15 Servos M R. Review of the aquatic toxicity, estrogenic responses and bioaccumulation of alkylphenols and alkylphenol polyethoxylates. Wa Qual Res J Can, 1999, 34: 123–177
[5]
16 Sonnenschein C, Soto A M. An updated review of environmental estrogen and androgen mimics and antagonists. J Steroid Biochem Molec Biol, 1998, 65: 143–150？？
[6]
17 Sumpter J P. Xenoendocrine disrupters-environmental impacts. Toxicol Lett, 1998, 102–103: 337–342？？
3 Sota A M, Justicia H, Wary J W. Pnonylphenol: An es-trogeniexenobiotie released from Iniodified Polystyrene. Environ Hea1th Perspect, 1991, 92: 167–173？？
[9]
4 Hutchinson T H, Ankley G T, Segner H, et al. Screening and testing for endocrine disruption in fish-biomarkers as signposts not traffic lights in risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect, 2006, 114(Suppl): 106–114
6 Stephan C E, Mount D I, Hansen D J, et al. Guideline for deriving numerical national water quality criteria for the protection of aquatic organism and their uses. Springfield: National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 1985. 22–55
9 Wu F C, Meng W, Zhao X L, et al. China embarking on development of its own national water quality criteria system. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 7792–7793
[15]
10 US EPA. Aquatic life ambient water quality criteria–nonylphenol, Final. Office of Water 4304T, EPA-822-R-05-005. December 2005. http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/aqlife.html
[16]
11 Caldwell D J, Mastrocco F, Hutchinson T H, et al. Derivation of an aquatic predicted no-effect concentration for the synthetic hormone, 17α-ethinylestradiol. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 7046–7054
19 Klimisch J, Andreae M, Tillmann U. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharm, 1997, 25: 1–5？？
21 Balk F, Okkerman P C, Dogger J W. Guidance document for aquatic effects assessment. Paris: Environment Directorate of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1995. 22–28
23 De Laender F, De Schamphelaere K A C, Vanrolleghem P A, et al. Do we have to incorporate ecological interactions in the sensitivity assessment of ecosystems? An examination of a theoretical assumption underlying species sensitivity distribution models. Environ Int, 2008, 34: 390–396？？
[25]
24 Scheringer M, Steinbach D, Escher B, et al. Probabilistic approaches in the effect assessment of toxic chemicals what are the benefits and limitations? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2002, 9: 307–314
[26]
25 Newman M C, Ownby D R, Mézin L C A, et al. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2000, 19: 508–515
[27]
26 Aldenberg T, Slob W. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 1993, 25: 48–63？？
[28]
27 Wheeler J R, Grist E P M, Leung K M Y, et al. Species sensitivity distributions: Data and model choice. Mar Pollut Bull, 2002, 45: 192–202？？
[29]
28 European Commission. Final report on the ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Adopted by the scientific steering committee at its meeting of 6–7 March, 2003. 1–54
[30]
29 Currie J, Mc Sweeney B. 4-nonylphnenol (branched) and nonylphenol. Oxfordshire: European Union Risk Assessment Repoa, European Union Risk Report Assessment Report, 2001. 4–5
[31]
30 K?llqvist T. Environmental risk assessment of artificial turf systems. Serial No. 5111–2005, report, 19, 12, 2005. 1–20
[32]
31 Von der Ohe P C, Valeria D, Jaroslav S, et al. A new risk assessment approach for the prioritization of 500 classical and emerging organic microcontaminants as potential river basin specific pollutants under the European Water Framework Directive. Sci Total Environ, 2011, 409: 2064–2077？？
