2 Maltby L, Blake N, Brock T C M, et al. Insecticide species sensitivity distribution: Importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2005, 24: 379–388？？
[3]
3 Wu F C, Meng W, Zhao X L, et al. China embarking on development of its own national water quality criteria system. Environ Sci Technol, 2010, 44: 7792–7793
6 US EPA. Great Lakes Water Quality Initiative Criteria Documents for the Protection of Wildlife. Technical Report, EPA/820/B-95/008. Washington DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, 1995
[7]
7 US EPA. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Technical Report. Washington DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, 2009
11 Marsh M C. The effect of some industrial wastes on fishes. Water Supply and Irrigation Paper. US Geological Survey, 1907, (192): 337–348
[12]
12 Shelford V E. An experimental study of the effects of gas wastes upon fishes, with especial references to stream pollution. Bull Ill State Lab Nat His, 1917, 11: 381–412
[13]
13 Ellis M M. Detection and measurement of stream pollution. Bull Bureau Fish, 1937, 48: 365–437
[14]
14 California State Water Pollution Control Board. Water Quality Criteria. Technical Report. Sacramento: California State Water Pollution Control Board, 1952
[15]
15 US Department of the Interior. Report of the subcommittee or water quality criteria. Technical Report. Washington DC: US Department of the Interior, 1968
[16]
17 US EPA. Quality Criteria for Water. Technical Report. Washington DC: Office of Water Regulations and Standards, 1976
[17]
18 US EPA. Ambient Water Quality Criteria (series). Technical Report. Washington DC: US EPA, 1980
[18]
19 Stephan C E, Mount D I, Hansen D J, et al. Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses. Technical Report. Washington DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1985
[19]
20 US EPA. Quality Criteria for Water. Technical Report. Washington DC: Office of Water Regulations and Standards, 1986
[20]
21 US EPA. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria-correction. Technical Report. Washington DC: Office of Water Office of Science and Technology, 1999
[21]
22 CCME. Protocol for the Derivation of Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Technical Report. Winnipeg: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1999
[22]
23 US EPA. Methodology for Deriving Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health. Technical Report, EPA-822-B-00-004. Washington DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, 2000
[23]
24 US EPA. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Technical Report. Washington DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, 2002
[24]
25 US EPA. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Technical Report. Washington, DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, 2004
[25]
26 US EPA. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria. Technical Report. Washington DC: Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, 2006
[26]
27 ARMCANZ, ANZECC. Australian and New Zealand guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Technical Report: Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, 2000
[27]
28 ECB. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment-Part II. Technical Report. Ispra: Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, 2003
[28]
29 CCME. A Protocol for the Derivation of Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life. Technical Report. Winnipeg: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2007
[29]
30 van Vlaardingen P L A, Verbruggen E M J. Guidance for the Derivation of Environmental Risk Limits within the Framework of ‘International and national environmental quality standards for substances in the Netherlands’ (INS) Bitlhoven, Technical Report. The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. RIVM-project No. 601782001. 2007
[30]
31 WHO. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality: Incorporation 1st and 2nd Addenda, Vol.1, Recommendations. 3rd ed. Technical Report. Geneva: WHO, 2006
37 Kooijman S A L M. A safety factor for LC50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species. Water Res, 1987, 21: 269–276？？
[37]
38 Aldenberg T, Slob W. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Environ Eng Sci, 1993, 25: 48–63
[38]
39 Newman M C, Ownby D R, Mézin L C A, et al. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species. Environ Toxicol Chem, 2000, 19: 508–515
[39]
40 Posthuma L Suter II G W, Traas T P. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC, 2002
[40]
41 Hall L W, Scott M C, Killen W D. Ecological risk assessment of copper and cadmium in surface waters of Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1998, 17: 1172–1189？？
[41]
42 Solomon K R, Baker D B, Richards R P, et al. Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters. Environ Toxicol Chem, 1996, 15: 31–76？？
[42]
43 Van Straalen N M, Van Rijn J P. Ecotoxicological risk assessment of soil fauna recovery from pesticide application. Rev Environ Contamin Toxicol, 1998, 154: 83–141
[43]
44 Janssen M P M, Traas T P, Rila J P, et al. Guidance for Deriving Dutch Environmental Risk Limits from EU-Risk Assessment Reports of Existing Substances. Technical Report. Report No. 6016501020. Bitlhoven: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, 2004. 35
[44]
45 OECD. Guidance Document for Aquatic Effects Assessment. Technical Report. Paris: OECD Environment Monographs No 92. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1995
[45]
46 US EPA. Health Effects Support Document for Hexachlorobutadiene. Technical Report. EPA 822-R-03-002. Washington DC: Office of Water, 2003
[46]
47 Rausina G A, Wong D C L, Raymon A W, et al. Toxicity of methyl tert-butyl ether to marine
[47]
16 NAS, NAE. Water Quality Criteria. Technical Report. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1972
