Absence of Maternal Methylation in Biparental Hydatidiform Moles from Women with NLRP7 Maternal-Effect Mutations Reveals Widespread Placenta-Specific Imprinting
Familial recurrent hydatidiform mole (RHM) is a maternal-effect autosomal recessive disorder usually associated with mutations of the NLRP7 gene. It is characterized by HM with excessive trophoblastic proliferation, which mimics the appearance of androgenetic molar conceptuses despite their diploid biparental constitution. It has been proposed that the phenotypes of both types of mole are associated with aberrant genomic imprinting. However no systematic analyses for imprinting defects have been reported. Here, we present the genome-wide methylation profiles of both spontaneous androgenetic and biparental NLRP7 defective molar tissues. We observe total paternalization of all ubiquitous and placenta-specific differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in four androgenetic moles; namely gain of methylation at paternally methylated loci and absence of methylation at maternally methylated regions. The methylation defects observed in five RHM biopsies from NLRP7 defective patients are restricted to lack-of-methylation at maternal DMRs. Surprisingly RHMs from two sisters with the same missense mutations, as well as consecutive RHMs from one affected female show subtle allelic methylation differences, suggesting inter-RHM variation. These epigenotypes are consistent with NLRP7 being a maternal-effect gene and involved in imprint acquisition in the oocyte. In addition, bioinformatic screening of the resulting methylation datasets identified over sixty loci with methylation profiles consistent with imprinting in the placenta, of which we confirm 22 as novel maternally methylated loci. These observations strongly suggest that the molar phenotypes are due to defective placenta-specific imprinting and over-expression of paternally expressed transcripts, highlighting that maternal-effect mutations of NLRP7 are associated with the most severe form of multi-locus imprinting defects in humans.
References
[1]
Hoffner L, Surti U. The genetics of gestational trophoblastic disease: a rare complication of pregnancy. Cancer Genet. 2012;205: 63–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.01.004. pmid:22469506
[2]
Judson H, Hayward BE, Sheridan E, Bonthron DT. A global disorder of imprinting in the human female germ line. Nature. 2002;416: 539–42. pmid:11932746 doi: 10.1038/416539a
[3]
Murdoch S, Djuric U, Mazhar B, Seoud M, Khan R, Kuick R, et al. Mutations in NALP7 cause recurrent hydatidiform moles and reproductive wastage in humans. Nat Genet. 2006;38: 300–2. pmid:16462743 doi: 10.1038/ng1740
[4]
Parry DA, Logan CV, Hayward BE, Shires M, Landolsi H, Diggle C, et al. Mutations causing familial biparental hydatidiform mole implicate c6orf221 as a possible regulator of genomic imprinting in the human oocyte. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89: 451–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.08.002. pmid:21885028
[5]
Wang CM, Dixon PH, Decordova S, Hodges MD, Sebire NJ, Ozalp S, et al. Identification of 13 novel NLRP7 mutations in 20 families with recurrent hydatidiform mole; missense mutations cluster in the leucine-rich region. J Med Genet. 2009;46: 569–75. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2008.064196. pmid:19246479
[6]
Dixon PH, Trongwongsa P, Abu-Hayyah S, Ng SH, Akbar SA, Khawaja NP, et al. Mutations in NLRP7 are associated with diploid biparental hydatidiform moles, but not androgenetic complete moles. J Med Genet 2012;49: 206–11. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2011-100602. pmid:22315435
[7]
Reddy R, Akoury E, Phuong Nguyen NM, Abdul-Rahman OA, Dery C, Gupta N, et al. Report of four new patients with protein-truncating mutations in C6orf221/KHDC3L and colocalization with NLRP7. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21: 957–64. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.274. pmid:23232697
[8]
Nguyen NM, Slim R. Genetics and Epigenetics of Recurrent Hydatidiform Moles: Basic Science and Genetic Counselling. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2014;3: 55–64. pmid:24533231 doi: 10.1007/s13669-013-0076-1
[9]
Fisher RA Lavery SA, Carby A, Abu-Hayyeh S, Swingler R, Sebire NJ, Seckl MJ. What a difference an egg makes. Lancet 2011;378: 1974. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61751-0. pmid:22130487
[10]
Zhang P, Dixon M, Zucchelli M, Hambiliki F, Levkov L, Hovatta O, et al. Expression analysis of the NLRP gene family suggests a role in human preimplantation development. PLoS One. 2008;3: e2755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002755. pmid:18648497
[11]
Akoury E, Zhang L, Ao A, Slim R.NLRP7 and KHDC3L, the two maternal-effect proteins responsible for recurrent hydatidiform moles, co-localize to the oocyte cytoskeleton. Hum Reprod. 2015;30: 159–69. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu291. pmid:25358348
[12]
Court F, Martin-Trujillo A, Romanelli V, Garin I, Iglesias-Platas I, Salafsky I, et al. Genome-wide allelic methylation analysis reveals disease-specific susceptibility to multiple methylation defects in imprinting syndromes. Hum Mutat. 2013;34: 595–602. doi: 10.1002/humu.22276. pmid:23335487
[13]
Kou YC, Shao L, Peng HH, Rosetta R, del Gaudio D, Wagner AF, et al. A recurrent intragenic genomic duplication, other novel mutations in NLRP7 and imprinting defects in recurrent biparental hydatidiform moles. Mol Hum Reprod 2008;14: 33–40. pmid:18039680 doi: 10.1093/molehr/gam079
[14]
Hayward BE, De Vos M, Talati N, Abdollahi MR, Taylor GR, Meyer E, et al. Genetic and epigenetic analysis of recurrent hydatidiform mole. Hum Mutat. 2009;30: E629–39 doi: 10.1002/humu.20993. pmid:19309689
[15]
Ferguson-Smith AC. Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12: 565–75. doi: 10.1038/nrg3032. pmid:21765458
[16]
Dué？ez-Guzmán EA, Haig D. The evolution of reproduction-related NLRP genes. J Mol Evol. 2014;78: 194–201. doi: 10.1007/s00239-014-9614-3. pmid:24615281
[17]
Meyer E, Lim D, Pasha S, Tee LJ, Rahman F, Yates JR, et al. Germline mutation in NLRP2 (NALP2) in a familial imprinting disorder (Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome). PLoS Genet. 2009;5: e1000423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000423. pmid:19300480
[18]
Court F, Tayama C, Romanelli V, Martin-Trujillo A, Iglesias-Platas I, Okamura K, et al. Genome-wide parent-of-origin DNA methylation analysis reveals the intricacies of human imprinting and suggests a germline methylation-independent mechanism of establishment. Genome Res. 2014;24: 554–69. doi: 10.1101/gr.164913.113. pmid:24402520
[19]
Okae H, Chiba H, Hiura H, Hamada H, Sato A, Utsunomiya T, et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation dynamics during early human development. PloS Genet. 2014;10: e1004868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004868. pmid:25501653
[20]
Camprubí C, Iglesias-Platas I, Martin-Trujillo A, Salvador-Alarcon C, Rodriguez MA, Barredo DR, et al. Stability of genomic imprinting and gestational-age dynamic methylation in complicated pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technologies. Biol Reprod. 2013;89: 50. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.108456. pmid:23884645
[21]
Metsalu T, Viltrop T, Tiirats A, Rajashekar B, Reimann E, K？ks S, et al. Using RNA sequencing for identifying gene imprinting and random monoallelic expression in human placenta. Epigenetics. 2014;9: 1397–409. doi: 10.4161/15592294.2014.970052. pmid:25437054
[22]
Pozharny Y, Lambertini L, Ma Y, Ferrara L, Litton CG, Diplas A, et al. Genomic loss of imprinting in first-trimester human placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202: 391.e1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.039
[23]
Kobayashi H, Yanagisawa E, Sakashita A, Sugawara N, Kumakura S, Ogawa H, et al. Epigenetic and transcriptional features of the novel human imprinted lncRNA GPR1AS suggest it is a functional orthology to mouse Zdbf2linc. Epigenetics. 2013;8: 635–45. doi: 10.4161/epi.24887. pmid:23764515
[24]
Duffié R, Ajjan S, Greenberg M, Zamudio N, Secamilla del Arenal M, Iranzo J, et al. The Gpr1/Zdbf2 locus provides new paradigms for transient and dynamic genomic imprinting in mammals. Genes & Dev. 2014;28: 463–78. doi: 10.1101/gad.232058.113
[25]
Yuen RK, Jiang R, Pe？aherrera MS, McFadden DE, Robinson WP (2011) Genome-wide mapping of imprinted differentially methylated regions by DNA methylation profiling of human placentas from triploidies. Epigenetics Chromatin 4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-4-10. pmid:21749726
[26]
Herse F, Lamarca B, Hubel CA, Kaartokallio T, Lokki AI, Ekholm E, et al. Cytochrome P450 subfamily 2J polypeptide 2 expression and circulating epoxyeicosatrienoic metabolites in preeclampsia. Circulation 2012;126: 2990–9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.127340. pmid:23155181
[27]
Kuo MW, Wang CH, Wu HC, Chang SJ, Chuang YJ. Soluble THSD7A is an N-glycoprotein that promotes endothelial cell migration and tube formation in angiogenesis. PLoS One. 2011;6: e29000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029000. pmid:22194972
[28]
Noguer-Dance M, Abu-Amero S, Al-Khtib M, Lefèvre A, Coullin P, et al. The primate-specific microRNA gene cluster (C19MC) is imprinted in the placenta. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19: 3566–82. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq272. pmid:20610438
[29]
Xie L, Mouillet JF, Chu T, Parks WT, Sadovsky E, Kn？fler M, et al. C19MC MicroRNAs Regulate the Migration of Human Trophoblasts. Endocrinology. 2014;155: 4975–85. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1501. pmid:25211593
[30]
Guo H, Zhu P, Yan L, Li R, Hu B, Lian Y, et al. The DNA methylation landscape of human early embryos. Nature. 2014;511: 606–10. doi: 10.1038/nature13544. pmid:25079557
[31]
Smith ZD, Chan MM, Humm KC, Karnik R, Mekhoubad S, Regev A, et al. (2014) DNA methylation dynamics of the human preimplantation embryo. Nature 2014;511: 611–5. doi: 10.1038/nature13581. pmid:25079558
[32]
Li X, Ito M, Zhou F, Youngson N, Zuo X, Leder P, et al. A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev Cell. 2008;15: 547–57. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.08.014. pmid:18854139
[33]
Nakamura T, Arai Y, Umehara H, Masuhara M, Kimura T, Taniguchi H, et al. PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9: 64–71. pmid:17143267 doi: 10.1038/ncb1519
[34]
Wossidlo M, Nakamura T, Lepikhov K, Marques CJ, Zakhartchenko V, Boiani M, et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Commun. 2011;2: 241. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1240. pmid:21407207
[35]
Petrussa L, Van de Velde H, De Rycke M. Dynamic regulation of DNA methyltransferases in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos after assisted reproductive technologies. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20: 861–74. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gau049. pmid:24994815
[36]
Mahadevan S, Wen S, Wan YW, Peng HH, Otta S, Liu Z, et al. NLRP7 affects trophoblast lineage differentiation, binds to overexpressed YY1 and alters CpG methylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23: 706–16. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt457. pmid:24105472
[37]
Singer H, Biswas A, Nuesgen N, Oldenburg J, El-Maarri O. NLRP7, Involved in hydatidiform molar pregnancy (HYDM1), interacts with the transcriptional repressor ZBTB16. PLoS One. 2015: e0130416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130416. pmid:26121690
[38]
Messaed C, Akoury E, Djuric U, Zeng J, Saleh M, Gilbert L, et al. NLRP7, a nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptor protein, is required for normal cytokine secretion and co-localizes with Golgi and the microtubule-organizing center. J Biol Chem. 2011;286: 43313–23. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.306191. pmid:22025618
[39]
Caillaud M, Duchamp G, Gérard N. In vivo effect of interleukin-1beta and interleukin-1RA on oocyte cytoplasmic maturation, ovulation, and early embryonic development in the mare. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2005;3: 26. pmid:15972098
[40]
Gkountela S, Li Z, Vincent JJ, Zhang KX, Chen A, Pellegrini M, et al. The ontogeny of cKIT+ human primordial germ cells proves to be a resource for human germ line reprogramming, imprint erasure and in vitro differentiation. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15: 113–22. doi: 10.1038/ncb2638. pmid:23242216
