1 Werner T. Promoters can contribute to the elucidation of protein function. Trends Biotechnol, 2003, 21: 9-13
[2]
2 Geiger T, Wehner A, Schaab C, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of eleven common cell lines reveals ubiquitous but varying expression of most proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2012, 11: M111.014050
[3]
3 Bellew M, Coram M, Fitzgibbon M, et al. A suite of algorithms for the comprehensive analysis of complex protein mixtures using high-resolution LC-MS. Bioinformatics, 2006, 22: 1902-1909
[4]
4 张尧庭. 统计中的三大学派. 统计教育, 1995, 1: 35-39
[5]
5 Student. On the error of counting with a haemacytometer. Biometrika, 1907, 5: 351-360
[6]
6 Roxas BA, Li Q. Significance analysis of microarray for relative quantitation of LC/MS data in proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9: 187
[7]
7 Andreev V P, Li L, Rejtar T, et al. New algorithm for 15N/14N quantitation with LC-ESI-MS using an LTQ-FT mass spectrometer. J Proteome Res, 2006, 5: 2039-2045
[8]
8 Wu C C, MacCoss M J, Howell K E, et al. Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. Anal Chem, 2004, 76: 4951-4959
10 Tusher V G, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98: 5116-5121
[11]
11 Jain N, Thatte J, Braciale T, et al. Local-pooled-error test for identifying differentially expressed genes with a small number of replicated microarrays. Bioinformatics, 2003, 19: 1945-1951
[12]
12 Allet N, Barrillat N, Baussant T, et al. In vitro and in silico processes to identify differentially expressed proteins. Proteomics, 2004, 4: 2333-2351
[13]
13 Cho H, Smalley D M, Theodorescu D, et al. Statistical identification of differentially labeled peptides from liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Proteomics, 2007, 7: 3681-3692
[14]
14 Clough T, Thaminy S, Ragg S, et al. Statistical protein quantification and significance analysis in label-free LC-MS experiments with complex designs. BMC Bioinformatics, 2012, 13: S6
[15]
15 Cameron A C, Trivedi P K. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998
[16]
16 Leitch M C, Mitra I, Sadygov R G. Generalized linear and mixed models for label-free shotgun proteomics. Stat Interface, 2012, 5: 89-98
[17]
17 Li M, Gray W, Zhang H, et al. Comparative shotgun proteomics using spectral count data and quasi-likelihood modeling. J Proteome Res, 2010, 9: 4295-4305
[18]
18 Pham T V, Piersma S R, Warmoes M, et al. On the beta-binomial model for analysis of spectral count data in label-free tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26: 363-369
[19]
19 Pham T V, Jimenez C R. An accurate paired sample test for count data. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28: I596-I602
[20]
20 Fisher R. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1934
[21]
21 Sokal R R, Rohlf F J. Biometry: the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1995
[22]
22 Audic S, Claverie J M. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res, 1997, 7: 986-995
[23]
23 Taverner T, Karpievitch Y V, Polpitiya A D, et al. Danter: an extensible R-based tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28: 2404-2406
[24]
24 Zhang B, VerBerkmoes N C, Langston M A, et al. Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res, 2006, 5: 2909-2918
[25]
25 Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B, 1995, 57: 289-300
[26]
26 Cooper B, Feng J, Garrett W M. Relative, label-free protein quantitation: spectral counting error statistics from nine replicate mudpit samples. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom, 2010, 21: 1534-1546
[27]
27 Mann M. Comparative analysis to guide quality improvements in proteomics. Nat Methods, 2009, 6: 717-719
[28]
28 Troyanskaya O G, Garber M E, Brown P O, et al. Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data. Bioinformatics, 2002, 18: 1454-1461
[29]
29 Efron B. Microarrays, empirical bayes and the two-groups model. Stat Sci, 2008, 23: 1-22
[30]
30 Margolin A A, Ong S E, Schenone M, et al. Empirical bayes analysis of quantitative proteomics experiments. PLoS One, 2009, 4: e7454
[31]
31 Ong S E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2002, 1: 376-386
[32]
32 Koopmans F, Cornelisse L N, Heskes T, et al. Empirical bayesian random censoring threshold model improves detection of differentially abundant proteins. J Proteome Res, 2014, 13: 3871-3880
[33]
33 Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, et al. Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics, 2001, 17: 520-525
[34]
34 Candes E J, Plan Y. Matrix completion with noise. Proc IEEE, 2010, 98: 925-936
[35]
35 Choi H, Fermin D, Nesvizhskii A I. Significance analysis of spectral count data in label-free shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2008, 7: 2373-2385
[36]
36 Booth J G, Eilertson K E, Olinares P D, et al. A bayesian mixture model for comparative spectral count data in shotgun proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2011, 10: M110.007203
[37]
37 Serang O, Paulo J, Steen H, et al. A non-parametric cutout index for robust evaluation of identified proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2013, 12: 807-812
[38]
38 Serang O, Cansizoglu A E, Kall L, et al. Nonparametric bayesian evaluation of differential protein quantification. J Proteome Res, 2013, 12: 4556-4565
[39]
39 Pavelka N, Pelizzola M, Vizzardelli C, et al. A power law global error model for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics, 2004, 5: 203
[40]
40 Pavelka N, Fournier M L, Swanson S K, et al. Statistical similarities between transcriptomics and quantitative shotgun proteomics data. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2008, 7: 631-644
[41]
41 Li Q, Roxas B A. An assessment of false discovery rates and statistical significance in label-free quantitative proteomics with combined filters. BMC Bioinformatics, 2009, 10: 43
[42]
42 Webb-Robertson B J, McCue L A, Waters K M, et al. Combined statistical analyses of peptide intensities and peptide occurrences improves identification of significant peptides from ms-based proteomics data. J Proteome Res, 2010, 9: 5748-5756
44 Karpievitch Y, Stanley J, Taverner T, et al. A statistical framework for protein quantitation in bottom-up MS-based proteomics. Bioinformatics, 2009, 25: 2028-2034
[45]
45 Wang X, Anderson G A, Smith R D, et al. A hybrid approach to protein differential expression in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28: 1586-1591
[46]
46 Xu J, Wang L, Li J. A biological network module-based model for the analysis of differential expression in shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res, 2014, doi: 10.1021/pr5007203
[47]
47 Pawitan Y, Murthy K R, Michiels S, et al. Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies. Bioinformatics, 2005, 21: 3865-3872
[48]
48 Shaffer J P. Multiple hypothesis testing. Annu Rev Psychol, 1995, 46: 561-584
[49]
49 Storey J D. The positive false discovery rate: a bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Ann Stat, 2003, 31: 2013-2035
[50]
50 Dudoit S, Yang Y H, Callow M J, et al. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Stat Sinica, 2002, 12: 111-140
[51]
51 Fu Y, Qian X. Transferred subgroup false discovery rate for rare post-translational modifications detected by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics, 2013, 13: 1359-1368
[52]
52 Elias J E, Gygi S P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods, 2007, 4: 207-214
[53]
53 Tan Y D, Xu H. A general method for accurate estimation of false discovery rates in identification of differentially expressed genes. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30: 2018-2025
[54]
54 Farcomeni A. A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion. Stat Methods Med Res, 2008, 17: 347-388
[55]
55 Efron B. Large-scale simultaneous hypothesis testing. J Am Stat Assoc, 2004, 99: 96-104
[56]
56 Storey J D, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 9440-9445
[57]
57 Bei Y, Hong P. A novel approach to minimize false discovery rate in genome-wide data analysis. BMC Syst Biol, 2013, 7: S1
[58]
58 Noble W S. How does multiple testing correction work? Nat Biotechnol, 2009, 27: 1135-1137
[59]
59 Sham P C, Purcell S M. Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat Rev Genet, 2014, 15: 335-346
[60]
60 Krzywinski M, Altman N. Points of significance: importance of being uncertain. Nat Methods, 2013, 10: 1041-1042
[61]
61 Carvalho P C, Fischer J S, Chen EI, et al. Patternlab for proteomics: a tool for differential shotgun proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics, 2008, 9: 316
[62]
62 Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol, 2008, 26: 1367-1372
[63]
63 Chang C, Zhang J, Han M, et al. Silver: an efficient tool for stable isotope labeling LC-MS data quantitative analysis with quality control methods. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30: 586-587
[64]
64 Lin W T, Hung W N, Yian Y H, et al. Multi-q: a fully automated tool for multiplexed protein quantitation. J Proteome Res, 2006, 5: 2328-2338
[65]
65 Little K M, Lee J K, Ley K. ReSASC: a resampling-based algorithm to determine differential protein expression from spectral count data. Proteomics, 2010, 10: 1212-1222
[66]
66 Carvalho P C, Yates J R 3rd, Barbosa V C. Improving the TFold test for differential shotgun proteomics. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28: 1652-1654
[67]
67 Elo L L, Hiissa J, Tuimala J, et al. Optimized detection of differential expression in global profiling experiments: case studies in clinical transcriptomic and quantitative proteomic datasets. Brief Bioinform, 2009, 10: 547-555
[68]
68 Heinecke N, Pratt B, Vaisar T, et al. PepC: proteomics software for identifying differentially expressed proteins based on spectral counting. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26: 1574-1575
