinematics of the Indo-Burmese Wedge: Recent and fast growth of the outer wedge. Tectonics, 2009, 28: TC2010, doi: 10.1029/2008TC002276
