23 Betts A K, Chen F, Mitchell K E, et al. Assessment of the land surface and boundary layer models in two operational versions of the NCEP Eta Model using FIFE data. Monthly Weather Rev, 1997, 125: 2896–2916？？
[3]
17 Shafran P C, Seaman N L, Gayno G A. Evaluation of numerical predictions of boundary layer structure during the Lake Michigan Ozone Study. J Appl Meteorol, 2000, 39: 412–426？？
[4]
18 Berg L K, Zhong S Y. Sensitivity of MM5-simulated boundary layer characteristics to turbulence parameterizations. J Appl Meteorol, 2005, 44: 1467–1483？？
[5]
19 Chen F, Dudhia J. Coupling an advanced land surface-hydrology model with the Penn State-NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part I: Model implementation and sensitivity. Monthly Weather Rev, 2001, 129: 569–585？？
[6]
20 Lin W S, Wang A Y, Wu C S, et al. A case modeling of sea-land breeze in Macao and its neighborhood. Adv Atmos Sci, 2001, 18: 1231–1240？？
[7]
21 Miao J F, Chen F, Wyser K. Modelling subgrid scale dry deposition velocity of O3 over the Swedish west coast with MM5-PX model. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 415–429？？
[8]
22 Perez C, Jimenez P, Jorba O, et al. Influence of the PBL scheme on high-resolution photochemical simulations in an urban coastal area over the Western Mediterranean. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 5274– 5297？？
[9]
24 Hanna S R, Yang R X. Evaluations of meso-scale models’ simulations of near-surface winds, temperature gradients, and mixing depths. J Appl Meteorol, 2001, 40: 1095–1104？？
[10]
25 Zhong S Y, In H J, Bian X D, et al. Evaluation of real-time high-resolution MM5 predictions over the Great Lakes region. Weather Forecast, 2005, 20: 63–81？？
[11]
26 Xiu A J, Pleim J E. Development of a land surface model. Part I: Application in a meso-scale meteorological model. J Appl Meteorol, 2001,40: 192–209？？
4 Hu X M, Liu S H, Wang Y C, et al. Numerical simulation of wind and temperature fields over Beijing area in summer. Acta Meteorol Sin, 2005, 19: 120–127
7 Grell G A, Dudhia J, Stauffer D R. A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Meso-scale Model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note. 1995？？
[20]
8 Ratnam J V, Kumar K K. Sensitivity of the simulated monsoons of 1987 and 1988 to convective parameterization schemes in MM5. J Clim, 2005, 18: 2724–2743？？
[21]
9 Reisner J, Rasmussen R M, Bruintjes R T. Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 meso-scale model. Quart J Royal Meteorol Soc, 1998, 124: 1071–1107？？
[22]
10 Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K. Precipitation forecast skill of different convective parameterization and microphysical schemes: Application for the cold season over Greece. Geophys Res Lett, 2001, 28: 1977–1980？？
[23]
11 Angevine W M, Mitchell K. Evaluation of the NCEP meso-scale Eta Model convective boundary layer for air quality applications. Monthly Weather Rev, 2001,129: 2761–2775？？
[24]
12 Chandrasekar A, Philbrick C R, Clark R, et al. Evaluating the performance of a computationally efficient MM5/CALMET system for developing wind field inputs to air quality models. Atmos Environ, 2003, 37: 3267–3276？？
[25]
13 Grell G A, Emeis S, Stockwell W R, et al. Application of a multiscale, coupled MM5/chemistry model to the complex terrain of the VOTALP valley campaign. Atmos Environ, 2000, 34: 1435–1453
[26]
14 Jackson B, Chau D, Gurer K, et al. Comparison of ozone simulations using MM5 and CALMET/MM5 hybrid meteorological COOS fields for the July/August 2000 episode. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 2812–2822？？
[27]
15 Mao Q, Gautney L L, Cook T M, et al. Numerical experiments on MM5-CMAQ sensitivity to various PBL schemes. Atmos Environ, 2006, 40: 3092–3110？？
[28]
16 Miao J F, Chen D, Wyser K, et al. Evaluation of MM5 meso-scale model at local scale for air quality applications over the Swedish west coast: Influence of PBL and LSM parameterizations. Meteorol Atmos Phys, 2008, 99: 77–103？？
