1 Hasson U, Glucksberg S. Does understanding negation entail affirmation? J Pragma, 2006, 38: 1015-1032
[2]
2 Kaup B, Lüdtke J, Zwaan A R. Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: is a door that is not open mentally closed? JPragma, 2006, 38: 1033-1050
[3]
3 Lüdtke J, Friedrich C, De Filippis M, et al. ERP correlates of negation. J Cogn Neurosci, 2008, 20: 1355-1370？？
[4]
4 Giora R, Balaban N, Fein O, obal. Negation as positivity in disguise. In: Colston H L, Katz A, eds. Figurative Language Comprehension.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2004. 233-258
[5]
5 Kaup B, Yaxley R H, Madden C J, et al. Experiential simulations of negated text information. Q J Exp Psychol, 2007, 60: 976-990？？
[6]
6 Kaup B, Zwaan R A, Lüdtke J. The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negated text information represented? In:Schmalhofer F, Perfetti C A, eds. Higher Level Language Processes in the Brain: Inference and Comprehension Processes. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum, 2007. 255-288
8 Mayo R, Schul Y, Burnstein E. “I am not guilty” versus “I am innocent”: Successful negation may depend on the schema used for itsencoding. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2004, 40: 433-449？？
[9]
9 Brewer W F, Lichtenstein E H. Recall of logical and pragmatic implications in sentences with dichotomous and continues antonyms. MemCognit, 1975, 3: 315-318
[10]
10 MacDonald M C, Just M A. Changes in activation levels with negation. J Exp Psychol, 1989, 15: 633-642？？
[11]
11 Nieuwland M S, Kuperberg G R. When the truth isn’t too hard to handle: An event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation.Psychological Science, 2008, 19: 1213-1218？？
13 Heinze H J, Muente T F, Kutas M. Context effects in a category verification task as assessed by event-related brain potential (ERP)measures. Bioll Psychol, 1998, 47: 121-135？？
[14]
14 Kiran S, Thompson C K. Effect of typicality on online category verification of animate category exemplars in aphasia. Brain Lang, 2003,85: 441-450？？
[15]
15 Rogers T T, Patterson K. Object categorization: Reversals and explanations of the basic-Level advantage. J Exp Psychol Gen, 2007, 136:451-469？？
[16]
16 Kutas M, Hillyard S A. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 1980, 207: 203-205？？
[17]
17 Kutas M, Federmeier K D. Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci, 2000, 12:463-470
[18]
18 Kutas M, Hillyard S A. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 1984, 307: 161-163？？
[19]
19 Schumacher R, Wirth M, Perrig W J, et al. ERP correlates of superordinate category activation. Int J Psychophysiol, 2009, 72: 134-144？？
[20]
20 Fujihara N, Nagaeishi Y, Koyama S, et al. Electrophysiological evidence for the typicality effect of human cognitive categorization. Int JPsychophysiol, 1998, 29: 65-75？？
[21]
21 Heinze H, Muente T, Kutas M. Context effects in a category verification task as assessed by event-related brain potential (ERP) measures.Biol Psychol, 1998, 47: 121-135？？
[22]
22 Fischler I, Bloom P, Childers D, et al. Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 1983, 20: 400-409？？
[23]
23 Hald L, Kutas M, Urbach T P, et al. The N400 is not a brainwave: Negation and the N400 effects for true and false sentences. Posterpresented at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, New York. April, 2005
[24]
24 Kounios J, Holcomb P. Structure and process in semantic memory: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction-times. J ExpPsychol Gen, 1992, 121: 459-479
[25]
25 Katayama J, Miyata Y, Yagi A. Sentence verification and event-related brain potentials. Biol Psychol, 1987, 25: 173-185？？
[26]
26 Batting W F, Montague W E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut categorynorms. J Exp Psychol, 1969, 80: 1-46
28 Deutsch R. What does it take to negate? How processing negated information affects cognition and behavior. Doctoral dissertation.Würzburg: Julius-Maximilians-Universit?t. 2002
[29]
29 Grice P. Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan J L, eds. Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Seminar, 1975. 41-58
[30]
30 Sperber D, Wilson D. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995
[31]
31 Clark H H, Clark E V. Psychology and Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1977
[32]
32 Giora R. Anything negatives can do affirmatives can do just as well, except for some metaphors. J Pragma, 2006, 38: 981-1014？？
[33]
33 Givón T. Negation in language: pragmatics, function, ontology. In: Cole P, ed. Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics, vol.9. New York:Academic Press, 1978. 69-112
[34]
34 Horn L. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989
[35]
35 Piaget J. The equilibration of cognitive structures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985
[36]
36 Wason P. The contexts of plausible denial. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav, 1965, 4: 7-11？？
38 Rugg M D, Curran T. Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci, 2007, 11: 251-257？？
[39]
39 Rugg M D, Mark R E, Walla P, et al. Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory. Nature, 1998, 392: 595-597？？
[40]
40 Smith, M E, Guster K. Decomposition of recognition memory event-related potentials yields target, repetition, and retrieval effects.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 1993, 86: 335-343？？
[41]
41 Collins A M, Loftus E F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev, 1975, 82: 407-428？？
[42]
42 David G, Porto A. Inheritance in a hierarchy of theories. Prog artifi intell LNCS, 1993, 727: 77-92
[43]
43 Collins A M, Quillian M R. Retrieval time from semantic memory. J Verbal Learn Verbal Behav, 1969, 8: 240-247？？
[44]
44 Marques J F, Canessa N, Cappa S. Neural differences in the processing of true and false sentences: Insights into the nature of ‘truth’ inlanguage comprehension. Cortex, 2009, 45: 759-768？？
[45]
45 Deutsch R, Gawronski B, Strack F. At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2006, 91:385-405？？
[46]
46 Deutsch R, Kordts-Freudinger R, Gawronski B, et al. Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing. Exp Psychol,2009, 56: 434-446？？
[47]
47 Olichney J M, Van Petten C, Paller K A, et al. Word repetition in amnesia: Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory.Brain, 2000, 123: 1948-1963？？
[48]
48 Mecklinger A. On the modularity of recognition memory for object form and spatial location: a topographic ERP analysis.Neuropsychologia, 1998, 36: 441-460？？
[49]
49 Jung-Beeman M. Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends Cogn Sci, 2005, 9: 512-518？？
[50]
50 Koivisto M, Laine M. Strategies of semantic categorization in the cerebral hemispheres. Brain Lang, 1999, 66: 341-357？？
[51]
51 Müller U, Sokol B, Overton W. Developmental sequences in class reasoning and propositional reasoning. J Exp Child Psychol, 1999, 74:69-106？？
[52]
52 Piaget J. Experiments in contradiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980
[53]
53 Riesz E D, Cantor G N. Piaget’s grouping II: The model, its assessment, and the effect of training. Dev Rev, 1985, 5: 289-308？？
