全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
中外法学  2008 

全球变暖下的环境诉讼原告资格分析

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

References

[1]  Declaration of Melanie Duchin at 2,niends of the Earth,Inc.v.Watson,No.C 02—4106(JSW),2005 WL 2035596(N.D.Cal.Aug.23,2005).
[2]  Friends of the Earth,Inc.v.Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.,204 F.3d 149 at 162.(4(th上标)Cir.2000).
[3]  Lujan v.Defenders of Wildlife,.504 u.s.555,at 560(1992).
[4]  Warth v.Seldin,422 u.s.490,508(1975).A plaintiffmust show that“the practical consequence”of a favorable Idecision would result in“a significant increase in the likelihood that the plaintiff would obtain relief that direcfly redresses the injury suffered.”Utah v.Evans,.536 u.S.452,464(2002).
[5]  Interfaith Cmty.Org.v.Honeywell Int''l,Inc.,399 F.3d 248,257(3d Cir.2005).
[6]  See Laidlaw,528 U.S.at 185—86.Justice Scalia found the Court’s treatment of redressability to be just as “cavalier”as its treatment of injury—in—fact.Id.at 202(Scalia,J.,dissenting).
[7]  Massachusetts v.EPA,127 S.Ct.1438.at 1452—63(2007).
[8]  Massachusetts v.EPA,127 S.CL 1438,at 1467(2007).
[9]  Luian v.Defenders of Wildlife,504 U.S..555(1992).
[10]  Georgia v.Tennessee Copper Company,206 U.S.230(1907)
[11]  Cf.Ann Woolhandler&Michael G.Collins,State Standing,81 va.L.Rev.387,506(1995)(suggesting that it would be appropriate to analyze state standing based on traditional common—law in—terests in propelty and liberty under a modified Lujan test).
[12]  See Thomas W.Merrill,Global Warming as a Public Nuisance,30 Colum.J.Envtl.L.293,at 304(2005).
[13]  See Thomas W.Merrill,Global Warming as a Public Nuisance,30 Colum.J.Envtl.L.293,304,at 305(2005).
[14]  See Kathryn A.Watts&Amy J.Wildermuth,Massachusetts v.EPA:Breaking New Ground on Issues Other Than Global Warming,102 Nw.U.L.Rev.Colloquy J,at 6(2007).
[15]  See Thomas W.Mereill,Global Warming as a Public Nuisance,30 Colum.J.Envtl.L.293、304,at 300—01(2005).
[16]  See Barry G.Rabe,Mikael Romdn,&Arthur N.Dobelis,State Competition as a Source Driving Climate Change Mitigation,14 N.Y.U.Envtl.L.J.1,29(2005).
[17]  Lujan v.Defenders of Wildlife,504 U.s.555,at 560—61(1992).
[18]  Friends of the Earth v.Laidlaw Envtl.Servs.,528 u.S.167(2000).
[19]  Friends of the Earth v.Laidlaw Envtl.Servs.,528 U.S.167,al 175—76(2000)
[20]  Friends of the Earth v.Laidlaw Envtl.Servs.,528 U.s.167,at 181—82(2000)
[21]  Friends of the Earth v.Laidlaw Envtl.Servs.,528 U.S.167,at 185(2000).
[22]  Friends of the Earth,Inc.v.Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.,204 F.3d 149(4(th上标)Cir.2000).
[23]  niens of the Earth,Inc.v.Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.,204 F.3d 149,at 113(4(th上标)Cir.2000).
[24]  Friends of the Earth,Inc.v.Caston Copper Recycling Corp.,204 F.3d 149,at 115(4(th上标)Cir.2000).
[25]  Friends ofthe Earth v.Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.,204 F.3d 149,156(4(th上标)Cir.2000).
[26]  Lujan v.Defenders of Wildl/fe,504 U.S.555,563(1992).
[27]  Lujan v.Defenders of Wildlife,504 U.S.555,563(1992).
[28]  Friends of the Earth v.Laidlaw Envtl.Servs.,528 U.S.167,184(2000).It even appears that some courts consider a spiritual interest a concrete interest.In Defenders of Wildlife v.EnviromerUal Protection Agency,the plaintiffs liked to watch and take pictures of different animal species,as well as hike and camp in their habitats.420 F.3d 946,956(9(th上标)Cir.2005).
[29]  Sierra Club v.Tenn.Valley Auth.,430 F.3d 1337,1344(11(th上标)Cir.2005);see also Laidlaw,528 U.S.at184.
[30]  See Sierra Club,430 F.3d at 1345.
[31]  Lujan v.Defenders of Wildli,504 U.S.555,575 n.1(1992).
[32]  Friends of the Earth v.Gaston Copper Recycling Corp.,204 F.3d 149,156(4(th上标)Cir.2000);see also Fed.Election Comm’n v.Akins,524 U.S.11,34—35(1998)(stating that those with generalized grievances should pursue those claims in the political branches of the government,not within the judieiary).
[33]  Animal Legal Def.Fund v.Glickman,154 F.3d 426,432—33(D.c.cir.1998)
[34]  Animal Legal Def.Fund v.Glickman,154 F.3d 426,432—33(D.c.cir.1998)
[35]  Massachusetts v.EPA,415 F.3d 50,59—60(D.C.Cir.2005).
[36]  Massachusetts v.EPA,415 F.3d 50,60(D.C.Cir.2005).
[37]  Lujan v.Defenders of Wildlife,504 u.s.555,560—61(1992).
[38]  Lujan,504 U.S.at 564 n.2.
[39]  See Holman W.Jenkins,Jr.,A Global Warming Worksheet,Wall St.J.,Feb.1,2006,at A15.
[40]  Lujan v.Defenders of Wildlife,504 U.S.555,560(1992).
[41]  See Holman W.Jenkins,Jr.,A Global Wanning Worksheet,Wall St .J.,Feb.1,2006,at A15.
[42]  Mark LaRochelle&Peter Spencer,“Global Warming”Science:Fact vs.Fiction.Consumers’Res.Mag.,July 2001.at 5.
[43]  See Sallie Baliunas,Full of Hot Air:A Climate Alarmist Takes on“Criminals Against Humanitv,”Reason,Oct.2005,at 64.
[44]  Texas v.United States,523 U.S.296,300—01(1998).
[45]  Lujan v.Defenders of Witdlife,584 U.S.555,567 n.3(1992).

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133